Book Summary – The Exodus You Almost Passed Over by Rabbi David Fohrman

You’ve got to love the title of this book. And David has shown me many truths and insights I definitely overlooked. This book has challenged me unlike most others. I loved it. I heartily recommend it. It is an easy read, and Rabbi Fohrman’s breezy style makes it fun.

Whether Rabbi Fohrman is correct in his insights about the Exodus or not, my main takeaway from this book is his approach to Torah. I feel challenged to stop skim-reading the Scriptures and discover what I’ve passed over.

First, some background.

Rabbi Fohrman is an Orthodox Jew and the founder of Aleph-Beta (https://www.alephbeta.org/), whose web page declares their purpose:

Fall in love with Torah – for the first time, or all over again – with Aleph Beta’s over 1,000 beautifully produced videos, podcasts, and printable guides.

I connected with Rabbi Fohrman through the Bema podcast (https://www.bemadiscipleship.com/) – which I also highly recommend. My grandson Alex recommended this podcast to his brother and our daughter, who, in turn, recommended it to me. Thanks, Alex. Fohrman and Bema will supercharge your love for the Bible. They have mine.

Acknowledgements

It is not very often that I quote from the acknowledgements. But that is the kind of book this is. There is much to learn – everywhere.

Rabbi Fohrman partnered with a computer scientist who:

has specialized in data mining — finding and analyzing hidden, often nested, patterns in seemingly random bursts of data.

Those who know me know that I would be at home here. Fohrman goes on:

Those patterns exist in our sacred texts, too, and we each shared a sense of elation at finding them and setting about the task of discerning what they might mean.

Those words summarize what this book is all about: finding hidden and often nested patterns in the Exodus story and then discerning what they might mean. I have loved what they found, but often disagree on what they mean. That’s okay. The key is finding these gems. And the secret is in not passing over the details.

In the acknowledgement, he highlights two of the questions I have passed over, which he will deal with in the book:

    1. Why does the end of the book of Exodus place so much emphasis on the child-care arrangements for Jacob’s funeral? Missed that!
    2. Why does the Torah detail the connection between the relationship of Joseph and Jacob and the Exodus? Missed that one too! Stay tuned!

Preface

What Kind of Book is This?

Quoting from that great book by Mortimer Adler, How to Read a Book, Rabbi Fohrman tells us that we should know the kind of book we are reading before we start. If we think of a poetry book as history, we will be in trouble. Or I would say we are in trouble if we read the Bible as a science textbook. In this case, if we think of this book as a biblical commentary on the book of Exodus, you will be in trouble.

The Kind of Book This is Not

As a Biblical Commentary, it is not

    1. Critical Academic Scholarship
    2. Commentaries that deal with the Text from Personal Relevance – finding nuggets of truth that we can apply
    3. Anthology – where a vast array of scholars are quoted on the text to help us understand the text.

The Kind of Book This Is

Fohrman sees this as a guidebook that attempts to engage with the original Hebrew text to find what God was actually trying to say, and then to determine what we are to take away from it (meaning).

Part I – Taking Apart the Exodus Story

Chapter One – The Angel in the Backroom

Rabbi Fohrman teaches me by showing me how to slow down (and not pass over any details in reading the Bible). He asks questions that I have never asked. Like in this chapter: Why name the Jewish feast: Passover? Why not Freedom Day or Independence Day? Yes, the angel of death passed over the Hebrews on that night – but that wasn’t the essence of the story. Or was it? Here, Rabbi Fohrman poses one of the first of many questions that will pepper this whole book:

Perhaps the name suggests that we should adjust our sights somewhat. We tend to think of Passover the way I’ve just described it to you, as the holiday on which we got our freedom. And yet, the Torah’s own name for the night we went free doesn’t emphasize the “free” part; it emphasizes being “passed over.” Could it be that, somehow, the essence of the holiday really does revolve around the mysterious salvation that our firstborn experienced that night?

And because Fohrman is not a Messianic Jew, perhaps he also passed over the emphasis that followers of Jesus put on the Passover and its connection with Jesus’ death.

Next question I passed over: Why did God mandate[1] that the law-of-the-broken-necked donkey get put in the little boxes (tefillin) that Jews were to wear (Exodus 13:13)?[2] Why did God pick these specific aspects of the Torah to be bound to their bodies?  Fohrman claims that God wanted them to remember that He spared their firstborn sons. Hmmm! I leave it to the reader who lives on this side of the cross to see if there is some significance there.

Then the Rabbi poses another question I never asked: Why does God refer to Israel as his firstborn son when He called Moses in the desert? (Exodus 4:22-23).

He concludes Chapter 1 with this:

Maybe, then, the Exodus story is about more than we ever suspected. Is it about freedom? Yes, it surely is. Independence and the birth of a nation? Yes, that, too. But it is about more than this. In this book, I want to argue that the Exodus story tells us who we are. It is a story that tells us not just about our past, but about our future. It speaks not only of our birth, but of our destiny. It speaks of why we are here and what we are meant to achieve. The story is about what it means to be a firstborn nation.

Chapter Two – The Exodus Game

Chapter Two takes us on a thought experiment in which he asks us to play the three primary characters in the Exodus story: God, Moses, and Pharaoh. I would add Israel, but that is another story.

Imagine You are God

Goal: Deliver Your People from Slavery: Or is that the goal?

If deliverance was the only or even the primary goal, why did He use 10 plagues? Wouldn’t plague 10 have done the job? Or the ninth plague: the plague of darkness for three days, where the Egyptians couldn’t see a blasted thing, but Israel could see fine. Why not tell Israel just to walk out?  And of course, with God’s superpowers, He could have done anything to have zipped them out. Or even the pillar of cloud and pillar of fire that protected them. Just surround them before the Red Sea and march them out.

But there’s more! What about that duplicitous request to go worship in the desert for three days and then come back? If you were God, would You ask Moses to frame the request that way? No! I think if we were honest, we would just have delivered Israel and skipped the drama.

Rabbi Fohrman writes:

In the movies, by the way, that’s the way it always goes. From Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments to Steven Spielberg’s Prince of Egypt, Moses’s interaction with Pharaoh looks very different. In these Hollywood portraits of the Exodus, a stern-faced Moses sets forth a no-holds-barred ultimatum to Pharaoh: let my people go! Somehow, the rest of Moses’s speech — the word please, and the part about the three-day vacation — always gets left on the cutting room floor.

And how about the interaction with Pharaoh in Exodus 8:

25 Then Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron and said, “Go, sacrifice to your God within the land.” 26 But Moses said, “It would not be right to do so, for the offerings we shall sacrifice to the Lord our God are an abomination to the Egyptians. If we sacrifice offerings abominable to the Egyptians before their eyes, will they not stone us? 27 We must go three days’ journey into the wilderness and sacrifice to the Lord our God as he tells us.” 28 So Pharaoh said, “I will let you go to sacrifice to the Lord your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away. Plead for me.” 29 Then Moses said, “Behold, I am going out from you, and I will plead with the Lord that the swarms of flies may depart from Pharaoh, from his servants, and from his people, tomorrow. Only let not Pharaoh cheat again by not letting the people go to sacrifice to the Lord.” 30 So Moses went out from Pharaoh and prayed to the Lord. 31 And the Lord did as Moses asked, and removed the swarms of flies from Pharaoh, from his servants, and from his people; not one remained. 32 But Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and did not let the people go.

Fohrman writes:

It all seems faintly ridiculous, the squabbling back and forth. One wonders: Isn’t all this a little beneath Moses’s dignity? Isn’t it beneath God’s? God doesn’t need to bargain with Pharaoh. God doesn’t even need Pharaoh to say yes at all! The Master of the Universe is perfectly capable of delivering His people to the Promised Land, whether Pharaoh agrees to the plan or not. So why go through all of this?

One thing seems clear. For some undetermined reason, there appears to be an unwritten rule throughout the Exodus narrative, a rule that God is choosing to adhere to: the Israelites aren’t going anywhere unless Pharaoh says they are.

All of this is to help us see beyond the Exodus as Liberation Day or Independence Day. Did you notice these things in your reading of the Exodus? I sure didn’t.

Here is another thing I missed that Fohrman points out. I am sure all of us have seen the basic pattern:

    • Moses asks
    • Pharaoh says no.
    • Moses calls down a plague
    • Pharaoh says yes
    • Moses calls for an end to the plague
    • Pharaoh reneges

But did you notice what happens after this? Fohrman again:

Instead of Pharaoh changing his own mind, God seems to step in and do the mind-changing for him. In the words of the Torah, the Almighty “hardens Pharaoh’s heart” (Exodus 9:12).

Fohrman closes out the chapter with two dilemmas: a moral and a tactical.

    1. Moral: “To the extent that Pharaoh’s free will was compromised by God Himself, how can this same God hold Pharaoh responsible for his actions?”
    2. Tactical: “…it just doesn’t seem to add up. Here God is, sending Moses repeatedly to Pharaoh, enduring endless bargaining sessions with the Egyptian monarch, even coming up with a dubious three-day vacation offer — all in the interest of getting Pharaoh to say yes. Finally, it actually happens! Pharaoh says yes, and it really is yes; he’s not going to back down and change his mind. Why, at that very moment, would God interfere with Pharaoh’s free will and make him say no? Wasn’t this the moment we had all been waiting for?”

Again, Fohrman closes the chapter:

Does God care about Pharaoh’s free-willed consent, or not? If He does, then once Pharaoh gives that consent, the game should be over. And if the Almighty doesn’t care about that consent, why needlessly ask for it to begin with?

Stay tuned. There is more that we passed over!

Chapter Three – Power and Precision

Calculated Ambiguity – I certainly passed over this little morsel:

So Moses said, “Thus says the Lord: ‘About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt, and every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sits on his throne, even to the firstborn of the slave girl who is behind the handmill, and all the firstborn of the cattle Exodus 11:4-5

What? Does God have something on His calendar a little before midnight that might run shorter or longer? We later learn in chapter 12 that the angel of the Lord struck “at midnight” (Exodus 12:29). The Sages propose a solution that, since Pharaoh was so nit-picky, if Moses proposed an exact time, Pharaoh’s clocks and God’s clocks might not be synced, and this would be an excuse to deny the prediction.

Sounds to me like the Sages don’t have enough to do. But there is some method to their madness. Notice that when Egypt was overrun with frogs and the stench was intense, Moses asked Pharaoh when he wanted the frogs to go away. He says, “Tomorrow!” (Exodus 8:10). What! Your country is overrun with frogs, and you give Moses till tomorrow to get rid of them? Clearly, Pharaoh was interested in timing. The Sages point out one other odd request.  When his cattle were destroyed, he did not ask how many. He wanted to know what happened to the children of Israel’s cattle (Exodus 9:7).

Perhaps Pharaoh is not so much interested in keeping the children of Israel as he is in the precision of God’s predictive power.

Chapter Four – The Tale of Two Speeches

Another detail I passed over. Look at the two speeches Moses makes to Pharaoh and note the differences:

5:1 Afterward, Moses and Aaron went and said to Pharaoh, “Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, ‘Let my people go, that they may hold a feast to me in the wilderness.’”

3 “The God of the Hebrews has met with us. Please let us go a three-day journey into the wilderness that we may sacrifice to the Lord our God, lest he fall upon us with pestilence or with the sword.”

Speech 1 failed, so Moses tries again. Here are the major differences:

    1. What are the children of Israel called
    2. Direct or Indirect communication
    3. Celebration or Sacrifice
    4. What happens if Israel doesn’t go
    5. A command versus a please
    6. Limited departure of 3 days
    7. Yahweh versus the God of the Hebrews

Fohrman argues that two completely different pictures of God are portrayed:

    1. God of speech #1 wants to celebrate.
    2. The God of speech #1  identifies Israel as personally mine
    3. A God who has a specific name
    4. A God who addresses people personally

Look at it yourself and see if you agree that these are two different portrayals of God.

David doesn’t tell us why – Yet. Stay tuned.

Chapter 5 – Much Ado about Names

Fohrman claims that God doesn’t normally make a big to-do about His name. He rarely corrects someone about what they call Him. Perhaps this bothers you when a friend corrects someone about the name Allah. It got me wondering, when Jesus appears in dreams to a Muslim, does He say: “Oh, by the way, my name isn’t Allah. I am offended when you call Me that?”

But Fohrman claims that God does just that after the two speeches.

God spoke to Moses and said to him, “I am the YHVH. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the YHVH, I did not make myself known to them.

To a close reader of the Bible, they would see a couple of things that passed me by:

    1. The name YHVH was made known to the fathers. This text implies that it was not made known.
    2. God had already told Moses that His name was: “I am that I am” and “I am” when Moses asked Him straight out: What is Your name?

He leaves with this question, which he guarantees he will address – later.

Part II – The Exit Strategy

Chapter 6 – What’s in a Name

In this chapter, David looks at the difference between God Almighty (El Shaddai) and YHVH. He does that first by looking at the names as words. El is a Hebrew word for power (See Genesis 31:29). And when used in Elohim, it is a powerful force.

Have you ever wondered why God tells the Hebrews not to have any other gods before Him when He is the one true god? The 2nd commandment reads a little differently if you put “Elohim” in place of “gods.”  No other powerful forces before me. What that means when we address God as El Elohim, we are addressing Him as a powerful God.

So, what does it mean when we address Him as El Shaddai? Shaddai doesn’t appear in the Scriptures apart from El Shaddai. But the Sages of the Mishnah give us a hint. As a combination of Hebrew words, as they put it – El Shaddai means “the god who knows how to say ‘Enough.’”

That brings us to the name change that God is invoking with Moses.

God makes it clear to Moses that power is not His name. It is not who He is fundamentally. God will make use of power, as He is about to do – but [power] doesn’t define Him. Instead, the essence of God is about something else. It is about YHVH.

Which he addresses in the next chapter.

Chapter 7 – Do you believe in Parker

In this chapter, David takes a look at the Hebrew word for Yahweh: (יהוה). He tells us that we cannot know what the word means because it is only and is ever used for the name of God. But, undaunted, he attempts to figure it out anyway. He tells us that the last three letters of the name: הוה spell the Hebrew word for is or to exist. Three out of four of the letters spell the word “was.” And the word is close to the Hebrew word for will be. Then he says:

To summarize: this name of God is close, but not exactly equivalent to, each one of the three Hebrew words that denote past, present, and future existence.

He then makes a distinction between an eternal being and the God whose name is יהוה. To exist eternally means that you exist for a long, long time. But at any given moment, an eternal being exists in the now / in the present. But God’s name implies that God exists in the past, present, and future simultaneously.

Finally, he has us overlay the Hebrew words for past, present, and future, and what you get is the Hebrew word for Yahweh. (יהוה)

In discussing the God who exists not just eternally but in the past, present, and future simultaneously, Rabbi Fohrman has us imagine a conversation between two board tokens in the Parker Brothers game of Monopoly. Imagine that one of them doesn’t believe in Parker. He has been around the board countless times, but never finds him. “My dear Little Hat, you’re looking for Parker in all the wrong places. Parker doesn’t live on the board. He made the board!” So it is with God. He isn’t “in” time. He made time.

God’s speech to Moses just before the Ten Plagues begin, God was saying that in the past, He had been revealed as a powerful force (an el), perhaps even an ultimately powerful force (el shaddai); but now, through the Exodus, He would be revealed for who He really was: YHVH, the one who is “off the board,” outside of time and space; the Maker of time and space. Parker. The Creator.

I had never looked closely at the Hebrew in this particular dialogue between God and Moses. The English translations actually had the detail, but I didn’t fully understand it until now. Here is my summary:

When God says, “I AM WHO I AM” in Exodus 3:14, there are actually 3 Hebrew words with the first repeated. As Fohrman points out, the repeated word for I AM ( היה) is very close to the Hebrew word for YHVH (יהוה).  Later in the verse, when He says “I AM has sent you,” He is not saying YHVH but the Hebrew word for I AM. Then, in verse 15, when He says: “Say to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord … has sent me to you.’” the Hebrew word for YHVH is used. Then, in Exodus 6:4, when God says, “But by my name, the Lord, I did not make myself known to them,” He uses YHVH.

This is where I never made the distinction between the three distinct names that God uses in this short section: I AM WHO I AM; I AM; and YHVH. But what does it all mean? Stay tuned. Fohrman keeps us in suspense.

Chapter 8 – More than a Numbers Game

The point of this chapter is to contrast polytheism and monotheism. He claims that it is more than just believing in one God and believing in more than one god. Concerning polytheism:

The bottom line is that every god had its realm of power. Conversely, every deity had its own area of vulnerability: pagan deities had needs, and if you were clever enough, you could use those needs to get a god’s attention.

Furthermore, polytheism

means nothing around me is the product of anyone’s intention — pitiful little me least of all. My job, then, as a human, is to make my way in this cold universe as best I can. I am not thrust into a relationship with any transcendent force who can claim responsibility for my existence.

By contrast, monotheism means:

the universe is not the product of blind chance, but was created by a sentient being, well, that means there is intention behind existence. The universe is here because that being wanted it to be here, and willed it into existence.

If I really have a Creator, then my life is not just the byproduct of cold, blind chance. Someone wants me to be here, brought me into this world, and gave me the wherewithal to make something of myself here on earth. Love seems an entirely fitting response to that.

Fohrman asks us to:

Imagine a household where children were somehow deluded about the identity of the grownups in charge of the family. They thought the grownups were just “powers” who, for some unexplained reason, controlled all the goodies in the house.

Then he asks us to picture what it would be like to be a child in such a household. That is how it is to be a pagan. And relative to the Exodus story, God’s purpose was in part to contrast for the Egyptians what a monotheistic God was like compared to their polytheistic gods.

Chapter 9 – The Hidden Agenda

David asks us to imagine we were God and wanted to demonstrate to the world that there was a single Creator. How would we do it?

Maybe, he says, that was what God was doing with the Exodus. Exodus 7:5 says as much:

And Egypt will know that I am YHVH, as I stretch My hand out over Egypt, and deliver the Children of Israel from their midst

The Exodus was not just about delivering Israel but demonstrating that He was YHVH.

Then, as he challenges us to come up with a plan to accomplish this two-fold objective, he tells us to remember that we have to counter all of these pagan powers. Remember our original question about why all of the different plagues were required.

I had been taught that each of the plagues was an attempt by God to show His power over all of the other pagan deities of Egypt. And in one sense, that is what Fohrman is saying. But, in Fohrman’s inimitable way, there is more to it than that.

Chapter 10 – The Case for Monotheism

Rabbi Fohrman notices (another thing I passed over) the Pharaoh’s request for precision with respect to the time the plague would strike, as opposed to power in the proposed plagues. He asks:

Why would the precision with which a plague came and went — whether Moses could turn off the frogs at precisely the moment you picked, or whether a given plague distinguished precisely between Israelites and Egyptians — matter so much to you?

In a polytheistic universe, you would see lots of power, but very little control.

That Moses can do this suggests a hitherto unheard-of entity. It suggests a Creator whose control over the forces of nature is complete and absolute. It suggests a Force that does not share power with any true competitors.

He then points out yet another factoid I passed over that was a counter to paganism. In a pagan worldview, there were competing powers over the elements. One might control the rain. One might control the frogs. But look at this:

And there was hail — and fire encased inside the hail (Exodus 9:24)

There was a god of fire and a god of ice – but they never worked together. This is more evidence I overlooked of God’s purpose in the plagues. It wasn’t just to let the people go; it was also to convert the nation of Egypt to monotheism. In Fohrman’s words: “by causing diametrically opposed natural forces to work in harmony toward a common end.”

Fohrman restates his theory:

the Exodus had a dual goal — free the Hebrews from slavery, but do so in a way that educates Pharaoh in the nature of the force he is opposing. That power is not a mere god in a pantheon of divine beings, but the one and only Creator. If the most established civilization of the ancient world, entirely devoted to paganism, were to embrace the idea of monotheism, if its leader were to accept the truth that the world contains a Creator to whom he is subject — that would certainly be a historical testament to the truth of monotheism.

Chapter 11 – Stubbornness and Courage

Next, Fohrman addresses the question of free will. Why does God harden Pharaoh’s heart to prevent the successful completion of His plan?

Fohrman proposes that the plagues might convince Pharaoh to let Israel go, but not acknowledge the Power behind the plagues. Then he heads down another path and asks if someone encourages another to continue on with a struggle, are you violating their will? I think most of us would say: No. Fohrman sees this hardening of the heart in just that way. Pharaoh was ready to give in to the request to let Israel go, but not accept YHVH as the creator. So, hardening the heart was a way of encouraging Pharaoh to persevere in accepting God as the monotheistic creator. But then the question is: Is that in the text? Let’s listen to David:

Pharaoh has many changes of heart over the course of the plagues, but the Torah doesn’t always use the same verb to characterize a change of heart. It switches off between two different verbs. One comes from the Hebrew root כָּבַד (k-b-d),[3] and the other, from the Hebrew root חזק (ch-z-k).[4]

חזק (ch-z-k) – carries the sense of to be strong, to strengthen, to harden, to prevail, to take hold of

Thus, in David’s words:

if, in reading through the plagues, you ever find that God is the one to change Pharaoh’s mind, and the phrase used to describe that change of mind is chizuk halev [חזק (ch-z-k) ]— then that, right there, is an instance of God lending courage to the embattled Egyptian leader,

כָּבַד (k-b-d) – carries the sense of stubbornness or heaviness or even glory (and thus the “weight of glory”).

we need to consider a second problem that could interfere with God’s plan to reveal Himself through Pharaoh’s free-willed recognition of a Creator-God. … What if, instead of giving in too soon, Pharaoh never gives in and recognizes the Creator, even when the evidence is absolutely overwhelming? We might call this the problem of stubbornness. As it happens, Pharaoh does occasionally act with something akin to blind stubbornness. The Hebrew word for that is [כָּבַד (k-b-d) ].

A bit of the fly in his ointment here is Exodus 10:1, where God puts the stubbornness in Pharaoh. Will he discuss that in his musings? Keep reading.

So there are two kinds of reversals of Pharaoh’s will in the text. Sometimes it occurs when he gives in to the request but doesn’t acknowledge God. And then there are the times where he doesn’t give in or acknowledge God as YHWH.

Again, David:

Perhaps there is a Plan A, a nonviolent sign of some sort that overwhelmingly indicates the existence of a Creator. Perhaps there is a Plan B, an effort to educate Pharaoh, over time, as to the existence of a Creator. But if these efforts fail, there has to be a Plan C. Was there a Plan C? And did it ever have to be implemented? These are questions we will look to answer as we read through the story of the Ten Plagues together. We’ve developed some theories about Plans A, B, and C — what they might have been, and how they might be executed. But the ultimate litmus test is the text. As we return to the biblical text and actually read through the Exodus story, it will be time to see how theory translates into reality.

Read on.

Part III Putting the Exodus Story Back Together Again

Chapter 12 – The Path not Taken

David kicks us off:

The story of the plagues is, to some extent, the story of a protracted negotiation between Moses and Pharaoh, a process marked by constant changes of mind on the part of the Egyptian king. As we noted, those changes of mind are characterized by two different Hebrew phrases, chizuk halev and kibbud halev, which we have rendered as “strengthening of heart” and “hardening of heart,” respectively.

Where does all this begin he asks. In the tale of two speeches, he presented in Chapter 4. Revisit that if you forgot about that. Given what we learned about polytheism earlier, David visits the two speeches and proposes:

But looking at the speeches now, it seems evident that the God of Moses’s first speech is God-as-He-truly-is, whereas the god that Moses presents in the second speech seems to portray the Almighty in terms we might use to describe a mere “power” within a larger pantheon of powers.

David then paraphrases Moses’ second speech:

Let me make things a little easier for you. Forget about that YHVH name that you found so confusing. Let’s at least agree that this god who sent me is no less than an ‘el,’ a power. You know about powers. And forget, at least for the moment, the idea that there’s some sort of precious relationship between this deity and a people He knows by a special name, Israel. Let’s just call them Hebrews. And forget about that whole celebration thing. Let’s just say we’re really worried that our ‘el,’ our power, might get angry with us if we don’t go into the desert to sacrifice to it. You can understand that, can’t you? Arbitrary and capricious deities we must appease with sacrifices, who might strike us down if we don’t obey? You know, sort of like your sun god? All we’re asking for, Pharaoh, is a little religious freedom; a three-day break to appease our god, the same way you would appease yours.

Thus, the education process has begun.

Next, he asks why Moses stooped to lying about a three-day pass rather than letting the slaves go. He concludes that it may not have been lying. If Moses saw the need for an incremental approach to having Pharaoh accept YHVH as Lord of all, perhaps there might have been another step after Israel came back. However, Pharaoh’s response crushed the possibility of a plan A – a non-violent conversion of Pharaoh away from his many gods to YHVH. The educational process will continue but in a much harder way.

Chapter Thirteen – A Journey to Tomorrowland

In this chapter, Fohrman takes us through the plagues – looking in particular at the various hardenings and the use of power versus precision.

I have always been upset that the magicians turn their staffs into serpents. And though I did not pass over that Aaron’s staff swallowed the magicians’ staffs, I did not see it as evidence of monotheism. One God (one staff) is over the many.

He then points out to us something I passed over. After the serpent demonstration, Exodus 7:13 tells us that Pharaoh’s heart was strengthened (chizuk halev). But 7:14 has God telling Moses that his heart was hardened (kibbud halev). Which is it? David says it is a matter of perspective. Pharaoh sees his heart strengthening. God sees Pharaoh hardening his heart.

Yes, Pharaoh might obstinately choose to see this fight as nothing more than a match of dueling magicians. He might believe that hardening his position counts as nothing more than “strengthening his resolve.” But in fact, he is being stubborn. He is blinding himself to a truth he does not want to see. He is hardening his heart, not strengthening it.

The first plague also results in the magicians duplicating it, and again, we see in Exodus 7:22 that Pharaoh’s heart is strengthened.

The frog plague follows, which includes the strange request for precision. Following this plague, we hear for the first time that Pharaoh hardened his heart. What was previously seen as strengthening is now hardening. Fohrman claims that it is because of the precision of the use of power that this YHVH is something different.

He blinds himself to the implications of what he’s just seen, and continues his struggle against the God of the Hebrews. All of a sudden, Pharaoh has a new enemy. It is no longer just Moses, or even Moses’s God, that Pharaoh opposes. He is now at war against the ancient and timeless enemy of all stubborn men: reality itself.

Chapter Fourteen – Escalation

In this chapter, the Rabbi takes us through plagues 3-6. We have seen the blood and the frogs, and now we have the lice, the wild animals, death of livestock, and boils. He sees a pattern (which I obviously passed over) in these plagues. “They are intensifying along alternate lines: power and precision.” The lice mark the end of the astrologers’ ability to duplicate and their acknowledging that it is the finger of Elohim (Exodus 8:15). The power is greater than any of their gods. But still not the power of YHVH. Pharaoh strengthens his heart to this one. Then come the wild animals. The precision is the exact location of the plague. The frogs showed a precision of time. The wild animals a precision of space. Why? “’ So that you shall know that I am YHVH in the midst of the land.’ Precision, in time and space, is the unmistakable signature of the Master of both these realms, YHVH Himself…” Now Pharaoh hardens his heart (Exodus 8:28).

The precision and power axis escalate. Now, the death of the livestock is predicted in time, but the precision in space is further refined. Not just a specific locale, but to the inhabitants within that locale. Just as God “wondrously distinguished” the land of Goshen (Exodus 8:18), now He “wondrously distinguishes” the people of Israel within the land. (Exodus 9:4). Pharaoh’s attention to this precision is caught, and he sends for verification and gets it (Exodus 9:7). No Hebrew livestock is affected. The final escalation is an escalation of power. The power of the plague of boils was so great that the astrologers lost their ability to even stand before Moses. (Exodus 9:11).

In all of these, God did not enter Pharaoh’s heart. In this last plague, God enters the realm of Pharaoh’s heart. Of course, all of this I have passed over.

Chapter 15 – Hail to the King

We read that following the sixth plague, God strengthens Pharaoh’s heart. We have already discussed the commentator’s view that:

God, however, did not wish the Egyptian king to capitulate out of mere expediency. If it was courage that Pharaoh was lacking — well, God would supply him with the courage to pursue his vision.

Enter the seventh plague.

For this time, I will send all My plagues into your heart…so that you shall know there is none like Me in all the world (Exodus 9:13–14)

What does that mean?

The ground to be conquered in this plague is nothing less than Pharaoh’s heart itself.

And it is more than that:

God is telling the Egyptian king that there is a reason he is still here, a reason larger than Pharaoh himself. He is part of a momentous drama — the revelation of the Creator to humankind.

Exodus 9:16 It was only for this that I’ve allowed you to stand: it was to show you My strength, so that My name will be told of, all over the world

Only for this?

Allowed you to stand?

This clearly is a climactic section of the story (which of course I passed over). This seems to be God revealing that there is indeed a Plan C. This plague has a new, unique feature. God gives the Egyptians a way to avoid the plague. (Exodus 9:19). Fohrman claims that this is God’s way of demonstrating His power. He is so assured of His ultimate victory that He can afford to warn His enemy. Not too long ago, when the U.S. attacked Iran, we saw just that. The U.S. gave advanced notice as to when and where they were going to strike. Many questioned this. Yet here is God doing the same thing.

Previously, we mentioned the fire inside the ice. What was it to accomplish? Let’s look at how Pharaoh responds.

And Pharaoh sent and called to Moses and Aaron and said to them: I have sinned this time. YHVH is the righteous One, and my people and I are the wicked ones (Exodus 9:27)

Fohrman points out that this is new and moral language. You don’t sin against impersonal gods. Pharaoh finally acknowledges the personal and moral nature of YHVH. One would think that this would end the story. God has accomplished His goal. But the story is not over. Why? Stay tuned.

Chapter 16 The Desecration of Remorse

After the hail, Fohrman points out that Pharaoh changes his mind yet again. But (no surprise here), there is something I passed over. Fohrman calls it the tipping point of the whole Exodus story. Even though Pharaoh had admitted sin, the Torah says that he sinned. He claims that ignoring evidence is a “subconscious act of resistance.” He claims that this is not a sin. In effect, Fohrman sees Pharaoh saying:

I know there is a Creator, that I am duty bound to listen to Him, and I know what He wants from me. But I just don’t care. I’m keeping my slaves anyway.

This is the essence of sin.

The other unique thing I passed over, Pharaoh both hardened his heart, but he also strengthened his heart. (Exodus 9:34-35). Fohrman  sees this as what he calls the “desecration of remorse.”

Remorse is a noble and sublime product of the free and unfettered human will. Once you cynically mock it, it doesn’t come easily anymore.

Pharaoh will never again see the truth as clearly as he does now.

In the great drama of the Exodus, he has chosen, in effect, no longer to be an actor, but a pawn.

I don’t know about you, but I passed over this major turning point in the great drama.

Fohrman sees this as the beginning of Plan C. God uses language never before seen in the story:

And YHVH said to Moses: Go to Pharaoh — for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his servants, that I might establish My signs in the midst of them. And so that you will be able to tell your children, and your children’s children, how I played with Egypt, and My signs which I have done among them. [I have done this] so that you will know that I am YHVH. (Exodus 10:1–2)

Notice what I passed over. The goal is not so that Pharaoh would know the YHVH is God, but so that the children of Israel would get to know YHVH. Plan C!

And what’s this business about toying with Pharaoh? According to Rabbi David, Pharaoh will have free will for the rest of the story, but God will see to it that Pharaoh “endlessly pursues his lost cause” by toying with him the rest of the story.

Chapter 17 Pharaoh’s Last Refuge

Per Fohrman, Pharaoh has now adopted a “damn the torpedoes” approach to ignoring the stubborn fact that God is the supreme creator. If you doubt man’s ability to act like this, just look at politicians who refuse to acknowledge the polls (or even the votes) in an election. Stubbornness can soon become a fortress as he will soon see. We mentioned that normally, Pharaoh has been hardening his heart. But at this transition, now we see God hardening Pharaoh’s heart. (Exodus 10:1). And this will not end well for Pharaoh. As Fohrman says:

Denial of reality is never a strength; it’s always a weakness.

I was once confronted by a dear friend about something I had supposedly done. But when I brought up the facts, he said, “I don’t care about the facts.” I was shocked. This was a “Joe Friday” kind of guy – “Just the facts, ma’am!” As John Adams once famously said: “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” And for Pharaoh, denial of the reality of YHVH will catch up to him.

Normally, we think of God hardening Pharaoh’s heart as some kind of supernatural internal move of God on Pharaoh’s heart. But perhaps not, says David.

Maybe God was making use of an entirely natural process to influence Pharaoh. Maybe God was using Pharaoh’s own stubbornness against him as a weapon that would force the Egyptian king deeper and deeper into a prison of his own making.

He points us to Exodus 10:3:

And Moses and Aaron came to Pharaoh and said to him: Thus says YHVH, the God of the Hebrews, ‘How long will you withhold yourself from bowing in submission before Me? Send out my people that they may serve Me!’ (Exodus 10:3)

This is quite a bold way to speak to the most powerful leader in the world. Any chance this will work? Not with Plan B or Plan A. But:

God has declared that he would “harden Pharaoh’s heart” (Exodus 10:1), and this is exactly how He is going about it. In Plan C, God has a secret weapon. It is nothing fancy, nothing supernatural; the secret weapon is Pharaoh’s own pride, the root cause of his stubbornness.

From now on, Pharaoh’s pride will be God’s primary target.

After Pharaoh’s servants pleaded with him to let the Hebrews go, Torah tells us that Moses and Aaron “were returned” to Pharaoh. By whom? Some kind of “Deep Throat” within Pharaoh’s servants? Of course, you can imagine that I passed over that detail.

Pharaoh offers a face-saving question to Moses that could have allowed Pharaoh to save face. But Plan C would not allow that. And Moses is sent packing, and the locusts are sent plundering.

With the next plague, Moses is summoned back and again offered a way for Pharaoh to save face. Just leave some cattle. Moses response? Absolutely not! You are going to provide us with the cattle for our sacrifices. This ticks off Pharaoh, who threatens Moses with death if he ever sees his face around here again.

Okay. Are you tired of me telling you what I passed over? Hold on. This plague has a major miss. I never noticed that the last plague (death of the firstborn) did not exempt the Hebrews automatically, as did all of the other plagues. Why? Stay tuned.

Chapter 18 Birth Night

David starts this chapter with a question asked earlier. Why did God call Israel his “firstborn” even before the first plague? And what is the significance? He proposes a possibility in the form of a question: What if Israel was not His firstborn but was to become His firstborn?

Fohrman develops the concept of the bechor (firstborn) as the one in the family who transmits the family values to the rest of the children. On the night of the last plague, Israel became a nation and accepted the role of the bechor. And it did it through the blood of the goat. All of God’s children (including Egypt) are in God’s family. But you choose to become part of it. This is why the holiday is called Passover and not Freedom Day.

Passover looks at the events of the Exodus as significant not in terms of history but in terms of destiny. When you think about becoming free, you think about where you are now, in relation to an awful past. When you think about becoming a bechor, you think about where you are now, in relation to the future you must help bring into being.

Chapter 19 Creation and Uncreation

In this chapter, Rabbi David attempts to explain why the Jewish sages portray fruit trees on both sides of the walls of water as the Hebrews pass through the Sea of Reeds on dry land. He points us to four parallels between the Exodus Sea of Reeds crossing and the Creation story.

Creation (Genesis 1) Exodus
Spirit moving across the  waters Wind is blowing to separate the water
Let there be light to separate the light from the darkness Pillar lit up the night (14:20)
Sky divides water from water Sky divides water from water (14:22)
Let dry land appear Water recedes and dry land appears

 

But the next thing missing from the creation story is the vegetation – the fruit trees. So the sages put them there. But what does this mean? No question I passed this one over, but Fohrman says that by this parallel, God was ratifying His role as Creator.

Okay!?

As the Egyptian army is crushed under the wall of water, Plan C draws to a close.

Preface to Part IV

The Exodus that Might Have Been

Fohrman supposes:

Even if we were to accept that Plan A or B had originally been on the table, should we care that those plans never materialized? Was it not enough that the entire nation of Israel came to know YHVH? What, if anything, was lost when those plans failed to come to fruition? And if something terribly important was lost, is that loss permanent? Is there some sort of unrealized potential in the Exodus whose loss we should mourn, or perhaps seek to recapture?

Part IV Joseph and the Phantom Exodus

Chapter 20 – All the King’s Horses

Of course, David starts with something I missed (see, I don’t always have to say passed over).

And I (YHVH) will strengthen the heart of Pharaoh, … and he will chase after you. (Exodus 14:4)

Thanks, God! But what really bothers David that I truly passed over (“There you go again”), is that God says He is going to derive honor by killing Pharaoh’s army. If that doesn’t bother you, you can stop reading.

But the Sages of the Talmud recognize the problem and have a scene where the angels want to sing and celebrate this great victory, but God says, “My own creations [the Egyptians] are drowning in the Sea, and you want to sing before Me? (Megillah 10b).” What is going on here? Which is it? Did the Sages get it wrong, or are we interpreting the verse incorrectly?

Before David answers this, he wants to take us on a journey back to the story of Jacob’s burial. Buckle your seat belt.

Chapter 21 – A Moment of Truth

The lynch pin of this piece of the puzzle comes from Genesis 50:8:

And the whole house of Joseph, his brothers, and his father’s house [all went up to bury Jacob]; only their little children, their sheep and their cattle did they leave behind in the Land of Goshen (Genesis 50:8)

Herein lies the big takeaway from this book. It has to do with the way I read the Bible. I feel like I have always skim-read it when I am with Rabbi Fohrman. Take a minute and see if you can see what I passed over in that passage.

Ready? Why do we care about the child-care provisioning for Jacob’s burial?

Through a series of fine points that I clearly missed (Hey – this isn’t the Exodus story anymore – or is it?), Fohrman builds several points:

    1. Oddly, Jacob makes Joseph swear that he would bury him with his fathers in Canaan.
    2. Oddly, Jacob did not realize that Joseph remained loyal until this moment.
    3. Jacob had concerns about Joseph’s loyalty despite significant evidence to the contrary
    4. This odd request uncovers an intriguing triangle between Joseph, Pharaoh, and Jacob.

Ah – but you need to read on to unravel this intrigue.

Chapter 22 – The Triangle

Rabbi Fohrman raises some troubling questions about Joseph in this chapter:

    1. Why did Joseph never write home during his stay in Egypt? One rabbi suggested that Joseph may have been the victim of a terrible misunderstanding.
    2. What did Joseph know about what his brothers told his father?
    3. Assuming nothing, what misunderstanding about what happened might Joseph come to?
    4. After Jacob got mad at Joseph for the dreams, he sent him on a dangerous trip. Why did Jacob send Joseph to check on his brothers? What misunderstanding did Joseph have about that?
    5. Given what Joseph knew, why didn’t Dad send out a search party?
    6. From all this, is it unreasonable for Joseph to think he was thrown out of the family?
    7. What role did the precedence of throwing Ismael out of the family play in Joseph’s speculations?
    8. Why does the Torah use the word “pit” (same as where Joseph was thrown) to describe what Pharaoh pulled Joseph out of? Could it be that the Torah is painting an inverse chiasmus?:
      • A Father rejects the dream’s interpretation
        • B Stripped of Clothes
          • C Thrown in a pit
          • C Extracted from the pit
        • B Given new clothes
      • A Pharaoh accepts dream interpretation

Fohrman brings up Joseph’s allegiance to his family compared to his new family (Pharaoh). He never questioned Joseph’s allegiance to YHVH. This seems to be confirmed by the naming of his first child (okay – I won’t mention it): “God has caused me to forget my travails, and all my father’s house” (Genesis 41:51). All of these speculations could explain the inexplicable way Joseph initially toys with his brothers.

Chapter 23 – The Land of Nearness

Playing on the theory that Joseph believed his father Jacob had thrown him out, Fohrman has Judah’s speech (Genesis 44) turn Joseph’s world around. He puts these words in Joseph’s head:

This whole time, my father thought I was dead! For all these years, Father had somehow been deceived. He never threw me out of the family, no! Every moment I’ve been away, he has been mourning me…

This chapter provides us with the background of Jacob’s request to Joseph. We see:

    1. God spoke to Jacob on the way to Egypt that he need not fear. We didn’t know that Jacob was afraid. (Genesis 46:3)
    2. Joseph deeded (ancestral holdings) the land of Goshen to Jacob’s family – they were not just visitors (Genesis 47:11) but now landowners.
    3. Jacob whined about not having settled in Canaan as God had told him in his discussion with Pharaoh. (Genesis 47:9)

All this helps us understand that Jacob is wondering how we will ever get back to Canaan – our destiny.

Chapter 24 – Fence of Thorns

We now know why Jacob requires an oath that he be buried in Canaan. Jacob was saying in so many words:

Look, Son, Egypt is nice, and Pharaoh is very gracious — but, at the end of the day, Egypt is not our place. Home is Canaan, the land God promised to us. That is where our family has an achuzah waiting for us, an ancestral holding…. Are you on board with that vision?

Another point Fohrman makes is that Jacob, being the father of the savior of Egypt (Joseph), meant that he was royalty (he was mourned for 70 days by all of Egypt – Genesis 50:3 – following his death). His funeral will be a state funeral. Burying him in Canaan would be like burying Queen Elizabeth in Madagascar.

He closes with an account from the Talmud that is so loosely based on the Torah that we will skip it.

Chapter 25 – A Conversation, Delayed

David gives us a little background about embalming. For the Egyptians, burying an embalmed body would make no sense. Embalming is to prepare the body for the afterlife. We learn that Joseph waited until after the mourning to tell Pharaoh about his promise to his father. Even then, he didn’t speak directly to Pharaoh but asked members of the court to talk to Pharaoh. It certainly appears as if Joseph is afraid to tell Pharaoh about Jacob’s request.

Chapter 26 – Honor Guard

Much to everyone’s surprise (Pharaoh, his court, Joseph, and even the residents of Canaan), Egypt sends an honor guard to attend the family for the burial. It must have looked odd to all involved. And yet, now it is time to tie this forward to the story of Exodus.

Chapter 27 – Take the Long Way Home

Fohrman provides 3 connections back to the Exodus in this chapter:

    1. Both took the long way around to get to Canaan[5]
    2. Both involved child-care arrangements (Genesis 50:8)
    3. In both, Pharaoh dispatches chariots and archers (50:9)
    4. Both had the Canaanites looking on

Thankfully, David doesn’t leave us there.

The Torah appears to be asking the reader to line up and connect these two journeys from Egypt. But why?

Why indeed? Maybe, he proposes, the two stories are, in essence, the same. Huh?

Chapter 28 – Convergence

He takes us back to Plan A. Just let us go out and celebrate YHVH. What if Pharaoh had responded positively to Plan A? Here is where we see the convergence.

The stories of Jacob’s burial and the Exodus really do converge; their essential theme is one and the same. In each, a grand procession was supposed to take place, to honor Father the way Father wanted to be honored.

In this chapter:

… we retold the story of Jacob’s burial and the story of the Exodus from the “child’s” perspective in each story: how Joseph acquitted himself in the great choice facing him, and, centuries later, how the Children of Israel made their choice in the decision facing them.

In a lengthy section, David ties the two stories together. I leave it to you, the reader, to do it yourself – or buy the book.

But it doesn’t end there. The stories don’t converge except in our minds as rejected Plan A. Why do they diverge? Stay tuned.

Chapter 29 – Divergence

A successful Plan A would have resulted in Pharaoh saying at the first sign:

There’s a deeper parent than me, and these Hebrews owe Him their allegiance. That parent wants them back, for His own purposes. How can I stand in the way of that?

And just as the first Pharaoh sent Egypt out to honor Jacob, he would have sent an entourage to honor this father.

In the end, Joseph’s Pharaoh didn’t just go along with the idea of the burial procession; he wanted Egypt to be part of it. He sent dignitaries, multitudes of Egyptians, a military escort of chariots and archers, to accompany the burial procession. It didn’t matter that Israel wasn’t doing things the Egyptian way. Jacob was their father, too.

Now we have a deeper insight into our question: What does it mean for God to be honored by the presence of Pharaoh’s army? God had intended to be honored in Plan A as Jacob was honored. So the chariots and archers will come and bow before Me. And honor Me.

I shall be honored through Pharaoh and all his army; through his chariots and through his archers (Exodus 14:17)

The Exodus was supposed to be a uniting of Gentile and Jew. But Pharaoh made it a dividing line in the sand. Genesis 50:9 and Exodus 14:20 show how one camp has become two camps.

Chapter 30 – The Unfinished Journey

Rabbi Fohrman concludes that the Torah was painting an Exodus that could have been a guide to us.

Judaism has always insisted that the Torah wasn’t written to be merely a history book. Instead, the Torah is meant to be a guidebook. That is what the name Torah implies: it teaches. It guides. Sometimes the Torah guides by telling us laws. Sometimes it guides by telling us stories about our past.

The Exodus is not just a story about setting slaves free and birthing a nation.

Exodus was about other things as well. It was about a Father who, like Jacob long ago, needed to make His presence known to a child. It was about a potential bechor (firstborn), who, like Joseph, had to summon reservoirs of strength to recognize that Father as his own, deepest parent. It was about a nation, Egypt, who had to recognize, like Joseph’s Pharaoh long ago, that this was their Father, too, and act accordingly.

But also, it teaches us about the future:

It will be the destiny of Jew and Gentile to one day realize the promise of that journey as it should have taken place: to march side by side and join hands, proclaiming in unison the oneness of a Father they both share. (See Isaiah 56:6-8)

Appendix A – God, Moses, and the Worst-Case Scenario

Appropriately, David starts with something I passed over in this entire book. He tells us that one of the things he is trying to teach us in this book is not to read the Bible with the end in mind. He calls that folly. Read the Bible without presupposing how it is going to end. You will find things you would otherwise have missed.

Since God foretold Moses that Pharaoh would not let Israel go at the burning bush without a strong show of force on God’s part, how can we not read the story with its ending in Plan C as a foregone conclusion? How can there even be a Plan A? Using Jonah as one example

I’d like to suggest that, strange as it may seem, the “mere” fact that the Almighty broadcasts a future occurrence to one or more human beings does not mean that those events must, of necessity, occur.

He goes on to provide some guidance from Rabbi Rambam:

Rambam writes that if the prophecy the person delivers foretells some future act of compassion, mercy or beneficence on the part of God, and this event does not materialize, then the supposed prophet is surely a charlatan, because God would never renege on a promise of good tidings. If, however, the prophecy promises bad tidings — famine, destruction, or the like — then the failure of the prophecy to materialize cannot be taken as evidence that the prophet is a liar. This is so even if the prophecy of bad tidings was given unconditionally, because, Rambam argues, there is no such thing as an unconditional promise of bad tidings; the possibility of reversal always exists, even if the prophet doesn’t explicitly state this.

Why tell Moses in the worst-case scenario if Plan A is the real plan? Because it allows for free will on the part of Pharaoh, and not to discourage Moses. If Plan A had worked out, do you think Moses would have gotten upset as Jonah did? In effect, God is saying:

Don’t worry, I’ll take care of it, no matter what. Even if everything else we try here fails, I have the ability to do this unilaterally. You need not fear a thing.

Fohrman concludes:

on rare occasions in biblical history, God may prophetically warn someone of a worst-case scenario, to help the prophet, or future generations, withstand that worst-case scenario, should it ever come to pass.

Appendix B – One Coat, Two Coats

Previously, David brought up the fact that Joseph had two coats. One reason for this is from the Torah, which says that the bechor (firstborn) should receive a double portion. And if that is true, it means that Jacob was treating Joseph as the bechor. This isn’t as unusual as it sounds since Joseph was the firstborn of Rachel – Jacob’s “1st” wife.

However, the Torah expressly addresses this issue in Deuteronomy 21. But it has some strange phrases that don’t make a lot of sense. And those strange phrases show up in the Genesis 37:32 story. Perhaps the brothers brought the 2nd coat to Jacob and, using the same phrasing as Deuteronomy 21:17, asked Jacob, “Shouldn’t this coat belong to Reuben?”

Rabbi Fohrman uses this to show that the Torah was declaring that Jacob considered Joseph his bechor – or firstborn.

Notes:

[1] The four sections of the Torah that command the Hebrews to place the following inside the tefillin are:

    • Kadesh (Exodus 13:1-10): The duty to remember the redemption from Egypt.
    • Vehayah Ki Yeviacha (Exodus 13:11-16): The obligation to instruct children regarding this commandment and the law of the broken necked donkey.
    • Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-9): The declaration of the unity of God and the commandment to bind them.
    • Vehayah Im Shamoa (Deuteronomy 11:13-21): The assurance of reward for following the commandments.

[2] 1Every firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb, or if you will not redeem it you shall break its neck.

 

[3] Exodus 8:15, 32 (Pharoah); 9:7, 34 (passive – was hardened). 10:1 (God)

[4] Exodus 4:21; 9:12; 10:20, 27; 11:10; 14:4,8,17; (God); 7:13; 7:22; 8:19; 9:35; (passive)

[5] He notes that the burial party stopped on the east of the Jordan. He tells us that if we look at the geography, this means that they really went the long way around. It reminds us of what? The Exodus.

Book Summary of The Expectation Gap by Steven Cuss

The Expectation Gap: The Tiny, Vast Space between our Beliefs  & Experiences of God

by Steve Cuss

Without question, one of the top ten books I have ever read on spiritual formation. His questions alone are worth the price of the book.

Introduction – Gaps and Traps

Steve claims that many of us struggle with a gap between what we believe about God and what we experience from God.

Steve believes that there are three gaps:

    • I believe God loves me, but I don’t feel it.
    • I believe God is with me, but I don’t see him.
    • I thought I’d be further along by now.

Ask yourself this: Do you truly experience the benefits Jesus said you would get when you follow him? Sit with God with that question.

Steve said: “I have found that if I can encounter God’s peace, freedom and love even 10 or 15 percent of the day, it can be transformative.”

Deepest versus Most Precious Beliefs

Steve said: “I discovered that I hold beliefs even deeper and more foundational to me than my belief in Jesus.”

Take some time in Jesus’ presence with this question:

Jesus, what are the beliefs that I hold more deeply than my belief in You.

Indented texts are quotes from the book.

Chapter 1 – Our False Reality

Steve starts us out with:

Our assumptions about ourselves play a critical role in creating and maintaining the gaps between our expectations and experience of God.

He also claims that the same dynamics that infect our friendships, marriages, and families also impact our relationship with God.

Steve says that we have two core relationships in our lives: God and ourselves. If you make one simple shift in each of these relationships, your capacity to experience God will expand.

These two shifts and four dynamics will help increase our capacity for connectedness and also increase our awareness of when we are disconnected.

Shifts:

Shift #1 Put Yourself on Your List of Your Relationships

The first shift is simple enough: we need to add ourselves to our conscious list of relationships. It may sound odd at first, but one key reason we struggle to connect to God is that we are often profoundly disconnected from ourselves. We simply do not see ourselves as one of our core relationships. If someone asked you who is in your family, you would list your immediate family, of course, but I’m guessing you would be down to your great-uncles and second cousins once removed before you ever think to include yourself.

I speak to myself in a way I would never speak to a friend. Up until a few years ago, I frequently called myself a “moron” or “stupid” without any regard for myself. I tell myself to get over it and suck it up, but I would never do that to someone I love.

Here are some signs Steve gives that you have not put yourself on your conscious list of relationships:

    • You are there for others, but you struggle to ask for help for yourself.
    • You are very patient with others but highly impatient with yourself.
    • Your inner critic speaks so loudly that you cannot hear the compliments of others.

How are we ever going to relax into the love and presence of God if we allow our inner voice to run the show?

The more I allow myself to be exactly human-sized, the more I bump into God, making space for God instead of filling the space with my incessant need to do or to people-please or to rush in.

#1 Tool in the book: take seriously your relationship with yourself, and care for yourself the way you care for the people you love.

Treat yourself with the same kindness and courtesy you give to others. Check in with yourself the way you check in with your friends and family. Ask yourself, How are you? and wait until you know the answer.

When we put ourselves on our conscious list of relationships, two foundational shifts happen:

        1. We learn to be as kind to ourselves as God is to us, and thus our inner chatter begins to line up with God’s truth; and
        2. We discover that we can connect with God because we have paused long enough to “be still, and know” that God is God (Psalm 46:10). We become aware of the ways in which all that is within us is blocking our capacity to notice God.

Shift #2: See Your Relationship with God the Way You See Your Relationship with Others

The second shift has to do with the way we see our relationship with God. I am asking you to see your relationship with God the way you see your relationships with other humans.

What might it look like to relate to God in the same way you relate to people? Spend some time in Jesus’ presence with that question.

Core Relational Dynamics [with God and with Others]

 1. Assumptions

Assumptions are the way we make meaning out of something we think we know but do not actually know. Knowing / Being aware of what our assumptions are is the starting point.

There are no true assumptions. There are assumptions that are true – but you don’t know it. If they were true they would not be assumptions.

Lord, what assumptions am I making about you?

I think I have no assumptions about You – but I ask You to reveal any as the week goes on.

2 . Reactivity

When we do not get what we think we need in a given situation, we get reactive.

How can you know your reactivity? You can begin by noticing three signals:

        1. your anger
        2. your shame
        3. your core values.

What makes you angry? What quickly fills you with shame? What happens when someone violates one of your core values? What do you do next? Welcome to your reactivity.

When we are filled with reactivity, we get either bigger or smaller than human-sized.

3. Stuck Patterns

When talking about stuck patterns, Steve writes:

I certainly don’t pause and ask God for God’s insight on the matter.

I have a stuck pattern (concerning my dismissal) and I do pause and I have asked for insight, and I am still stuck in this pattern.

He claims in his case it is a stuck pattern based on assumptions. Are there assumptions in my case?

He recommends changing your side of the stuck pattern – but in my case I don’t see it as their problem at all.

Or do I?  Yes, it is. I assume that they need to change/repent/confess/admit lying / change. “It’s me that has to change.” That is a path I will try.

Stuck patterns are powerful; they keep us disconnected, expending energy that is unproductive.

Yes, powerful – but they do not keep me disconnected, but definitely expending unproductive energy.

We are often more intent on winning than loving, being heard than listening, protecting yourself from harm than healing the relationship.

4. Attempted Solutions

This is the weakest dynamic. Family therapist Jay Haley famously told his clients, “I don’t address problems; I address attempted solutions.”

Some problems are actually made worse by our attempted solutions.

For example, someone posts an inflammatory statement on social media, and you become reactive. But you do not know you are reactive. Your reactivity is generated by assumptions you hold about yourself and the person who posted-that person clearly needs to be corrected, and I’m the one to do it. You do not realize you are operating out of assumption and reactivity. You are just living your one wild and precious life. But your brain is deceived in that moment. You are no longer able to see reality, and you become infected by reactivity. So you comment on their post with a corrective response. It may be very direct, or it may be couched in soft language. You believe your comment will help the poster see the error of their ways, or maybe you just enjoy putting people in their place. Whatever your motive, your comment is an attempted solution.

After you reply with your corrective comment, the thread quickly devolves into something like a playground argument. Assumptions and reactivity fly around wildly, and everyone on the thread catches them like viruses. This whole situation is a stuck pattern.

Summary of the Chapter and Questions – Dispelling the Illusion

We bring assumptions, reactivity, stuck patterns, and attempted solutions into our relationship with God that keep us from encountering God because they put us in a false reality

Some of the challenges in our relationship with God come from God’s side:

        • He is invisible
        • He speaks intermittently
        • Jesus said he was coming back soon – 2000 years ago – that sows seeds of doubt
        • We believe God is all-powerful and also all-loving and all-knowing, but God does not intervene as often as we would like or in the ways we would like. God can do so but doesn’t.
        • When we live in reality and truth, we can more easily access God’s presence.

Questions

    1. What do you think of the idea of putting yourself on your list of relationships?
    2. How might being kind to yourself help you encounter God’s kindness?
    3. What assumptions do you hold about God or about yourself that might be blocking your connection with God.
    4. What situations make you reactive? Do you typically get bigger or smaller than human-sized?
    5. When you are reactive, do you struggle to notice God’s presence?
    6. Can you name any stuck patterns you see in your faith or in your human relationships?
    7. Attempted solutions can be hard to identify. Do any attempted solutions come to mind?

Chapter 2  Relaxing into God’s Presence

If you want to connect deeply with God, you first have to connect deeply with yourself.

Focusing on myself was painful. But how can I empty myself, deny myself, and die to self if I am completely unaware of myself?

TOOLS TO OPEN YOUR SOUL TO GOD

Pause

Pause long enough to increase awareness—awareness of yourself and of God. Do you know what is going on in you? Can you articulate it to God or to someone else?

Radical Acceptance

I am certainly much harsher to myself than I would ever be to another person. What would it look like if you radically accepted yourself?

Permission

There is a problem when we: refuse to give myself permission to be human or to feel my feelings.

To grow out of being hurt is to grow out of being human.

Curiosity

Curiosity helps us locate assumptions and keep judgment in check. It helps us explore what is beyond what we think we know for sure.

Testing Assumptions

Over and over, Jesus said, “You have heard that it was said . . . But I tell you . . .” (see Matthew 5:21–48). Might this be the path to spiritual transformation?

Reflection and Debriefing

Jesus used Action-Reflection-Action most famously when he sent out his disciples two by two (see Mark 6:7).

See my: Do and Observe Sermon

Laughter and Playfulness

Laughter and playfulness are drastically underutilized in spiritual growth.

Laughter increases my capacity to do difficult work.

Time

The tools in this book are designed to unlock some deep changes that take time to forge.

Intentionality

I recommend intentionally cultivating the practice of relaxing into God’s presence in the morning and evening, as well as cultivating the tools and postures above.

End of Chapter Questions

    1. What intense situations have revealed to you what is bubbling underneath the surface in your life? What was that revelation like for you?
    2. As you consider the way you treat your loved ones versus the way you treat yourself, what differences or similarities do you find?
    3. What could change for you if you began to treat yourself kindly?
    4. Where have you seen anxiety become contagious within a group?
    5. Which of the postures and tools can you try this week?
    6. Which of the postures and tools do you think you will struggle with the most?

Chapter 3 Gap 1: God’s Particular Love “I believe God loves me but I don’t feel it.”

It is difficult, isn’t it, to experience God’s love?

The most likely obstacles we face in encountering God’s particular love for us are The Stories We Tell Ourselves.

Our inner critic is the voice of condemnation that speaks anytime we let ourselves down, anytime we do not live up to our own standards.

To stand and receive God’s unconditional love without pretense is scary.

My inner critic has four core, recurring messages:

        1. You should know better by now.
        2. You are stupid and exposed.
        3. You cannot do it.
        4. You are not worth loving.

Does your inner critic’s view of you contradict God’s view of you?

As long as The Stories We Tell Ourselves and The Way Things Are remain unexamined, unexposed, and unspoken, we will struggle to encounter God’s love

Our deepest core beliefs can be difficult to uncover because they are subconscious. They have been with us since our early memories, and they are fierce in protecting us from pain or lack.

So as adults, we have been living with them and depending on them for decades without considering their negative impact or whether they are even true.

Our inner critic is one of several task force members within our soul who serve on The Stories We Tell Ourselves committee. We may or may not be aware of this committee. The members mostly work undercover, but together they create two core messages:

        • The Stories We Tell Ourselves
        • The Way Things Are

These messages are a complex web of untested assumptions and thinking patterns that form our deepest core beliefs. The committee means well. It exists and speaks to protect us from vulnerability and hurt, and is forged from experience, especially childhood experience.

As mentioned, our inner critic serves on this committee. Who else is there? Each of us has a few members in common

The Stories We Tell Ourselves Committee

Your Unique Members

Steve identified some of his committee members:

    1. I call one of them the “it’s all downhill from here
    2. Another member serves as my prayer editor.
    3. Some operate as soldiers … These soldiers reported for duty after a significant trauma or abuse in our past. They struggle to discern true threats from perceived threats; they trigger us in both, blocking out love and connection from healing humans and from God.

Who are the committee members that are unique to you? Take some time in God’s presence and identify them.

Our Common Committee Members

We’ve already mentioned the inner critic

Family of origin propagandist – takes assumptions and beliefs from family of origin and make them core beliefs. His family of origin feeds two basic messages:

        1. Cusses don’t ask for help. They help others
        2. Others have it worse. Don’t complain.

Childhood agreement officer –  The problem is, we become adults and no longer need these hyper-vigilant protective mechanisms.

Sifting Our Beliefs

Let’s get into the core messages.

      • God is busy helping those who need it more than me.
      • My problems are not really problems.
      • I must be self-sufficient; I can never be weak or vulnerable.
      • My feelings are not valid; I do not have the rights to them.
      • Strong people figure it out on their own.
      • People must see me as smart for me to be okay and for the world to be okay.
      • God loves me generically, not specifically. God loves me as just another generic person because that is God’s job

My brain says there’s no way I could actually believe the list, but my actions, my deepest thinking, and my fear offers counter-evidence.

In what ways do you live your life or see the world that keep you from being vulnerable and exposed?

The Tangible Love of God

I am simply suggesting that we all can choose life over self-condemnation. It is much better news. I propose that we place our faith in something more reliable than our own opinions.

If we do that long enough, over time God’s love will become as tangible as The Stories We Tell Ourselves, and we will discover the story that has been guiding us and speaking to us for decades is not as reliable or true as we assumed it was.

Questions for Discussion

    1. What committee members are you aware of in your life? Can you name a couple of them specifically?
    2. What might be an aspect of The Stories We Tell Ourselves that you would like to examine?
    3. What positive message have you inherited that might become a stronghold? (For example, being responsible is a good trait, but always being responsible for everyone’s experience is a stronghold.)
    4. What negative experiences or messages would you like to explore?
    5. Would you like to explore trauma or abuse with the help of a professional? (You can seek out a local church or go to psychologytoday.com and search for “Christian, Trauma,” in your city.)
    6. If you are ready to do so, list some core beliefs about yourself, the world, or God that might be blocking your capacity to receive God’s love.

Chapter 4 Containing the Inner Critic

For grace to be grace, it must give us things we didn’t know we needed and take us places where we didn’t want to go. Kathleen Norris,  Acedia[1] & Me

The biblical narratives rarely give us insight into what people are thinking or feeling. It normally tells us what they are doing. An example can be seen in Luke 22 describing Peter’s denial:

59 And after an interval of about an hour still another insisted, saying, “Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean.” 60 But Peter said, “Man, I do not know what you are talking about.” And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed. 61 And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, “Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.” 62 And he went out and wept bitterly.

Steve points out that the Scripture doesn’t tell us what Jesus was thinking. What do you think Jesus was thinking? Your answer will reveal some assumptions about how you see God and Jesus. Steve goes on:

In most Bible stories, we project thoughts and feelings onto the people. If we pay attention to these projections, we can learn about our assumptions… assumptions put us in a false reality, and truth sets us free.

When Steve asked this question to hundreds of people, the most common answers are “disappointment,” “betrayal,” “anger,” “sadness,” and “hurt.”’ He then asks: “Why don’t we see love and forgiveness?”

What is the difference between the voice of our inner critic and the voice of the Holy Spirit? Our inner critic condemns and the Holy Spirit convicts. Our inner critic blames and condemns us at our core identity level; the Holy Spirit addresses our behavior and thoughts. Our inner critic keeps us stuck with no path to redemption; the Holy Spirit offers repentance, repair, forgiveness, and a path to relief.

Tool: Containing the Voice of Your Inner Critic

You cannot stop your inner critic from coming to work and from speaking, but over time, you can consciously choose to let God have the final word.

Write down some of the messages of your inner critic

What do you think your inner critic needs? How might you invite it to stand down?

Fill in the blank in the following sentence: What if I were at least as ______________________________ to myself as God is?

Read 1 John 3:19-20 in The Message

This is the only way we’ll know we’re living truly, living in God’s reality. It’s also the way to shut down debilitating self-criticism, even when there is something to it. For God is greater than our worried hearts and knows more about us than we do ourselves.

This simple table can help silence the inner critic. When we compare the descriptions of the “gospel” of our inner critic to the true gospel of God, we see the stark contrast.

List Adjectives that Your Inner Critic Uses about You and those the Gospel Uses
Inner Critic Gospel

 

Tools: Other Committee Members

 Childhood Agreements Officer

Childhood agreements can be conscious or unconscious. Their general themes are protection and pain avoidance. We can forge them from one incident, but often they come from a series of incidents

Childhood agreements can take time to locate. It is okay if you are not ready to try the tools on this page; feel free to come back to them when you are.

 Name an event or a series of events that may have generated a childhood agreement.

What agreement did you make with yourself to protect yourself from future harm?

Fill in the blanks in the following sentence that describes a childhood agreement. I will __________ so that ____________ will never happen again.

Where do you see this agreement keeping you stuck as an adult?

Compare your agreement with what is true about God.

Family of Origin Propagandist

 List three or four assumptions or expectations you have inherited from your family of origin.

What are a couple of assets and a couple of liabilities you carry from your family of origin?

What meaning have you made about yourself from those?

What meaning have you made about God from those?

As you compare the meaning you made from your childhood agreements and family of origin with the gospel of God, is it true?

 Tool: The First and Final Word

 If Steve was ever summoned before the King of England, there are certain rules he would have to follow. One is that the king has the first and final word.

For followers of Christ, God is our sovereign King, but too often we let our inner critic get the first and final word. It takes faith and practice to live in such a way that God has the first and final word in our lives. We give more weight to what [the inner critics] say than what God says.

How Steve found to silence the inner critic

For a couple of years, I tried to stop my inner critic from speaking. I tried to fire it one time, but the next day it still showed up to work. That is the insidious nature of the committee

Now I let my inner critic say its piece, but I no longer give it the final word. I do not eliminate my inner critic’s voice; I contain it with the truth of God.

I’ve been living by faith—faith that God knows better than me. God’s first and final words orient my days. My inner critic still yammers, and I let it say its piece, but once the word has been spoken, I intentionally frame its word between God’s good words.

Chapter 5 Gap 2: God’s Visceral Presence “I Believe God Is with Me, but I Don’t See Him”

Everything I’ve ever let go of has claw marks on it. DAVID FOSTER WALLACE

Steve describes how some movies and television shows (The Sixth Sense, The Sting, Homeland) use an unreliable narrator to engage us with the story. He goes on to say: “An unreliable narrator is exactly like it sounds – the voice in a story that tells us what’s going on is giving false or misleading information.” He tells us that we have a narrator in our lives. And the narrator is powerful. For example, when someone compliments us, the narrator will say: “That’s not true. He tells everyone that.”

The false narrator in our lives makes us aware of false needs. Things we don’t really need but the narrator convinces us or tries to convince us that we need them.

“When we look at them soberly, we know they are false, but in the moment, our narrator is awfully convincing that they are true needs and that we are in danger if we don’t acquire them.  … Unreliable narrators are one reason why we stay in stuck patterns for years. One way you can measure your unreliable narrator is to notice how it exaggerates the stakes if you do not get your false need.”

The Big Five Core False Needs

1. Control

He provides some examples – but I am not connecting with them. His examples are people who lead meetings where someone steers the meeting in the wrong direction.  When a control freak goes out to eat, and someone suggests a restaurant the control freak knows will be a bad experience, they try to shift the opinion for the better good. They need people to behave in a certain way. When they don’t get their false need of control met, they get anxious.  Perhaps I have a false need to control. I don’t think so.

Here are some better (IMHO) examples of control freaks:

      1. Constantly criticizing others
      2. Needing to win at all costs
      3. Having difficulty delegating tasks
      4. They may also exhibit perfectionism, become easily irritated
      5. Struggle with maintaining healthy relationships

 

2. Perfectionism

Again, his examples do not hit home with me.

      1. Believe they need to get it perfect the first time
      2. Don’t see the good in their work – I could have done it better
      3. They get an A but in their heart know that it is a B-
      4. They need others to know that they can do better

Here are some better ones (again IMHO)

    1. A perfectionist never completes something
    2. A perfectionist has a hard time sending off the letter, the article, or the software.

3. Knowing the Answer

You need others to know that you know the answer

4. Being there for others

You need to be there for others who are hurting.

5. Approval

Craving the approval of others

We spend too much of our time living in someone else’s brain. What are they thinking? What do they think of me? Disrespect is a huge trigger.

Summary of the Big 5 (Five Core False Needs)

Where do you find yourself in the Big 5? Perhaps you look at this list and think, I’m doomed. I am all five. If you see yourself in all five, take heart.  … You can be free. Your first step is to discern which of the Big 5 is foundational for you.

ACUTE AND CHRONIC ANXIETY

Detangling true needs from false needs can be difficult but fruitful work, and it begins by locating ourselves in the Big 5. Technically what we are doing is detangling our acute anxiety from our chronic anxiety.

Acute: When we have a true need that is not being filled.

Chronic: When we are not in real danger. It is based on a false need.

Chronic anxiety does not dissipate on its own; it has to be displaced. … It pushes us to strive for something we can never achieve.

THE FIRST TEMPTATION

Five impossible goals:

      1. We will never be in control;
      2. We will never do it perfectly;
      3. We will never know all there is to know;
      4. We will never be there for everyone in need
      5. We will never get everyone to like us
      6. The 5 Core False Needs are Five Core Traits of God

God is in control;

      1. God does it perfectly;
      2. God  knows all there is to know;
      3. God can be there for everyone in need
      4. God gives us approval

Our false needs stem from our need to be like God – original sin

It is difficult to notice God when we are trying to be like God.

Each of the Big 5 has a human-sized equivalent.

Our Big 5 false needs are typically the twisted extremes of our gifting. … Anytime we try to carry more than God designed us to carry, we become filled with chronic anxiety.

Most people do not know they are anxious until they experience an extreme level of anxiety

I was anxious in 2001 but had no clue until my heart started misfiring. Since then, periodically my heart starts misfiring, and I know that there is anxiety lurking in me somewhere. So don’t wait for “an extreme level of anxiety” before you realize that you are anxious.

We can relax into God’s righteousness every day by giving ourselves permission to be exactly human-sized, which is all that God ever expects from us.

Remember that only God is God-sized. When we pause and focus on who God is and who we are in God, we relax and start worshiping.

Discussion Questions

      1. Which of the Big 5 are you most prone to: control, perfection, knowing the answer, being there for people, or approval?
      2. Can you recall a recent time when you succumbed to one of the Big 5? What happened?
      3. What is an unreliable narration in your life that can get you into trouble?
      4. Jesus died, so I don’t have to ________ anymore. What words or phrases would you use to fill in the blank for you?
      5. Jesus died to free me from needing _______ anymore. What words or phrases would you use to fill in the blank for you?
      6. What are some signs that alert you to the times when you stopped noticing God?

Chapter 6: Addressing Chronic Anxiety

Believing takes practice. MADELEINE L’ENGLE, A WRINKLE IN TIME

…hubris often masks false needs—control, perfection, and more. And wherever false needs are being chased, chronic anxiety is sure to be lurking.

Tool: God with me; God ahead of me

Steve provides a step-by-step process to consider trying to help us cultivate an awareness of God’s presence

Prework: First identify the signs or signals that you are forgetting God’s presence. Here is Steve’s list:

      1. Worrying my way to peace
      2. Low-grade rumination – thinking hard but never resolving anything
      3. Self-pity or indignation – when I feel people have to know how bad my situation is
      4. Anger or arrogance – when I feel the need to put someone in their place
      5. The desire to escape or watch TV
      6. A tendency to exaggerate my situation

Once you notice your trigger, you can begin the following steps:

      1. Pause
      2. Remember that God is with you
      3. Remember that God is ahead of you
      4. Leave the results to God
      5. Use this tool proactively

Tool: Anxiety freedom and the Gospel

He encourages us to use the following table and look at the Big 5 and ask:

      1. What can God do?
      2. What can man do?
      3. What happens when I try to do God’s job?
The Big 5 God-sized job Human-sized Job Impact on me and others when I try to do God’s job
Control
Perfection
Knowing the Answer
Being there for People
Approval

 

Tool: Restrain and Reflect

I find that my chronic anxiety and my unreliable narrator tend to block my awareness of God in the moment, but if I can restrain my impulses long enough to reflect on them with God, I have a much better chance of seeing reality.

Steve goes on to say that after restraining and reflecting, he still may not know what to do, but he has the peace that God has got things under control. But that brings up the question: What are my recurring impulses? That is a good question to pursue.

“A keen awareness of our recurring, predictable impulses can help us learn to control them”

Also, he says that we should learn where these triggers happen. What are some of the situations where you know these impulses will be activated?

Okay, now you have found the where and the what – but we know that awareness does not alone bring about change. It is the first step towards change. We need to catch it when it happens. And then Steve proposes that you:

stop and remember that God is with me and ahead of me

But then how will you do that? Again that’s the rub.

THE NATURE OF EVERY GOSPEL

Steve tells us that there are many gospels in our world. He defines a gospel as a “path to the good life.” He says that every gospel has three things:

      1. Promise (what good will be achieved)
      2. Path (how you get there)
      3. Payment (what it will cost you)

I am not so sure it fits the good news aspect of the Gospel. It seems more than that. Let’s call it “The Carrot.” It is what we are going after. If we do this (The Path), this will happen (The Promise), and it will require this much (The Payment). The True Gospel can be thought of as “The Carrot.” But many false Carrots promise us something; there is a path to get there, and a price we will pay for obtaining that false Carrot. He tells us to pursue the following questions:

      • What false Carrots have you been pursuing in the past or even now?
      • What was the path that you went on (or are on)?
      • What did it cost you  (or still is costing you)?

One of the most powerful and liberating tools I use is paying attention to what I am believing at any given moment (my unreliable narrator) and then mapping out what the path is, what the promise is, and who is paying.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

    1. What situation is coming up this week where you might practice “God with me, God ahead of me”
    2. Do you have a situation coming up where you are carrying more than you can carry?
    3. When have you been able to “relax into the presence of God”? What was that like for you?

Chapter 7 Gap 3: My Spiritual Progress

“I Thought I’d Be Further Along by Now”

Christian maturity is not a matter of doing more for God; it is God doing more in and through us. Eugene Peterson – Practice Resurrection

The reason we think we should be further along by now is connected to how we read the Bible, how we compare ourselves to others, and then how we reinforce these dynamics in our faith communities.

Many of us spend too much spiritual energy—and, frankly, guilt—trying to be something God did not ask us to be.

Looking at how we read the Bible (Dallas Willard taught me this) we can put ourselves in the story. But so often we put ourselves as the main character. For example, in the story – Jesus walks on water- we can, as John Ortberg says–if you want to walk on water, you need to get out of the boat. We put ourselves in the impetuous, act-first-think-later, risk-taker Peter’s place, and we are a meditative, contemplative server of people.

11 were in the boat and they all worshiped Jesus at the end of this. So 1st recommendation is to be careful as we read the text this way – which character we put ourselves in.

Those of us in cultures that place a high value on performance and improvement are prone to see every story in the Bible as “something I need to work on,”

What if most of the stories in the Bible are designed to primarily evoke a worship encounter with God rather than a self-improvement task list?

There is room in you to be exactly one human, and God wants to transform you—not into a super-disciple, but into a human-sized you.

One way to summarize this section of the book is that Stephen is telling us that we are not supposed to become the sum of all the wonderful characters in the Bible: a leader like Moses; a fighter and a songwriter like David; courageous like Esther; long-suffering like Jeremiah; bold and brash like Peter; a contemplative like Mary. God wants us to be a human-sized us.

If you count every unique day captured by all the gospel writers, the total number is between fifty-two and fifty-seven. The Gospels capture less than 5 percent of Jesus’ public ministry. What did He and the disciples do the other 95% of the time.

We never see the disciples shopping or doing laundry, or frankly engaging in recreation.

The Bible concentrates on “God-soaked moments.”

Final Comparison Frontier

God’s job is to form us into Christ-like-ness, but we are prone to make it our job because we so quickly move into the seat of control.

The primary emphasis of our own spiritual growth effort is not so much becoming like another person or like God; it is dying to self

We cannot be like Jesus, because when we try, we end up creating Jesus in our image and losing sight of the true Jesus.

The fruit of the Spirit is what God forms in us after we die to ourselves.

God is more interested in us bringing our whole selves to him in worship than he is in our improvement.

God has changed me to seek him sooner when I am reactive rather than addressing my shortcomings on my own like I used to.

If we focus primarily on dying to ourselves and worshiping Jesus—seeking to encounter the true Christ—we can ease into being human-sized, relax into God’s presence, and be free to serve, sacrifice, and be stretched, challenged, and rebuked.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

      1. Are you prone to try to always be like the main character of every Bible story? What has that been like for you?
      2. Is there a person in Scripture you most relate to? What attributes do you share?
      3. How can God redeem and use those attributes for the sake of others?
      4. How would you say a person grows in Christ?
      5. How do you discern God’s will today?
      6. What aspects of following Jesus were more straightforward in Bible times, and what aspects were more difficult?
      7. What most helps you encounter the invisible God today?

Chapter 8 – Replacing Unhealthy Assumptions

Begin by making a list of things Jesus can do that you and your friends will never be able to do, no matter how hard you try. Here is the start of mine:

    1. Create the world
    2. Hold it together
    3. Indwell through His Spirit other people
    4. Completely and perfectly love – “When in your life recently have you felt most fully and completely loved?”

Steve then recommends making a Life-Giving List. The Life-Giving List is simply a list of the people, places, and activities God has given you that make you feel human, connected, and alive. Here is my list

Life-Giving List

People Remote or Local Places Distance from House Activities Cost in Time and Money
Former co-worker Remote Trapp 4.5 hours Reading 0
Pastor Local Ft Myers 26 hours Being with good friends 0
College Roomate Remote Barkhamstead back reservoir 40 minutes Baking 0
Directee Local Farmington River 5 minutes Walking 0
Simsbury Farms Golf Course 17 minutes Fixing things 0
Writing 0
Running on beach 0
Alone in God’s presence 0
Being with Barbara 0

 

Steve says:

I use the list in my daily connection with God. I also use my calendar and budget to make time for the longer and larger items on the list.

Steve has more than 160 items on his list. He uses it as a worship document.

The Life-Giving List helps me increase my threshold for worship, and, perhaps most powerfully, it massively expands my scope and palette of what worship is.

TOOL: BIBLE STUDY, PRAYER, AND QUIET TIME

Though Steve recommends these classic spiritual disciplines, he sees two problems with them.

We have narrowed the way we interact with bible study, prayer and quiet. We try to do it as it works for others.

It does take time, reflection and study to get all you can out of these three disciplines.

CULTURAL FORMATION; FLIPPED VALUES AND PAUL

You might say we are discipled by our culture and times, just as we are discipled by Jesus. Sometimes this discipleship is a competition, as when the values of the culture compete with the values of God’s kingdom. Other times, we see the values line up.

Steve attempts to make a point that many of the statements in the Bible do not translate in our culture. He then uses Paul’s statement – “To live is Christ, to die is gain.” He says it’s wrong to translate that into our life. I think he misunderstands what Paul means. Yes, Paul wanted to go and be with the Lord.  But if we take in Richard Hayes interpretation of Paul’s theology, we see that this is a universal statement – not a cultural one. In other words, we will be better off when we die, but right now we are called to live here on earth.

CULTURAL FORCES AND THE GOSPEL

How do we live faithfully for Jesus while being formed and forged by our unique times? The answer is not feeling guilty that we feel differently than Paul, and it is not trying to be more like him.

I have found it most helpful to become aware of the forces at work that drive and compel me, the unique challenges of discipleship in my own time and place

These conversations are complex and best done in community.

I live in the United States. Four core values where I live are freedom, personal rights, safety, and wealth-building for security

Jesus is much less concerned with my personal safety than I am.

Steve sees some cultural forces that line up with the gospel:

      1. Generosity
      2. Valuing the success / encouraging the success of others

He then gives more questions to ponder:

      1. What values do you think oppose the gospel?
      2. What values do you think line up with the gospel?
      3. What can you do this month that helps you swim against the cultural norms that oppose the gospel?

“You have heard it said…”

Steve tells us that we think that progress in the faith is about learning – but a lot of it is about unlearning.

Look at the gospels and discover how much of Jesus’ discipling is unlearning.

Chapter 9 Home and Shalom

We come to God by love, not by navigation. St. Augustine

SHALOM AND SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS

Home is anywhere we are fully welcomed and accepted, free to love and be loved. Our guard is down; we do not need to strive; we do not need to be anything more than we are; and we are well. We are well with God; well with ourselves; well with other people.

We are rejuvenated, breathing easy, and thriving. But we are not just receiving. Our hearts are opened up to freely give to others. Home is not necessarily comfort, nor is it safe, but it is always belonging, always encountering love.  Home is where we experience God’s profound and specific love for us. We are able to relax into it and then generously pour it out to others, including marginalized people and enemies. Going home is what allows us to risk, explore, and sacrifice for the needs of others.

If this is home, then the Hebrew Scriptures word for it is shalom. The word shalom makes most of us think of a greeting or “peace.” That is a fine start, but shalom goes much deeper than our modern understanding of peace. It has more to do with human flourishing than simply a peaceful existence. When we translate words from one culture to another, they can lose some horsepower.

Shalom means “thriving,” “wholeness,” “ well-being.” Shalom is not measured simply through individual wellness; the wellness of an entire community is in view here.  True shalom involves every relationship in a society—with ourselves, God, our people, strangers, the under-resourced, enemies, immigrants, creation, all of it. All people are well, not just the well-off and well-to-do.

How do we know when we are well? One of the simplest ways is to learn what it feels like to be connected.

Peace is not the absence of things we don’t like, but the sensed presence of the Prince of Peace.

Learning to practice home and shalom in his chaplaincy amid pain and suffering, Cuss learned that we can experience home and shalom anywhere.

The call to repent in the scriptures is an invitation to shalom.

God sees sin as more of a breach than a list.

Most of us think that God punishes us when we sin. But more accurately, sin punishes us when we fall short.

Herbert McCabe suggested that the reason to avoid sin is that it pollutes our thinking. Sin makes us think that God has changed His view of us

McCabe proposed that sin doesn’t change God’s view of us; sin changes our view of God’s view of us.

In his book Orthodoxy, G. K. Chesterton claims that sin ages us.

Chesterton says God must be playful like a child because a child never tires of repetition. … Chesterton provokes our thinking, suggesting that God is better at being a kid than we are. Chesterton writes, “We have sinned and grown old, and our Father is younger than we.”

What does it mean to become like a child – never tire of repetition – me

I have heard the exact opposite teaching to this teaching from Bernard of Clairvaux, “Sermon 18, ‘The Two Operations of the Holy Spirit,’:

The man who is wise, therefore, will see his life as more like a reservoir than a canal. The canal simultaneously pours out what it receives;the reservoir retains the water till it is filled, then discharges the overflow without loss to itself. . . . You too must learn to await this fullness before pouring out your gifts, do not try to be more generous than God.

That doesn’t take away the truth, but we are to be reservoirs in some ways and canals or rivers in other ways.

Discussion Questions

    1. Where is home for you?
    2. What “home” work might you try this week to experience home?
    3. When you think of the word sin, what primarily comes to mind?
    4. What do you think of Herbert McCabe’s notion that “sin distorts our view of God’s view of us?”
    5. When do you feel most fully and completely loved? 6What life-giving habits will you cultivate ib the next 30 days?
    6. What might it look like to try to be “more generous than God”? What might you do this week to serve out of the overflow rather than pour everything out?

Gauntlet Questions (Terrible party ice-breakers)

When I trained as a spiritual director, I accumulated a 20 page document with the best questions to ask during spiritual direction. These are Steve’s best questions to get to know someone. Most of these are excellent. I will add them to my list:

    1. How do you know when you are not well?
    2. What practice—that takes five minutes or less—helps you connect with God?
    3. What sort of leadership situations generate anxiety for you?
    4. What type of people trigger you the most
    5. What do you do to stay connected to them?
    6. Sometimes we can be the last to know when we’re not okay. Who in your life knows before you know?
    7. When you think about your family of origin, what is one asset and one liability that you’ve inherited from them?
    8. In the absence of information, people connect the dots in the most pathological way possible. What goes through your mind when you’re anxious but don’t have all the information?
    9. In your leadership, where do you keep running into yourself? What trait do you wish you could break?
    10. Criticism is tough. What type of criticism most affects you?
    11. Cumulative criticism can take you out. Tell us about a season that felt like unrelenting criticism.
    12. What if I were at least as _______ to myself as God is?
    13. Where do you experience a gap between what you believe and what you experience?
    14. How do you mind that gap?
    15. If you treated yourself as well as you treated others, what one way of dealing with yourself would you change?
    16. Can you share a time you witnessed a miracle? What happened?
    17. What have you found helpful to do in order to deal with loneliness?
    18. When recently have you felt free?
    19. Tell us about a time in the last few weeks when you were at peace.
    20. What have you found helpful to do in order to deal with loneliness?
    21. When recently have you felt free?
    22. Tell us about a time in the last few weeks when you were at peace

[1] Acedia is a state of spiritual apathy

Book Summary: Love Poems for My Wife by George Hobson

I met George and Vi in 1973. They were teaching on marriage during a Wednesday night service. I had walked with Jesus for about 2 years, but despite my youth, I was duly impressed. As you will see from some of the quotes, Vi has suffered from memory loss for a long time.

My wife was stricken with a rare disease (Capgras) in 2020. In this disease, the wife (or husband) doesn’t recognize their spouse – and only their spouse. It is sometimes called Spousal Replacement Syndrome. I discovered a journal article that proposed a possible reason the wife has a problem recognizing only the husband. Facial recognition in the case of a loved one is augmented with an emotional reaction that can be measured by the skin temperature. You “get a charge” out of seeing your loved one. Some with Capgras do not exhibit that temperature rise when shown a picture of their loved one. This told the researchers that the emotional connections in the brain had broken down (my wife also has white matter disease – which is the connecting matter in the brain).

I decided I would do everything in my power to re-map her brain’s emotional network. One of the ways I did this was with George’s poems. I would leave excerpts from his beautiful words around the house and on mirrors. After a year of this and other things, my dear one no longer exhibited Capgras. Since recovery is very rare, I attribute it to the new neural connections we made in part thanks to George’s poetry. I am forever grateful to God and to George for that.

It not only allowed me to be me again with her – it did wonders for our relationship. After 50 years, we are more in love than ever. BUY the BOOK and read some of the words to your spouse.

I hope you enjoy these excerpts:

My wife and I met online in 1973. How is that possible? Over a telephone line. This poem made me realize that God spoke to me: “This is she” at that moment.

Love settled on the smile across the room
And said: This is she. You shall cherish her
All your years: her radiance today,
Her beauty in the middle passage, her loveliness
In age. She is yours to keep and hold.
Her smile is like a leaf in morning sun,
Her laughter like water burbling over stones;
Her heart is glass, transparent; her will
A compass, fixed to do the bidding of her Lord.
Cherish her, she is woman, she is yours.
You must endure the strain of time.
Each trial Will be occasion for your love to grow.
This woman is my gift, says God.
Take her as wife. In her beauty lies the mirror of eternal life.

I really can identify with this fragment:

In her beauty lies the mirror of eternal life.

My wife has beautiful blue eyes. The eye doctor confirmed it yesterday. According to him, only Paul Neuman’s exceed them in their beauty. And yet, it was two years into our marriage before I recognized them.

How is it I scarcely saw you
All those years ago?
What cataracts filmed my eyes

Every morning when she awakes, the first thing I wait for is that smile that “sets my day apart.”

How could my whole soul and body fail to exult
At the kindness in your hazelnut eyes
And the smile playing on your face,
Warm, mischievous and gentle,

Yes! True passion is nourished through slow growth:

How vain from our years’ hilltop
To regret my failure to know you
With my whole soul and body
When we were still young.
What counts is our faithfulness
And the slow growth of love:
So is true passion nourished.

Yes! To have the strength of youth with the depth of our age:

How I would our youth were ours again—
Ours in our age!
For our passion is richer now than then,
Our intimacy truer.

My love for Barbara seems so shallow now when I look back at it, but this snippet describes it now:

Our roots have gone deeper
Into love’s loamy soil.

I love the image of our marriage going from a house to an inn. Not a home as just a cozy nest, but a welcoming presence:

Picture of my old soul
As it was when we met,
Before you and my Lord
Assaulted and captured my stronghold,
Set up house within its walls,
Refurbished it slowly,
And made it an inn.
Oh, yes, I give thanks!

I shall sing thanks to heaven,
And to you speak it sweetly—
Any veil left between us
By grace of God, you’ve held, do hold me fast—
You, my love, have brought me into your glad home at last.

Barbara is the only one whom I ever heard God say to (and it was really Him): “You are good, my daughter.” And that goodness is setting me free.

And as we age, your presence, like perfume,
Makes my life sweet, your goodness sets me free

There is a part of married love that is all-pervasive:

Love, you’re all about me.
Everywhere I see your hand and eye.
Your strong heart beats
In every corner of the empty house; your care
Covers every object my dull gaze meets.

I experience beauty so much more powerfully when I have shared it with Barbara:

Beauty unshared holds no intrinsic thrill.
The world is love’s work, God’s work:

I know more of what George is talking about here since Barbara’s illness:

In this silence we commune.
Now we say more
Than words speak.
Yet we need words to draw out
All the love our hearts contain.
But you and I are called to peace.
We vow Love in the silence of our hearts.

Even now, this is true. Always fragile before. Now more so. But Oh what strength! And I love the way Barbara laughs at my jokes:

You are fragility itself.
Yet what strength!
What womanhood!
The sun in your hair,
A wave of light!
Your smile is very joy putting out its sign:
“Laughter is what we do here: welcome!”

Eyes of Love

When I behold you with the eyes of love,
I see God’s radiance in your lovely face.
In your eyes shines pure light from high above
Our realm, where earth’s cloistered pastures give place
To open range, everlasting, boundless.
Of that realm, in your eyes’ depths, I see the gleam,
Like a spark echoing the fire in the furnace
Of a distant star, as in a vivid dream
One might experience the wild glory
Of divinity unleashed. That gleam tells
Of your great Maker, speaks the story
Of His profligate love drawn from the wells
Of His primordial Life. In your lovely face
God’s love is mirrored, figuring His grace.

The Smile

At her mouth’s edge a smile dawns.
Like sunlight through broken
Clouds gliding on a grassy hill,
It moves across her lips silently,
Even as her mind’s motions
Recall a joke, a jest, a shared intimacy,
And pull up into light
A forgotten thread from our love.
Her lips part,
Sun floods the hill,
The smile breaks over her face like a wave—
She laughs.
Her eyes flash like pools on the hillside,
Her heart erupts—
And for a moment there is no time,
Time has gone over the hill,
It has vanished.
There is only now,
Eternity.
Joy

But how shall I, poor aging soul,
Show love befitting her
To my sweet mate
(For love, to be true,
Must fit the object loved
And be not just the subject’s wish)?
How shall I,
Who so fear loss,
Resist my fear of what must someday come?
“By loving,” says my Lord.
“One loves today,
Not yesterday, not the day to come.
Love is in the things you see
And in your gestures,
Your gentle gestures.

Has My Sun Set?

Oh, I’ve uttered fervent prayers, my God!
I’ve shot them like pellets, blown them like bubbles,
Shaken them at you as I might shake a rod.
Day and night, Lord, I’ve poured out all my troubles.
Anguished, I’ve cried to you for my beloved wife:
God, breathe on the still-hot embers of her mind!
Rekindle in those coals the fire of life!
Bring mental light again where she’s gone blind!
You’ve heard me, Lord, I know that.
Your ears Have not been closed, nor your heart.
Yet, No answer comes.
Despite my faith, fears
Claw at me. I grow cold.
Has my sun set?
For my dear wife is like the sun to me.
Have mercy, Lord—set Victoria free!

Book Summary Surprised by Oxford

Surprised by Oxford by Carol Weber

This summary will be a little different in that I don’t want to repeat the story but rather the wisdom of Carol and others found in the book. I found this book amazing. Barbara and I read it together – and she even enjoyed it! It is the memoir of a brilliant young student who won a scholarship to Oxford. She was raised with very little faith input and it traces her journey to Jesus. I love her insights. She says in the beginning that she attempted to faithfully reproduce these conversations. One reviewer claimed – “No one talks like this.” He has never been to Oxford.

Since this doesn’t summarize a great story, I highly recommend that you read the book.

Carol’s bits of wisdom:

Talking about how much she liked U2’s music as a non-Christian.

On one level they suggested eros or the self-giving love of God. The former beckons the latter, and yet the latter does not need any predilection. Indeed, all other forms of love will be healed and function most beautifully when subsumed under agape’s rule.

However, the intertwining of sex and spirituality has always haunted literature and art, perhaps because we crave the intimate and are most immediately assuaged by the sexual, and so we know of no other appropriate language.

Pursuing one’s degree at Oxford becomes for most not a matter of a prerequisite for a job, or to please one’s parents, or to make a minimum income bracket. Rather, the opportunity to study here seals an experience marked by intense personal growth resulting from a genuine desire to learn. A heady, hearty experience that changes you forever because it cracks you open ultimately to the humility of learning.

One of her professors once remarked:
An education forced is no education at all.

Carol’s response: “I thought about how it seemed anything forced made it nothing at all.”

I now understand why conversion and conversation are evocative of each other, turning toward each other, yet separated merely by where you are “at.”

The morning after I heard the gospel, I woke up with what felt like a hangover. Little would I know it was of the spiritual kind that accompanies the inevitable dawn of realization that life is not, perhaps, what we previously thought it was.

One day at the tiny gym I visited on High Street, after a string of hits from Bon Jovi, I heard a Scottish pastor on the radio claim, like TDH, that Scripture has real, explosive power. Not the power of suggestion, reprimand, or even persuasion. Not nice pleasantries or comforting self-help tips. But the power of spiritual DYNAMITE! It blows your worldview apart, shatters your complacency, forces you to choose, to act, to love. It is radical and holy . . . without amendment . . . without apology.

When encouraged to commit her life to Jesus by one of her professors:
“No one will understand,” I bemoaned when she returned.
“Some will,” she replied.
“No one will listen; no one will really hear,” I continued.
“Some will, eventually, or perhaps.” She shrugged. “Beyond speaking the truth in love, that’s not your territory anyway.”
“I will no longer belong,” I said sadly.
“To whom?” Her beautiful eyes danced.

I love the way she describes the movement of the Holy Spirit in her – even before she was a follower. After her brother made a snide remark about her becoming a Christian:

I felt the sting. Then the indignant defense rushed in. Then the anger. Then the sadness. And, then, without warning, the Love. Within an instant. That tsunami Love, which threatened to flood out everything.

I found her observation on the fall fresh and insightful:

No wonder Eve’s temptation was intellectual—not sexual, or sensual, or physical, or even, ironically, spiritual, but highly intelligent—a rationalization of her desire, her hubris. Our heads can deceive us just as much as our hearts, if not more so.

I never connected homesickness to the Trinity:

Homesickness only makes the afflicted more in tune with how absolutely plausible a concept like the Trinity really is.

She offered an interesting reason why a non-Christian might not want to be prayed for:

I did not want anyone to know my want. If they knew my want, they might not want to know me

And these tidbits:

Life offers so many excuses for shame.

We can lean into the human fear, acknowledge it, and move through it to the larger vision, or we can remain crumpled by it, crumble to it.
But then I remembered that remembering is the antidote to despair.

Yes, I see. Joy is the Christian’s secret weapon. No one else has it in such abundance.

Often the darkest things within ourselves become the keys by which we open ourselves to God, to His healing, and to a better comprehension of grace (full comprehension, I think, is beyond us at present).

Wisdom from others

I love the way she starts running into Christians everywhere – her professors, the dean, on an airplane, in her dorm. She had never noticed them before. I think it is like that. You never notice positive Christians until you are on your way.

“The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.” Yeats

She records this from a special dinner with distinguished guests from around the world:

A scholarship student, I was invited to Christmas dinner at “high table” at my Oxford college—an extravagant and beautiful dining experience—to which I brought along my new Christian friend “TDH” (otherwise known as Tall, Dark and Handsome). As a result, I was memorably impacted by a conversation about science and faith in general, and by the modeling of a faithful life in particular. I consider this scene quintessentially Oxford in its setting and challenge, and I hope it offers a window into the magical and moving experience of my conversion path as a student there.
The guest of honor was a brilliant scientist whose expertise lay in the intersection of time, space, speed, sound and light. He once cracked a notoriously complicated algorithm, which won him much fame.

The following excerpt is, according to Carol, a faithful representation of what went on at this dinner from Chapter 10 “Does Love Justify All?” of the book. I was particularly struck by the argument for God from the equilibrium that exists in the universe. Not that it was particularly persuasive but that it was new to me.

More persuasive was the famous surgeon’s recognition that death is wrong. I know some theistic evolutionists who feel that death is beautiful – but of course it must be for theistic evolution to work. But the surgeon’s observation parallels mine. I once was with a beautiful race horse while it died. One minute, even though in agony, it was beautiful. The moment it died, it was ugly.

“I’ve been enjoying this lively conversation, this God-and-science dilemma; such a treat for a reclusive researcher like me,” he winked. The table now turned on him, expectant. He paused, as though measuring his words carefully. Then he began.
“Well, I wonder if it’s much like the secret of the magnet, Miss Drake.”
“Everything I’ve witnessed in the natural world seems to operate in a desire to attain equilibrium. What rises, falls. What heats, cools. What freezes, thaws. The magnet attracts and repels the thing most like it, another magnet. Yet without this force, nothing in the world would function. We are the only planet in this solar system with such delicate conditions for life. The axes of the poles would cease to spin, the tides would halt, the sun would fail to rise and set, if these forces did not exist in a relationship of attraction and repulsion, a relationship which seeks this equilibrium that allows for life,” Dr. Sterling explained.
“Are you saying that these things exist in perfect relationship?” the provost asked.
“That’s a difficult one to answer, as things currently stand. Perfect enough, yes, to perpetuate life on the planet. But imperfect enough to contribute, at times, to our suffering, wouldn’t you say?”
“What of life and death?” Dr. Rieland queried.
“Precisely,” replied Dr. Sterling
“You mention what rises, falls; what heats, cools. But what of what lives? It dies, as all must die, Dr. Sterling. Then what of this equilibrium? This great magnet?” Dr. Rieland persisted.
“Yes, true, that’s where there is a momentary crack in the equilibrium,” Dr. Sterling conceded. “Remember, though, I didn’t say it was perfect in its current state, did I? Just perfect enough, for the moment, which seems pretty generous to me.”
“We barely scratch the surface of time!” Dr. Sterling exclaimed. “A fissure is only as broad as you perceive it to be. It may be miniscule from one perspective—barely perceptible—yet from another, it may seem massive, even overwhelmingly uncrossable, like a black hole in space. Is it a mountaintop or an abyss? It might depend on how you are seeing. For instance, from which angle you are looking or with which eyes.” “What lives, continues to live, forever, if the perfect equilibrium is restored, if the relationship is repaired between the two ends of the magnet, or the two sides of the chasm, so to speak.”
“Oh my! What has this got to do with God and science?” asked the politician’s wife with a little laugh.
“Everything,” Dr. Sterling cried most seriously. “Everything!””
“Let’s be frank, shall we?”
“The more I discovered of the scientific world, the more it convinced me of the amazing interconnectedness and brilliancy of God’s design. People tend to think of science as being at odds with faith, but nothing could be further from the truth. The one only confirms the other; the one only illuminates its echo, and yet its limitations and dependence in the face of the other.”
“While they are connected, there is a difference between fear and awe. We shouldn’t be afraid to embrace the awe. All of my work has only proven to me that the imprint of the Divine lies on the natural world. So why wouldn’t the same be the case for science?”
He then turned to Dr. Inchbald. “How do you reconcile God and science.”
“I admit,” he said softly, so softly we all had to crane to hear, and so we all moved in closer, a disparate bunch of similarly expectant faces. “I admit that I don’t know what to think about God, about death when I see it happen. When I have to inform a patient’s family that he didn’t pull through, or that no matter what we can try to do, it won’t be enough to save him.” He grew very quiet. “The hardest ones, for me, I think, are the children.”
“Sometimes I want to rage against God when I see the lifeless body of a teenage boy who was running a court and shooting baskets only a short while ago. Or when I operate on a tiny new baby with a hole in its heart. Or when I see the blue lips of a grandmother who was only just kissing her grandbabies that morning.” He paused, and then smiled wryly. “One of my specialties is massive coronaries, a funny kind of ‘specialty’ to have in life, when you think about it.”
He continued, “You had better think through God if you’re going to stay in one piece. I’ve had colleagues try to sidestep God, but that only cracks them apart even further in the long run.”
Dr. Inchbald continued, “I’ve seen science and medicine do much good, and I’ve seen it have no effect, despite the most valiant efforts. These lines on my old face are hard-won, and I’m now slowly growing proud of them,” he chuckled. Then his voice grew even stronger. “After many years, and I admit after many stiff drinks after many hard days, one morning I stood suspended over one heart, scalpel in hand, about to cut in. It was a bit of a Monty Python moment, as I’ve liked to come to call it.”
“Well, as I was standing there, all the uncertainty of my life, the absurdity of all this death, and all our attempts to ward it off, came down to a pinprick of light—like the glint off the scalpel in my hand. As I looked down I realized my hand was shaking, the ultimate downfall for any surgeon, but especially a heart surgeon.
“I panicked and felt as if I was being swallowed up in, well,” he looked over at Dr. Sterling, “a black hole.”
“When all of a sudden, I heard it. A ping.”
“A ping. Like a, well, high-pitched ping. Like the sound that the machine that cost over a million pounds makes in the delivery room in the opening birth sequence to Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life. You’re British, you should know,” he leveled at the provost. “The machine that goes ping!”
Dr. Inchbald continued, “This ping marked something that finally went off in my head, in my heart, in my hand—steadying all three by what I can only call a miracle.”
“I’ve come to the conclusion that God is sovereign, even over science, and that I cannot pretend to fully know His ways. They really are mysterious, as the saying goes. They are not of the mind of men, no matter how hard we try to wrap our minds about these ways. I can marvel at the intricacies of the human body, which really are pretty miraculous to behold. In fact, I don’t know how one can go to medical school and not be in greater awe of a Creator than ever before. The original, in both senses of the term, pings into the banal; the heavenly pokes in, pokes through.”
“To cut to the chase when I see death, I know it is wrong.”
“Really, really wrong. In my gut wrong,” Dr. Inchbald almost pleaded. “It was not meant to be. It was not meant for us. We were not built for it. Everything in my body, at a cellular level, let alone a metaphysical one, twists against it. Not just my death, but the death of every living thing.”
Dr. Sterling interjected into all of our ruminating thoughts. “Yes, I would have to conclude that no matter how misleading the title of the theory of relativity, absolutes rule the physical as well as the metaphysical. For me, God’s love is so great that it can attract even the farthest, most lost, most seemingly random cell to Him. That we desire to respond, to have right relationship with Him, is the secret. To set it all right. For everything to be all right.”
As they were leaving another conversation ensued:
“Sir,” the waiter knelt down beside him, “I wondered if you could tell me what you consider to be the strongest force in the universe?” He rushed on, “Please forgive my intruding, but I was curious as to your opinion, your being such a great scientist and all.”
Dr. Sterling put his hand on the waiter’s shoulder. “Excellent question!” he marveled.
“I’m a bit of a science-fiction buff,” the waiter admitted, “and I read all the science magazines. Always have. Before I had to quit school, science was my best subject,” he added proudly.
Dr. Sterling nodded in praise. “Well, what a delight and an honor to meet a fellow with similar interests. Yes, I don’t think I’ve ever been asked such an excellent question.”
The waiter beamed.
“Love.”
The waiter’s smile froze, and then it started to melt. He gave Dr. Sterling a confused look.
“The answer to your query is Love,” Dr. Sterling repeated.
“I’m afraid I don’t understand,” the waiter hedged. “I mean, love is an abstract, an emotion. It’s not a force or a substance or even a theory.”
“Are you so sure?” Dr. Sterling’s eyes danced.
We were waiting for the rest of the procession to go through the dining hall doors, so the waiter risked a few more moments of conversation. He leaned in even closer to Dr. Sterling, resting his arm intimately on his wheelchair. Dr. Rieland threw the waiter a withering look, but Dr. Sterling seemed delighted.
“Please, sir, do go on,” the waiter urged, ardently, seeing only the doctor’s delight, and delighted in response.
“Well, I used to have this hunch,” Dr. Sterling began, “but years of experience have only confirmed it.”
“What?” the waiter asked with bated breath. Now several of us were listening intently, but Dr. Sterling continued to speak only with the waiter.
“There is nothing more powerful, more radical, more transformational than Love. No other source or substance or force. Do not be deceived, for it is all of these things, and then some! Often folks like to dismiss it as a mere emotion, but it is far more than that. It can’t be circumscribed by our desires or dictated by the whim of our moods. Not the Great Love of the Universe, as I like to call it. Not the Love that set everything in motion, keeps it in motion, which moves through all things and yet bulldozes nothing, not even our will. Try it. Just try it and you’ll see. If you love that Great Love first, because It loved you first, and then love yourself as you have been loved, and then love others from that love…Wow! Bam! Life without that kind of faith—that’s death. Therein lies the great metaphor, Miss Drake,” he nodded toward me. “Life without faith is death. For life, as it was intended to be, is Love. Start loving and you’ll really start living. There is no other force in the universe comparable to that.”

I love this letter from Flannery O’Connor

Dear Mr. Corn,

I certainly don’t think that the death required that “ye be born again,” is the death of reason . . . Satisfy your demand for reason always, but remember that charity is beyond reason, and that God can be known through charity.

Regards
Flannery

She had many Christians in her dorm and in her classes who showed great wisdom:

“Sometimes I think the good news is almost easier to share with strangers,” Rachel observed, “maybe because so much isn’t on the line, relatively speaking (if you pardon the pun).”
“It’s the most important thing to share,” Mark insisted. “Of anyone we should be sharing it with—”
“But therein lies the rub,” Dorian interjected.

Of course there was a C.S. Lewis Society on campus. Here is what one of the speakers said:

“The gravity of being a Christian must be matched, if not outweighed, by the levity of being one. You cannot truly live the gospel and be a serious hypocrite.”

Quoting Rainer Maria Rilke

You are so young, so before all beginning, and I want to beg you, as much as I can, to be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves—like locked rooms and like books that are written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. The point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.

“Perhaps everything terrible is in its deepest being something helpless that wants help from us.”

Bodleian Library at Oxford

From one of her professors:

Fear lies at the unexamined core of who we are. Faith grows from the surpassing of fear in spite of its presence.

when you work from faith, either you will step forward onto something solid, or you will be given wings

People assume that our dignity only lies in our choices, in what we think we so powerfully will and wield. But it can reside in our reactions, too, in our decisions about how to respond.

A friend telling Carol about the beauty of a good Christian fellowship:

To put it simply, I guess, it’s because I found that the people here, for the most part, take the gospel seriously without taking themselves too seriously.”

Her sister when telling Carol why she is holding back from God:

I’m afraid of what I will discover. About Him. About me

“Pray to God, but keep rowing to shore.” Old Russian Proverb

Another friend:

The really amazing thing about grace is that it takes you even beyond the top rung.

Antoine de Saint-Exupery:

Here is my secret. It is very simple: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.1

The Breakup

Chapter 13 which records where she breaks up with her boyfriend is worth the price of the book alone. After telling him that being married with separate world views would be a disaster:

“I’m not so sure, Carolyn,” Ben reasoned. “I mean, can’t you do your thing, and I can do mine? My parents do it all the time, and they’ve been together forever.”
“I don’t want to live in a separate part of the house from you, Ben, let alone in a separate part of my soul from you . . .” I struggled to explain, but I didn’t have the vocabulary yet.
“I’ve tried to believe, Carolyn, honest I have. Especially when I thought that not doing so meant losing you.” Ben spoke so ardently that I ached. For him. For us.
I moved in closer to him, wrapping my quilt around him too. “But I just can’t,” he whispered. I took his hand and looked at his face, part shadow, part flame. “Come with me,” I pleaded.
Remember – she wasn’t there yet. She was on a journey exploring Jesus. But had not been born again.
He looked at me, and then he looked away into the flames.
I held my breath and waited.
“No.” He shook his head, still avoiding my gaze.
“No.”
I exhaled.
It was over.

I love this poem that Ben left her when they broke up:

I don’t know any other way of loving
but this, in which there is no I or you,
so intimate that your hand upon my chest is my hand,
so intimate that when I fall asleep it is your eyes
that close.

 

Book Summary: The Healing Light by Agnes Sanford

The Healing Light by Agnes Sanford

Barbara and I chose to re-read this classic book on healing. I read it over 40 years ago and thought it a bit strange. But when I heard that my mentor Dallas Willard had very high respect for her and in his last days, kept this book and the Bible at his bedside table, I knew it was time to revisit.  I still think she has some odd ideas – but I haven’t been involved in praying for people like she had so I wanted to give her a second chance.

Her terminology often raises red flags but I think that her power to be an instrument of  healing in so many people’s lives stems from a Christ-centered life. Would that we all could pray and see as many people healed as she has. I would encourage you to read it with an open mind and glean what value you can from the book.

Introduction

The book opens with an introduction that I quote extensively:

“The scientific attitude is the attitude of perfect open-mindedness,” writes Agnes Sanford. “It consists in an unshakable faith in the laws of nature combined with perfect humility toward those laws and a patient determination to learn them at all cost. Through this humility scientists have learned how to conform to the laws of nature and by so doing have achieved results. Through the same meekness those who seek God can produce results by learning to conform to His laws of faith and love.

“The first step in seeking to produce results by any power is to contact that power…

“The second step is to turn it on…

“The third step is to believe that this power is coming into use and to accept it by faith. No matter how much we ask for something it becomes ours only as we accept it and give thanks for it.”

Glenn Clark, who wrote the introduction, says that there is something besides following these steps and that is “a climate of faith.” He goes on to say that the book isn’t just about healing. It is a guide to redemptive, creative living. (NOTE: Glenn was the founder of Camp Farthest Out – A Global Outreach of Creative Christian Living). We have taught extensively to our prayer teams about creating a climate of faith when praying for others.

Chapter I God Works Through Us

Agnes starts with an analogy about healing prayer. If you have an electric iron,Iron it does no good to speak to the iron and say “Iron this shirt.” You first have to plug it in. She says that it is the same as connecting to the healing power of God. We cannot just speak to an illness and see it change. We need to speak to it out of our connection with God. This is reminiscent of Luke’s (the physician) words when he makes the enigmatic statements: “And the power of the Lord was with him to heal.” (Luke 5:17) and “all the crowd sought to touch him, for power came out from him and healed them all.” (Luke 6:19). Why these statements? Isn’t the power of the Lord with Jesus to heal at all times? Yes, because He was connected to the source. And is this power to heal something that flows like electricity? Luke seems to think so. So, even though her terms are a bit strange, there is some Scriptural basis for this terminology. Her central point in these opening chapters is that this healing power is none other than God Himself.[1]

Later in this first chapter she talks about how joy “is the heavenly ‘OK’ on the inner life of power.” In other words, when we experience joy in trial, it is God’s wink to us that all is well. You cannot fake it. In her example of the healing of her baby, it was the joy of the minister who prayed that turned on the light for her.  The baby was healed because:

The life of God flowed through him [ the minister ], and could therefore be turned on by him for the healing of a child. He knew it, and therefore had the courage to speak with authority.

We have often taught others about the prayer of command. She taught me something I missed all these years. Amen – meaning “so be it” is a prayer of command. When we say amen, we are saying a prayer of command.

Going back to her electricity example, she says that for electricity to work its magic in a house, the house needs to be prepared for it. So with us, for the power of God to work through us, we need to be prepared for it.

“The Kingdom of God is within you,” said Jesus. And it is the Indwelling Light, the secret Place of the Consciousness of the Most High that is the Kingdom of Heaven in its present manifestation on the earth.  … Learning to live in the Kingdom of Heaven is learning to turn on the light of God within.

Few of us in the north would ask God to produce a full-blown rose out of doors in January. Yet He can do this very thing, if we adapt our greenhouses to His laws of heat and light, to provide the necessities of the rose.  And He can produce a full-blown answer to prayer if we adapt our earthly tabernacles to His laws of love and faith to provide the necessities of answered prayer.

I am not so sure about this next statement (the first of many!):

Some day we will understand the scientific principles that underlie the miracle-working powers of God, and we will accept His intervention as simply and naturally as we do the radio.

This implies that the miracles are based on scientific principles not yet discovered. I could say that: “Some day we will understand God’s laws [the deep magic using Lewis’ terminology] that underlie the miracle working powers of God…” The next statement shows that this is what she meant.

If one thinks of a miracle not as the breaking of God’s laws but as His own using of His laws, then the world is full of miracles.

The difficulty I have then is whether we will know on this earth these laws.

God does nothing except by law. But He has provided enough power within His laws to do anything that is in accordance with His will. His will includes unlimited miracles. It is for us to learn His will, and to seek the simplicity and the beauty of the laws that set free His power.

There is a lot to unpack in this – but suffice it to say that we are to always be praying in accordance with the will of God, which will be in keeping with His laws.

Chapter II – The Scientific Attitude: Choosing A Healing Prayer Objective

I have often embarked on prayer projects. I have never heard anyone else describe them as such. Agnes invites us into such prayer projects:

One decides upon a definite subject for prayer, prays about it and then decides whether or not the prayer-project succeeds. If it does not succeed, one seeks a better adjustment with God and tries again.

I have used this approach for years and have learned so much about God and prayer for which I am eternally grateful. Little did I know that I probably learned it from Agnes years before. She attempts to describe the scientific method and then applies it to prayer. She believes (and don’t we wish that all scientists applied this) that humility in the face of the data is essential for the success of the scientist. They must go where those “stubborn facts” and data point independent of preconceived ideas. And she then turns it to us:

Through the same meekness those who seek God can produce results by learning to conform to His laws of faith and love.

The first step in seeking to produce results by any power is to contact that power. The first step then in seeking help from God is to contact God. …So the first step is to relax and to remind ourselves that there is a source of life outside of ourselves.

The second step is to turn it on, by some such prayer as this “Heavenly Father, please increase in me at this time Your life-giving power.”

The third step is to believe that this power is coming into use and to accept it by faith. No matter how much we ask for something it becomes ours only as we accept it and give thanks for it.

And the fourth step is to observe the operations of that light and life. In order to do so, we must decide on some tangible thing that we wish accomplished by that power, so that we can know without questions whether our experiment succeeded or failed.

Let us understand then that if our experiment fails it is not due to a lack in God, but to a natural and understandable lack in ourselves.

We need to be careful with this last statement. We may think as a result of this that healing thus depends on us getting the right approach and the right words and action. Sometimes Agnes comes across that way. Later, you will hear another reason that healings do not happen, and having the wrong process is not one of them. That is why I don’t think that is what Agnes is saying. My approach has been at this stage in the project to ask God what went wrong – recognizing that my approach may be wrong or it may not be God’s time to heal yet. This is the first hint at where Agnes and I differ. She believed (I think) that all will be healed if we can get “it” right. More on this later in the book

One way the experiment can fail is that: “We might be mistaken concerning our need of these things” that we are asking for. Again, my approach is then to bring the very prayer itself before the Father and see if this is really something that needs to happen.

I love her next suggestion in our project: Start simple.

Let us choose one of the very simplest of prayer-experiments, remembering always that it must be tangible; that is, it must be something that we can put the finger on and say either “This has been done.” Or “This hasn’t been done.” … Let us not be afraid, then, to choose for our first prayer-experiment an objective that is simple and personal.

This objective must of course be in accordance with God’s will, for it is as difficult to make God’s power operate contrary to His will. …a wise seeker after God had better study the laws of God and adapt his prayers to those laws.

Agnes then surprises us with her suggestion for a simple prayer project. For me, it would be something like: “Safe travel to the store.” Simple. Measurable. But for her:

The simplest and most direct of all prayer-projects is the healing of the body.

In tracing her reasons for this, she sheds some more light on her understanding of God’s will in the matter of healing. She believed that because the Father delights in giving us good gifts and therefore since the gift of health is good, the Father always delights in granting healing. She goes on:

But those parents and teachers who dimmed the shining of His eternal Glory in our infant minds taught us that God often willed us to suffer. “Well, God’s will be done,” they sighed, when prayer for health brought no relief from pain.

It is a giant leap of logic to say that because we are not healed and therefore suffer, that God wills us to suffer. It is far more complex than that – but again – hold on. More later.

We see that the lack of success in healing is not due to God’s will for us but to our failure to live near enough to God so that He can accomplish His will in us.

Deciding once for all, then, that God is a loving Father who delights to give good gifts to His children, let us learn how to accept those gifts. Let us choose as a prayer-objective the healing of the body, because it is the most simple and the most obvious prayer-objectives.

Here she plays some of her cards on the table. We don’t succeed in prayer because of “our failure to live near enough to God. I am not convinced that anyone is always close enough to God to accomplish the healing of everyone we pray for.” This is an easy out when someone isn’t healed. “At this time in my life, I am just not close enough to God for them to be healed.”

One of the questions I am often asked about prayer for healing is whether or not we need to pray multiple times for healing. Healing from a cold according Agnes, may only take a few minutes. But:

If we have sought Him for the rebuilding of bones or nerves or sinuses, the complete healing may take time and patience. In which case, while we seek daily to reconnect our spirit with the Spirit of God in prayer, we need not repeat any request for healing that we have said. … That does not mean that we should pray only once for the matter. Most of us need every day to enter into God’s presence and focus our attention first upon Him and then upon the area that needs healing, so that God may have every opportunity of continuing his creative work in us.  But after the first time, we may say, “Thank You,” instead of, “Please.” “Thank You that Your Life is entering into me rebuilding everything toward health.” We may then use our creative imaginations and make a picture in our minds of that perfection which we hope will be ours. And finally we may look steadily at that picture until it is accomplished. Thus by harnessing the imagination and training the will, we can arouse and build our faith.

Agnes tells of a little boy with a leaky heart. She has him imagine himself as a football player running down the field with a healthy heart each night. A month later his heart was perfect. Thus he had wrestled with God as his partner against the powers of destruction and had prevailed. The will of God for him was not a leaky heart, but health.

I am not going to question if the boy was really healed. I believe her. I am just not convinced that it was the power of the game he played each night.

Chapter III Turning on the Light of God’s Creative Energy

I always cringe when a preacher starts getting into physics. And I cringe a bit when Agnes does it. She states that we are made of energy. But we are made of both matter and energy and one can be converted into the other. So it is a true statement but only tells part of the story. But when she then makes a theological application:

when we establish a closer connection with God in prayer, we should receive more abundant life—an increased flow of energy.

Here is where we take what she learned and readjust it consistent with what know of God and of His universe. I don’t know what to call it (she calls it energy), but we definitely receive more from God as we get closer to Him in prayer (e.g. “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you.”). I just don’t want to call it energy which has a clear material definition in physics.

The vibration of God’s light is so very real that even a child can feel it, and it was my experiments with children that showed me the action of an invisible but powerful light-vibration shining from the Father of Lights.

I too, along with those that we have prayed for, have experienced heat when God’s healing power is in action. I often use it as an indication that God is at work healing. And it is very physical and can be measured with physical instruments. I am just not ready to call it “the vibration of God’s light.” I see it more as the Spirit of God moving upon the body and setting in motion the body’s natural healing mechanism. Have you ever felt the heat around a wound or a sprain. This is the healing action of our body.  So, let’s just allow Agnes the right to call it electricity or God’s vibrating light. No problem. Let’s keep learning from her, because as Dallas Willard told a skeptical Richard Foster, “When Agnes prays, things happen.” Here how she describes how to initiate this healing power of the Spirit:

I just forget everything else and think about God and believe that He can do it. And He turns it [the electricity] on, and when He is through with it, He turns it off.”

She gets a “scientific” explanation from a scientist that confirms her understanding and terminology. But again, let’s keep drawing upon what is real and factual in what she is saying. She notes that children perceive the heat more often than adults. This is not my experience, but she has prayed with more children than me – so let’s go with it. She explains that this is because our hearts have become dull to God’s truth as adults. And that may very well be. She later makes another deduction that this manifestation of heat is literally God himself.

In talking with an injured G.I., Agnes tells him that God can hurry up the natural processes that go on in the body. Here is how she told him to pray:

Come into me now and help nature in my body to mend this bone, and do it quick. Thanks. I believe you’re doing it. Then make a picture in your mind of the leg well. Shut your eyes and see it that way. See the bone all built in and the flesh strong and perfect around it. Then after you see the leg well, give a pep talk to all the healing forces of your body. Say, ‘Look here, I’m boss inside of me and what I say goes. Now get busy and mend that leg.’ And then congratulate them and tell them they’re doing a good job, because they won’t work for you unless you encourage them. And after this, forget them and think of the life outside of you again, and say Thank You, God. I believe it’s going to be O.K.’ ”

Again, let’s not throw out the baby with the bath water. We are told to believe what we have asked for. So for Agnes, that means to visualize it as well. That has not been part of my healing prayer protocol, but I like it as a tangible way to believe that we have received what we have asked for. I believe that as Jesus spoke to inanimate objects we can speak to our bodies as part of the healing process. So let’s move on.

Here is her summary:

    1. Choose the same time and the same place every day, make yourself comfortable and relax.
    2. Remind yourself of the reality of a life outside yourself.
    3. Ask that life to come in and increase life in your body
    4. Make a picture in your mind of your body well
    5. And give thanks that this is being accomplished

I like this as something simple we can give people and see nothing out of alignment with God’s way of healing.

Another step she adds for the prayer:

In order to receive God’s life in the body, we must first be able to forget the body so that we can quiet the mind and concentrate the spiritual energies on God.

Quieting the mind is not easy she recognizes. Our nerves can become our masters.

We must teach them to be our servants, adjusting themselves to our demands for more or less tension. This can be done by a simple process of re-education.

Nerves are like children. They respond to suggestion better than to command. In fact the subconscious mind that controls the forces of the body has an almost wanton disregard for command. “Relax!” we tell ourselves sternly, and the nerves laugh at us and tighten up more than ever. “Now you’re relaxing,” we congratulate them, and with a pleased smile they relax. So, we speak gently and soothingly to the nerves all the way up the body and in the head.

Let us now open our spirits to receive the more abundant life of God. How easy this becomes when we realize that God is not a far-away sovereign, but is actually the medium in which we live

This last step—the step of giving thanks! God is standing before us with the answer in His hands. But unless we reach out our hands and take it by giving thanks for it, we are not apt to receive it

I am not sure how to respond to this bit about nerves are like children. I have practiced speaking to parts of my body. I am just not sure about some parts responding better to suggestion than to command.

Chapter IV The Re-Birth of Faith: Re-Educating the Sub-Conscious

When we quote scientists as providing foundational evidence for either our theology or our praxis, we need to be careful – or at least footnote it. Agnes starts off this chapter telling us that psychologists tell us that “nine-tenths of our thoughts lie below the level of consciousness.” I don’t know what she is talking about. What are thoughts? And what is consciousness? Without footnotes or even definitions we are left in the dark. And then it gets even more muddled. She mixes the non-conscious mind (which controls our breathing) with the sub-conscious mind – where there are true thoughts. And then says that what controls our breathing is an inner control center that is part of spiritual body that “acts on orders from God Himself.”

I have to stop. Let’s see if we can summarize what she is trying to say independent of her muddled science. She certainly is trying to prove scientifically that if I say: “I am getting a cold” that this sends a conflicting message to our white blood cells who are trying to fight the cold. Without finding out if this is scientifically provable (and it should be measurable), it still doesn’t make sense. Why does telling our immune system that trouble is coming tell it to slack off. Isn’t prevention the best medicine? Advance warning to put the immune system on high alert? Agnes says it says “Slacken off your defense.” Our adrenal system responds to advance warnings of trouble ahead. Why do our white blood cells not follow suit.

She addresses the question about how are we to deal with accusing thoughts. She says that we should not resist them. She uses Jesus’ words out of context and says: “Resist not evil.” But in the Greek, the word is an adjective. So, most translations include the implied “person.” We are not to resist the evil person. “Evil resisted gains strength.” So what does she think James is telling us: “Resist the devil and he will flee” so that he can gain more strength? She gives us two solutions: Turning our back on troubling thoughts and replacing them with a new set of thought patterns.

if we find ourselves thinking, “One of my headaches is coming on,” we correct that thought.

“Whose headaches?” we say. “God’s light shines within me and God doesn’t have headaches!”

Sorry. I just cannot support that approach from Scripture even though she is trying to prove the approach from science.

There is no record in the whole Bible of a holy man who remained an invalid.

That is except:

    • Isaac’s eyes were dim – he couldn’t differentiate between Jacob and Esau (Genesis 27:1)
    • Jacob – who was given a limp by an angel.(Genesis 32:31-32)
    • Mephibosheth – who was lame and remained faithful to David even as he was deceived by his servants. (2 Samuel 19:24-30)
    • Ahijah the prophet – eyes were dim (1 Kings 14:4)
    • Elisha was ill before his death (2 Kings 13:14)
    • Philippians 2:27 reveals that Epaphroditus had been extremely ill, indeed he had nearly died, but the Lord had mercy on him.
    • Timothy – who had frequent ailments (1 Timothy 5:23)
    • 2 Timothy 4:20 tells us that Paul left Trophimus ill at Miletus

She then says:

we find no instance of an acceptance of illness as the will of God

Paul told Timothy to drink a little wine for his frequent ailments. Isn’t that accepting illness? Wine wasn’t to heal but rather to dull our sense of pain. I hope you the reader don’t think I am nitpicking. I want to learn as much from her as I can about praying for healing because she had a track record that cannot be denied. One other option is to say her success was a sign meant to deceive. That I don’t accept either. Thank goodness we don’t need perfect theology to heal.

Chapter V The Law of Love

This chapter was confusing to me and did not add anything to my understanding of God’s working in the world. Also, there are a number of statements that seem just flat out wrong. So, my summary may not capture what Agnes was trying to capture. It seems she is saying that there is a current of God’s love that can be blocked by us – by “hatred and fear and misery” as well as anger.  Jesus is the one who has unblocked this flow of love.

She claims that the early followers of Jesus expected Him to come back in their lifetime (which appears to be true) but when He didn’t they became discouraged.

Sadly they postponed their glorious vision of a new heaven and a new earth. Sadly they laid aside their hopes of being “clothed upon with immortality” and accepted death.

I am not sure when she thought “accepted death” happened. Nor do I know exactly what she is saying. Do we never accept death? It seems like Stephen accepted death and he was pretty early on. Paul accepted his approaching death a few decades later.

Towards the end of the chapter, she attempts to instruct us towards a pathway to healing as follows:

And we become perfected in love by trying to do it. The method is so simple that any child can learn it. It is merely to connect in spirit with the love of God, send that love to the other person, and see him re-created in goodness and joy and peace.

It is not exactly clear how she wants us to “send that love” but it appears that we do this by projecting it with our thoughts. She gave another example of a man who stopped a bull from attacking by following her method:

“I am God’s man and you are God’s bull,” he thought in silence. “God made both of us, and in the name of Jesus Christ I say that there is nothing but loving-kindness between us.”

When asked what to do if an armed burglar was in your house:

One would project into the burglar’s mind the love of God, by seeing him as a child of God and asking God to bless him. And if one were strong enough in faith and love, the burglar’s mind would change. He would leave the family unharmed and go away.

There is the clear call to pray in this case but I am not so sure that we are to project God’s love into another’s mind. Of course she covers all situations by saying it all depends on your being strong in faith and love. So, if your family gets killed, you have an excuse – you weren’t strong in faith.  I don’t see this in Jesus’ teaching at all.  Maybe by projecting love she means – love your enemies. But I don’t see Jesus telling us that if we love our enemies, they won’t kill us. Ask Stephen.

Chapter VI Re-Education in Love: Healing Laws Liberated

If we apply her teaching to the question, “How do I love my enemies?” we can follow her train of thought:

He must re-educate his subconsciousness. He must form new thought habits of love and compassion and friendliness and joy, so that his instinctive and natural reaction to every situation, every person and every animal may be one of love.

the real reason why most people do not learn Christian love is quite simply that they do not want to do so.

Let us think of the person whom we have selected for the day’s assignment and hold up this person before the mind, surrounding him with the light of God’s love. Some of us see in our minds the picture of Jesus Christ and then see the other person, placing the picture of the one we would forgive upon the picture of Christ. Having done this, we say to the one whom we would learn to like, “I forgive you in the name of Jesus Christ, and I give thanks to God because you are now forgiven. Amen.”

We then proceed to the second step of forgiveness, which is to say, “I bless so-and-so in the name of the Lord,” and to look with expectancy for the changes that the Lord’s blessing will accomplish in her.

We learn to give forth love in learning to forgive our enemies. Then we learn to give a forgiving and healing love to all who cross our paths and need our love

Finally love flows through us spontaneously and naturally to both man and beast—and completing the circuit, flows back to us again from God.

Although this may seem like a “turn-the-crank” fool-proof method, it does in fact have some merit as steps to loving your enemies.

Chapter VII – In the Shadow of His Wings

Heads up on a science alert. Most X-Rays and Cosmic rays do pass through thexray comsic ray body (duh – that’s why we take X-Rays). But hardly any visible light passes through the body completely. If the skin is thin enough, you can see some light passing through our fingers. Our eyes can see some bright light shining through our eyelids. So, watch out for: “Sunlight penetrates the open spaces of the body”

As a sponge is in the ocean and the ocean is in a sponge, so we are in God and He is in us. Rufus Mosley

I actually love that analogy of us in God and God in us.

Many a healing is not finished simply because the one who prays does not hold his faith long enough, is unwilling to seek help in prayer or does not know where to find that help.

[Once, I] spilled boiling oil on my hands while officiating over the cookstove. If I lose my temper at such times, the hand is burned. If I do not lose my temper, the hand is not burned.

As our prayers, our mental training and our acts of forgiveness fuse into a high consciousness of God’s indwelling, we become more and more aware of an inner source of power that can be tapped at will.

This being so, let us gladly seek Him without as well as within.

Again, the principle which I accept is a good one. Our awareness of God’s indwelling can be very instrumental in our ability to tap into His power for healing. If we are going to pray for healing, we need to be as much in God’s presence as possible. But the degree to which that happens does not guarantee healing.

Chapter VIII – Doctors, Ministers, and God

I like the following comment:

If all men could eat only of the tree of Life, planted in the center of the garden, and never absorb into their beings the results of knowing both good and evil, men could live above death and above the pain and illness that lead to death.

Somehow, in all the years that I have read about and heard about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, Agnes’ comment opened my eyes. “never absorb into their beings the results of knowing both good and evil” is a great insight. I always had a bit of a question about what was wrong about knowing evil. Paul says that we are not unaware of the devil’s schemes. That’s knowing evil, and that is a good thing. Wise as serpents to the evil around us is a good thing.

A couple of weeks ago I preached a sermon on intimacy with God, and one of my subpoints was about how the Hebrews understood knowing and knowledge. For them, it wasn’t just an intellectual fact-retrieving knowledge but an intimate and personal encounter with the object of their knowing. No wonder we don’t want to partake of the knowledge of evil. And Agnes’ comment about the pain of the results of having that kind of knowledge in us is helpful. Wonderful.

But then:

It will be possible for one who daily receives from God his spiritual sustenance to live without illness or decay for a longer and longer period of time.

Really? Oh well! Can’t get everything right all of the time.

Chapter IX Being the Lord’s Instrument for the Healing of the Sick

Agnes has talked of this before in our posture of praying for others, but somehow I am hearing it for the first time:

Forgetting the heart, I fixed my mind upon the presence of Our Lord and invited Him to enter and use me.

How often is that the way I pray? I often concentrate on the one being prayed for and attempting to hear God’s direction as to how to pray. But the preparation described by her seems good and right. Start by concentrating on the presence of the Lord.

But if God had wanted him to live, why wouldn’t He heal him without a healer?” some people ask. God wants us to have electric lights. But He will not put them in a house without an electrician. God has graciously endowed us with the dignity of free will.

When addressing the fact that some who are healed and then gradually lose the joy of knowing Jesus, she attributes it to giving back. Those who continue in the joy and love of Jesus are those who gave back to God and to her. Those who did not continue in joy are those who never give back. She takes “As you give, so shall you receive” and makes it “As you have received, so shall you give.” I am not to sure of this logical reversal. She calls it a law of God that must operate in this world yet she makes: “If you speed, you will go to jail” into “If you go to jail, you will speed.” This can easily lead to a doctrine of works. I have received and therefore I must give back.  It is very different from “Freely you have received; freely give.” Jesus emphasizes the word “freely” by using it twice.

It is not necessary to “be a healer.” It is only necessary to learn to pray for others as effectively as we do for ourselves. … I present first a simple human way of becoming a receiving and transmitting center for love-healing by the laying on of hands.

Chapter X – Further Hints on Healing

I love this bit of instruction and wish that all who hear from God and pray for others to be healed would practice these simple disciplines:

the ominous phrase, “I feel that it is my duty to tell you this.” Neither will we say, “God told me to come to see you.” Maybe He did, but it is most unwise to mention it.

If guided to go to a stranger, we are forced to state the purpose of our call immediately. “I heard your husband was very sick,” we can say. “And I came because I think I can help you.”

Having entered the door, let us not hasten to instruct. Rather, let us quiet ourselves and prepare to listen with the deep comprehension of the one who loves

Often as I sit and listen with keen and loving attention to a tale of woe I pray, “Oh God, please make her say the thing that will lead me into her mind.”

And I go into that door and make myself a part of that problem, no matter how trivial or sordid it may be. I do not stay on the outside and offer sage advice.

“You mustn’t think like that” may be helpful for a third or fourth visit, but it is almost sure to be wrong for the first.

“I surround myself with the protection of Almighty God and in the name of Jesus Christ I say that nothing shall get through to hurt me.

Thus we can enter into the patient’s sorrow with a deep serenity, holding the doors of the mind open always for joy. We grieve with the patient because we love him and so his sorrows are ours.

Yet we rejoice because we know that God through us is mighty to lead him out of sorrow into joy.

How many lives and minds would be saved if only Christians knew that in dealing with the mentally ill, one does not appeal to their reason!

I laid my hands upon her head and communed in my mind with the Father of this child and with His greatest representative among men, my friend Jesus. When I felt His presence without and His authority within, I said loudly and firmly, “In the name of Jesus Christ I direct and order that from this time forth, this child shall never again be afraid at night.”

She doesn’t talk a lot about healing mental illness. But it appears as if she has some experience attempting it.

This is not as easy as it sounds. For in order to make the sick mind well the healer must believe unfalteringly that it will be well.

it is much easier to heal the body than to heal the mind.

How many times have I done this!

A natural impulse when God first sends His “electricity” through our hands is to attach too much importance to this outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace.

I found myself at one time watching eagerly for this new current of life that flowed through me, feeling disappointed if it did not come and pleased if it did. This distracted my attention from God and focused it on myself.

The essence of all healing is to become so immersed in the Being of God that one forgets oneself entirely

Sometimes the sudden increase of life in the afflicted part causes temporarily an increase of pain, either at that moment or a few hours later

Chapter XI – The Healing of Emotions

This warning is useful but is outside my experience base:

[there is ] a danger in spiritual healing—the danger of becoming either emotionally sterile or emotionally unstable.

This simple practice is useful both for us and for those we pray for with damaged emotions:

rooting and grounding of the emotions in the ordinary, human love of Jesus Christ, expressed through the normal channels of everyday life.

This is a profound truth that again, I either forgot, or it is truly a new insight:

Acts and words can be directly commanded and controlled. We can decide what we are going to say and what we are going to do, but we cannot always decide how we are going to feel.

emotions are not under the direct control of our wills.

I love this idea that we can control our actions and our words but we cannot always control our emotions.

We have practiced and taught this next truth for years. She presents a reason to pray in teams:

[Practicing healing alone can close] our eyes to those lingering faults of our human nature that lie deep in the subconscious.

She believes that the regular practice of confession is a path towards healing emotions. Here are her simple steps towards that end.

Choose the same time and the same place every day for an act of preparation for confession

Relax and lift the mind into the presence of God, and do so with a pencil and paper in the hand. Then divide one’s life into seven periods.

Ask the Holy Spirit of God to bring into the remembrance any unforgiven sins (or any uncomfortable memories as we would probably call them) from these years that still linger in the subconscious.

Write down these sins as they come to mind. Write them down simply, briefly, without using names or mentioning circumstances or any kind of alibis. Having done this, set aside the paper and forget the whole matter until the next day.

On the next day at the same time and the same place take the second period of one’s life and do the same thing. And so on through the seven days.

I am not sure about the same time and place – but I have begun this process but have not finished it yet. I think it is worthwhile.

She describes how she did this and then brought this before a priest who forgave her in the name of the church and offered absolution. She felt nothing until she started home. Then she experienced the Holy Spirit’s washing and cleansing. She knew that Jesus loved her and forgave her.

Through the confessional my heart caught on fire. Its dullness and boredom was burned away, its coldness was turned to warmth, its pride was melted into humility

I had to believe that God had the power and the will to heal that specific disease of that specific person through me, at that time.

Chapter XII The Healing Power of Forgiveness

Agnes returns to this central theme of her belief in healings that don’t happen:

Why did not every Christian who repented on his own knees show forth the results in a life of power? For the same reason that every Christian who believes in God does not receive healing—lack of faith.

In this chapter she continues her treatise on the power of forgiveness – some through the confessional some metaphysically. We are to discern what to use with each.

When looking to pray for healing and forgiveness she offers these two ways:

the way of affirmation and of power and the way of repentance and humility… For the law of rhythm, of balance, holds throughout the universe

We are to balance these two ways of dealing with healing and forgiveness. Throughout this she is demonstrating the need to be attuned horizontally and vertically when praying for people for forgiveness or for healing. Again, something that we practice and have taught.

Chapter XIII Intercession: Healing from a Distance

Agnes brings up something that I believe but rarely practice. We pray at a distance for healing but rarely to invoke the forgiving power that Jesus gave us at a distance. Some of us are okay with hearing a confession and offering absolution when in the presence of the person. But at a distance?

This law [of forgiveness of sins] will work at a distance as well as in the presence of the sick person. But the method of intercession is much more difficult than healing at the bedside of the sick.

In this chapter she reiterates something we teach:

The first step in intercessory prayer is to find out the will of God

Let us begin our intercessory prayer then by quieting ourselves, holding each suggested person up before the Lord and seeking for His guidance concerning our duty toward that person.

[She once was praying for a child and] asked His instructions concerning this matter. The answer was almost as clear as a voice within my mind: “Pray for him now, from this place, and he will recover.”

I prayed, and felt after the prayer that sense of peace and of release that means that the prayer-work is finished. So I knew that the child had recovered.

As we become skilled in prayer, we dare go one step further, to ask “Lord, will he recover?” and then face the answer.

Here again is her explanation of why all are not healed when it is God’s perfect will. We depart ways on this but she at least addresses the possibility.

God’s perfect will for this His child is life, as it is always life. But His infinite wisdom knows that the sum of the skill of the doctors, the faith of the patient and my own spiritual development is such that in this life His will is not to be completed.

Here again she reiterates some simple steps towards intercessory prayer which I find helpful:

the first step in intercessory prayer is to quiet ourselves before God and with His guidance to choose our path, fearing not to follow it wherever it may lead.

The second step is to contact the power that heals and fill ourselves full of it. Love is the healer. In order to fill ourselves with His whole Being, let us think of Him, imagining His presence, seeing Him with the eyes of the mind, trying to love Him with the heart

Let us ask Him to enter into our spirits and fill us with His own consciousness of the Fatherhood of God; to enter into our minds and think within us His own thoughts; to enter into our hearts and feel through us His own love.

Let us beseech Him to come and dwell within us. Let us ask Him to enter into our spirits and fill us with His own consciousness of the Fatherhood of God; to enter into our minds and think within us His own thoughts; to enter into our hearts and feel through us His own love.

This insight is again powerful sounding and new to me. I cannot speak to how valid it is:

And the success of our prayer depends as much on the depth of our love to man as on the height of our love to God

Those in convents and monasteries … have learned to rise into God, but they have not learned to sink again into man. They reach a high state of religious contemplation and there they stay.

Then if we would help man through intercession, we must hold God by one hand and man by the other hand, never separating ourselves either from the love of God or from the love of man.

I like this quote she offers:

Thomas Kelly says, “First He takes the world out of our hearts, so that we can give our hearts to Him. Then He puts the world back into our hearts, so that we can give Him to the world

Chapter XIV Two or Three Gathered Together

This chapter is devoted to praying together for others:

These are different from the fact-finding step that John Wimber taught and that I have believed:

For the one who would send forth health must think health and nothing else. If he would inquire of the patient’s symptoms let him do so at some other time, and not turn the hour of prayer into a gossip circle.

If we can see Christ, and Him self-given for the patient, and then see the patient well, healed by the love of Christ, we will be sending forth a pure stream of that love

I saw my wife shrink back from praying for others during a season when our own daughter was chronically ill for 3 years. But I am not sure that this is a valid prohibition. If this were true, I would never intercede. I love the scene from Season 3 of The Chosen where little James is a cripple and yet one of Jesus’ disciples. The issue that Jesus healed others and not him has obviously not escaped his notice. But when Jesus sends him out with the 12 to heal, little James has to address the issue with Jesus. Basically, Jesus told him that it would be even more powerful for the people to see one cripple heal another.

One should not attempt any work of intercession while in the grip of his own pain. Let him first rise above his own illness, and then he can see clearly the wholeness of another.

This is a curious statement for me since the miraculous healings that I saw with my wife Barbara were cancer and arthritis. Even now, my arthritis in my knee has basically been a non-issue through prayer. [At age 74 I began running again!]

Organic diseases, such as cancer and arthritis, are naturally much more difficult than functional diseases. Nevertheless they are sometimes healed.

I like her reasoned answer about concentrating our prayers on our family when there is so much need outside our family.

No mother would refuse to feed her child because she could not at the moment feed every hungry child on earth

This chapter contains several stories of healing and protection.

She then lays out some simple steps for praying for protection:

How can one set in motion this protective force and so respond to the prayer-requests of those in danger?

First, let us be still and know that He is God. He is from everlasting to everlasting,

Let us know also that He is love, and that He has made us of Himself and for Himself.

Here is a broad claim that I cannot support:

We must keep this clearly within our minds, for if we once accept death through man’s hate as God’s will for anyone, we lose the power to protect a single one in prayer.

This stems from her belief that death is never God’s will for anyone.

Chapter XV For the Healing of the World

I haven’t said much about the terminology that Agnes uses that I amEarth uncomfortable with but here is one:

Our thought-vibrations are not limited by time or space. The sorrow of a nation is the sorrow of the world, for it creates in the air a thought-vibration of sorrow.

I am not convinced there are actually thought-vibrations that spread sorrow throughout the world. She uses this phrase nine times in the book and doesn’t really explain it. She approaches it as if it is not just a metaphorical description of world views and attitudes of people. But as if it really is some physical thing that happens.  If she means that our thoughts can be transmitted mediated through the Holy Spirit I believe that. But I think she really believes that they are physical. She thinks that we can transmit love and healing in the same way. Lord teach me if there is some reality You wish to teach me concerning this.

This chapter is all about the Biblically sound idea that our prayers are not to just be offered for those we know but the whole world. Certainly Paul and Jesus modeled this. Jesus, use this chapter to make this more of a reality in my life.

How can we pray for the immense needs that are scattered across the globe. Agnes offers some good suggestions for approaching the overwhelming needs of the whole world through prayer:

My own answer to this is to simplify my prayer-objectives; to choose only a few objects for prayer at a time and to make them plain, concise and concrete

In other words, if we are going to pray effectively for the world or a sick friend or one in danger or anything else, we must believe that the thing for which we pray is at that moment being accomplished.

So our first step in world prayer is the seeking of guidance. “Lord, for what or for whom shall I pray at this time so as to further the coming of Thy kingdom?”

Pray for people not just vague nations . Once God has revealed some leaders or people in these nations,

One by one we bless these leaders of nations, hold them up into the light of God’s love and send the love of Christ into their minds.

She encourages us to do this in groups – not individually

The ones we pray for healing are normally open to the healing – but the leaders of the world are usually closed minded. …But how can we direct this great flow of life into a closed mind? By repenting not only of our own sins but of the sins of the world. … And by taking that one to the cross of Christ and there receiving for him forgiveness, healing and life.

This suggested method of prayer for the world, then consists of two parts: first, simplifying our prayer-objectives, and second, praying for the world in the sacramental as well as in the metaphysical way…confessing, that is, the sins of our nation and our world, repenting for them and doing penance for them in our own name and in the name of the nation . . .and having done so, seeing by faith the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven on this earth.

My Conclusions

Agnes has done a valuable service to the Kingdom of God. In her quirky way, she led the way for generations of healing ministries to apply her simple techniques and heal many. You can see her teachings being modified and worked out in the ministries of John Wimber, Francis MacNutt and Dallas Willard.

Here are my takeaways from the book.

Scientific approachEven though she gets a lot of the science wrong, I love her attempt at using the scientific method to learn how to successfully pray for people and see them healed. It is also my experience that there is much benefit in praying for the body to do what it was made to do – heal thyself.

Prayer of CommandI am going to think of Amen from now on as a prayer of command. So be it. Dallas Willard’s amen is sometimes: “And that’s the way it’s supposed to be.”

Start Simple– This is an important principle that runs throughout the book. We may disagree with what is a simple project in prayer, but we agree on the KISS principle. 

The Process of PrayingI love the simple steps that she offers. But I especially like waiting on God at the beginning of a prayer time.

Visualization of the HealingI was not taught this, nor have I practiced it. We are told to expect to receive what we have asked for, so I think visualizing it is a good thing and will alter my process to include this.

Focusing on God’s Presence – The strong emphasis on the pray-er being focused on the presence of God is powerful. I am changing the way I practice healing prayer based on this principle.

Prayer ProjectsI love the idea of prayer projects and have been doing them for years with pretty amazing success. This is a much undertaught methodology for prayer.

Team approach to Intercessory Prayer – This, too, is a much underutilized method of praying. I love the idea of starting small and focused.

Prayer for Protection This is something we learned a while ago and have taught our prayer teams how to do this. Agnes adds some additional insight to the process that I find helpful.

The Healing Power of Forgiveness – Although there was nothing new in this for me, her teaching in this area is very much needed. I am encouraged to pray at a distance the prayers of forgiveness that I have prayed in person. Though not new, I don’t practice it currently and will!

Practical Guidelines on Approaching Healing Prayer – These are very practical and well worth teaching.

[1] She says that when we try to heal just by asking, we are missing the importance of being filled with God Himself.

Book Summary: Becoming Dallas Willard by Gary Moon

Becoming Dallas Willard by Gary Moon

This is a fascinating biography of a man who had a tremendous impact on me. This book, by a professor of philosophy for many years, a family man, and Christian author and mentor, traces Dallas’ life back to its roots. It is immensely helpful in seeing the path he took to “become” Dallas Willard. I am not going to summarize Dallas’ life story here. Get the book. You won’t regret it. Instead, I am going to provide quotes and occasional commentary.

Dallas and Salvation

In typical Dallas fashion, Dallas blows the sides off what we had presupposed about salvation.

What does it mean to be saved? It means eternal living here and now; a life of interaction with Jesus here and now, and that is the only description of Eternal Life in the New Testament.  See John 17;3

This quote led John Ortberg (a good friend and disciple of Dallas) to write Eternity is in Session.

The author commented on Dallas’ view of salvation:

Salvation for Dallas meant far more than merely a decision.  It meant a new way of living, healing of the soul, living with God in the present moment.

The book describes an account when Richard Foster helped a man in the church to accept Jesus as his Savior. Dallas’s response: “Well, I hope that was good for him and Ieads him into accepting Jesus as his life. ”

Dallas was not all that convinced that just praying a prayer converted a man. A man must become an apprentice of Jesus to become one of His followers. For Dallas, salvation was “a new way of living, healing of the soul, living with God in the present moment.”

Some of Dallas’ Books

Renovation of the Heart

The following quote might provide the motivation for reading Renovation of the Heart:

A carefully cultivated heart will, assisted by the grace of God, foresee, forestall, or transform most of the painful situations before which others stand like helpless children saying “Why?”

Wouldn’t we all love a carefully cultivated heart? Quoting Dallas’s wife Jane concerning Renovation of the Heart, Moon wrote:

Because of my decades as a therapist, my favorite chapters were six and seven, “Transforming the Mind,” about thoughts and feelings. I even have a favorite sentence: “The single most important thing in a person’s mind is . . .” Now, isn’t that an attention getter?

By the way, Dallas finished the sentence with: “What you think about God.”

The Divine Conspiracy

When asked what his book, The Divine Conspiracy is all about, Willard said that it

presents discipleship to Jesus as the very heart of the gospel. The really good news for humanity is that Jesus is now taking on students in the master class of life. …Whereas the gospel of atonement or sin management is that your sins can be forgiven, the gospel of the kingdom is that you can live in the kingdom of God here and now. …. a person can have the gospel of sin management and continue to run life on their own. But if we are alive in the kingdom now, we know that our sins are forgiven, precisely because the life of heaven is now in us, and we are learning to live the moments of our life with God. … To glorify God means to think and act in such a way that the goodness, greatness, and beauty of God are constantly obvious to you and all those around you.

Dallas’ Surprising Choice

One recorded incident that I found interesting was when someone asked Dallas, ‘If you could only bring one book [besides the Bible] with you, what would it be? Much to everyone’s surprise, he said The Road Less Traveled by M. Scott Peck. This was certainly one of the most fascinating books I have ever read.

There is an extended story about how the book Hearing God came about. Don’t miss my summary of this book.

Big Ideas of Willard

Sin Management

Willard offered another landmark idea: we are not called to “sin management.”

Simply managing sins does not lead to the abundant life that Jesus promised

The Availability of the Kingdom

Dallas’ interjection of “availability” is brilliant and precise. When Jesus said: “The Kingdom of God is at hand” He was saying: “It’s available.”

The good news is more than the kingdom of God per se. The gospel is, more precisely, the availability of the kingdom of God. … Availability is what constitutes the news of his good news

The Reality of Real Things

One of the battles he faced academically was a rising school of philosophy that denied the reality of real things. Dallas pushed the envelope and declared that even intangible things like the kingdom of God are real:

You can go to the “thing” itself and experience and grasp its reality, even if that “thing” is the kingdom of God on earth.

Play

One doesn’t think of Dallas as playful. Certainly not from his writings. But various stories in the book give us another picture of the man. He saw great value in play.

Work is the creation of value. Play is the creation of value that is not necessary.

The Universe as a Safe Place

One of Dallas’ most profound truths that was brand new to me was:

For those who have put their life in God’s hand, the Universe is a safe place.

You must truly live this truth to understand it. Who cannot catch this truth that the universe is  a safe place for those in God’s hand in all of the teachings of Jesus and Paul? Me! I missed it.  Jesus told us not to worry and be like the birds depending on their heavenly Father to feed them. (See the end of Matthew 6)  Paul told us that all things work together for good for those who love God. (See Romans 8:28).  Examples of understanding truth by living came from people like Lacy Borgo: “It was his idea that the universe is perfectly safe that completely disrupted my life,” she recalls.

I remember reading it for the first time and thinking the idea that God is completely for us and that all he created is therefore slanted in our favor was wrong, or at best it was crazy. Since my childhood everything I had learned said otherwise. This fearful line of thinking was at the root of my sense of self and my sin. To give it up, to trust that God was good and that there was goodness to be found would mean the undoing of me and my sinful habits—it would mean a dangerous freedom.

The Secret of the Ordinary

“The obviously well-kept secret of the ordinary,” Dallas once wrote, “is that it is made to be a receptacle of the divine, a place where the life of God flows. . . . That is why everyone, from the smallest child to the oldest adult, naturally wants in some way to be extraordinary, outstanding, making a unique contribution or, if all else fails, wants to be thought so—if only for a brief time.”

Dallas’ View of Humanity

I have loved this quote of Dallas for a long time and have often compared it to an atheist’s view of our destiny.

Bertrand Russell View:

You are the product of causes that have no purpose or meaning. Your origin, your growth, your hopes, fears, loves, beliefs are the outcome of accidental collections of atoms. No fire, heroism, or intensity of thought or feeling can preserve your life from beyond the grave. All the devotion, all the inspiration, all the labor of all the ages are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system. The whole temple of human achievement must inevitably be buried in the debris of a universe in ruins. That’s what we’re all headed for.

Dallas’ View:

Our destiny is to be part of a tremendously creative team effort, under unimaginably splendid leadership, on an inconceivably vast plane of activity, with ever more comprehensive cycles of productivity and enjoyment. God’s aim in human history is the creation of an all-inclusive community of loving persons with Himself included as its primary sustainer and most glorious inhabitant. He is even now at work to bring this about. You have been invited, at great cost to God Himself, to be part of this radiant community. You, right there in your life. You will not only survive death, you yourself were made to bear an eternal weight of glory you cannot now even fathom, and you will one day know.

Dallas and People

Richard Foster

There is a lengthy description of Dallas and Richard Foster’s time at a little Friends church. Richard was the young pastor. Dallas a lay leader. It was a living laboratory where Dallas worked out his  ideas about the kingdom of God and discipleship. Moon writes:

What were the explosive ideas explored in the living laboratory? The three most prominent were the kingdom of God as a present reality, salvation as an ongoing life with God, and the participation in spiritual disciplines as a means of transformation.

Agnes Sanford

Dallas greatly respected Agnes Sanford. He had two books with him as he was dying: The Bible and Agnes’ The Healing Light. Moon provides this story from early on in Dallas and Richard Foster’s relationship.

At this time Agnes Sanford was about to begin a three-day conference on prayer at Bill’s church. Dallas suggested to Richard that if he wanted to learn to pray for people, he should attend this conference. Richard, who had read her book The Healing Light, was skeptical. “Why should I?” he replied. “Because,” Dallas said simply, “When Agnes prays things happen.” “You see,” Richard said, “Dallas saw in Agnes someone who actually did it—who went to the ‘thing’ itself, who had a real and interactive relationship with the Trinity. She was fearless.”

Dallas’ Graduate Students

Moon recounts many encounters Dallas had with his grad students:

Dallas believed in pushing against boulders. “Why don’t you go home and push on a large rock for a while!” was the advice a graduate student once got from his mentor when he was faced with a mental block—a common occupational hazard encountered by those who make a living from sustained intellectual work.

For more details about Dallas and People check out:

Eternal Living: Reflections on Dallas Willard’s Teaching on Faith and Formation: Edited by Gary Moon. This contains 30 testimonies from people closest to Dallas. Read it and it will encourage you to become an apprentice of Jesus.

Dallas-isms 

Pithy Phrases

Dallas created pithy phrases that capture big ideas—known as ‘Dallas-isms.'”

    • The fires of heaven burn hotter than the fires of hell.
    • Know does not mean “to know about him.”
    • Don’t be asking for an opportunity to speak, ask for something meaningful to say
    • Knowledge, biblically speaking, always refers to interactive relationship.
    • Reality is what you can count on, and what you run into when you are wrong.
    • Dramatic communications from God are not signs of Christian maturity.
    • Simply managing sins does not lead to the abundant life that Jesus promised.
    • If you want to do what Jesus did on the spot, you have to practice what he did off the spot.
    • Not planning to go to London does not help me get to New York.
    • Consider carefully the type of persons who were first called Christians.
    • An obsession with doing Jesus’ commands may prevent one from being the kind of person he is.
    • Holiness is not different action but different being.
    • What does it mean to be saved? It means eternal living here and now, a life of interaction with Jesus here and now, and that’s the only description of eternal life in the New Testament, John 17:3.
    • The question of the evangelist should be, “If you don’t die tonight, what are you going to do tomorrow?” And the answer should be, “I’m going to trust Jesus with all of my life, with everything, and that will allow me to live in the kingdom of God.

Reality

Another great Dallasism that Mary Poplin turned into a book is the question: “Is reality secular?” I “stole” that idea for a talk I did at an AI Conference which I entitled: “Is Technology Secular?” What is real was a major part of his professional work as a philosopher. But he lightens it up a little for us lay folk:

Reality is what you run into when you’re wrong.

The Philosophy of Dallas

In his relentless pursuit of truth, Dallas was following His master:

Jesus is the kind of person who would be the first to say you must ruthlessly follow the truth wherever it leads.

Coming to the end of oneself is a major theme in advancing the kingdom within our own life for Dallas. Thus he quipped:

Where do you find God? At www.endofyourrope.com

When asked to describe the church, Willard said:

This isn’t a delivery room; it is the nursery. . . .

When asked about our purpose here on earth:

Why did God not take us on up to heaven? . . . We are left here to be witnesses. . . . We are put here to know God. . . . We are put here to arrive at the chief end of man [which is to glorify God]. … How can we glorify God? We glorify God by bearing much fruit. . . . You bear fruit by abiding. And to abide is to rest in. We are left here [to learn how to hear God’s voice and] to learn how to rest in God, to abide in him and bear fruit. . . . How can I abide? We find the answer in John 15:10. If you “obey” you will abide.

Later, he would call obedience the engine that pulls the train for spiritual transformation,

Dallas and Renovaré

Here are some key ideas that the Renovaré Institute (which intellectually founded its ideas on Dallas) teaches.

    1. It is actually possible to become like Jesus.
    2. Living in the kingdom of God: What is the gospel of Christ?
    3. The total human system—all of which is to love God.
    4. Learning how to hear God.
    5. Spiritual disciplines: concept and history.
    6. Salvation as a life lived with God.
    7. Celebrating each of the streams of living water.
    8. Importance of classical devotional literature.
    9. Scripture as fifteen ways of being “with God.”
    10. Being with God in prayer.
    11. Living as an apprentice to Jesus.
    12. Spiritual Formation in the roles of our life.

An Overview of Dallas Willard’s key ideas

    1. To effectively care for one’s spiritual life, you need an adequate understanding of spiritual formation.
    2. The nature of spiritual formation in Christ determines its method of discovery.
    3. Relationship with God is an experiential reality.
    4. The Word of God carries with it God’s experiential presence.
    5. God’s experiential presence (or Word) is inherently transformational.
    6. As embodied persons in relationship with a loving God, informed human participation is essential for spiritual growth.
    7. The good news is that God’s reign is available to anyone who relies on Jesus.
    8. Jesus is the master of living life under God’s reign and he wants to teach his students how to live under that reign in their actual lives.
    9. Students of Jesus will rule the universe with him for eternity.
    10. Sin is primarily a disconnection from the life-giving resources of God.
    11. Bodily disciplines place the regenerate person into contact with the life-giving resources of God.
    12. Understanding formation in Christ involves understanding how to bring the various dimensions of the human self under God’s reign.
    13. Knowledge of the reality of Christ and his kind of life is available.

Dallas and the Bible

To observe someone living in a way that matches the wild descriptions of Jesus makes us want to read the Bible again to find out what we have missed.

To know how much Dallas revered the Scriptures, when asked what spiritual discipline was most helpful to him he said: “Memorizing Scripture.

Our Relationship with God

Dallas once used this metaphor to describe our relationship with God:

The mid-size dog had a solid white coat. His eyes seemed blue, but it was hard to tell as they were clouded by the blindness. As we watched, the woman ran backwards, making large figure-eight patterns. She was dragging her feet across the pebbles and old asphalt as she ran, creating scraping sounds for her dog to hear. The dog had a tennis ball in its mouth and seemed to be laughing with joy as he tried to stay close to her. The woman was smiling back at her companion and saying, “I’m right here.” “I see you.” “I’ve got you.”

We are like this blind dog and God leads us in ways we cannot really see but we hear Him continually telling us: “I’m right here.” “I see you.” “I’ve got you.”

Summary

I cannot summarize this book. Read it and let the Spirit inspire you to form the character of Christ in yourself.

Book Summary Abraham Lincoln – Lessons in Spiritual Leadership

Abraham Lincoln – Lessons in Spiritual Leadership

By Elton Trueblood

Elton Trueblood served as spiritual advisor to American presidents from Hoover to Reagan. Gerald Ford kept a copy of this book on his desk in the Oval Office during his presidency.

This book changed my understanding of Lincoln’s faith. Wonderfully written and with many profound insights, I highly recommend the book to all who have any interest in Lincoln or in Spiritual Leadership

Preface

Here are some quotes from others on Lincoln’s faith:

“He is one of the few men in history, our own history and all history, whose religion was great enough to bridge the gulfs between the sects, and to encompass us all.” Willard Sperry Dean of Harvard Divinity School

“Lincoln,” he said, “has always been my hero in religion and statecraft.” Reinhold Niebuhr

Trueblood challenges us at the end of the preface with this gem:

The next best thing to being great is to walk with the great.

Chapter 1 The Spiritual Pilgrimage of Abraham Lincoln

In this chapter, Trueblood traces the journey of faith that Lincoln walked:

“Underlying all particular decisions was a moral revulsion against human slavery, a mystical sense of the importance of the Union, and an abiding conviction that the divine order could be ascertained and followed.”

I wasn’t aware how deeply Christian his family roots were. In many respects, on this pilgrimage, Lincoln doesn’t come to faith, but he comes back to faith.

Writing to a Quaker about the tension with passivism and responding to oppression, Lincoln said:

“Your people,” he wrote, “have had, and are having, a very great trial. On principle, and faith, opposed to both war and oppression, they can only practically oppose oppression by war.”

Trueblood reflects on that with this:

The difficulty was not that of following a moral principle at personal cost; the difficulty was that of knowing what to do when there is more than one principle, and when the principles clash. …the major key to Lincoln’s greatness is his spiritual depth. … A major element in Lincoln’s greatness was the way in which he could hold a strong moral position without the usual accompaniment of self-righteousness.

One remarkable thing Trueblood highlights was:

The standard which he inaugurated, making it possible to refer to prayer and to divine guidance without embarrassment, has been continued to this day.

Tracing that crucial journey in the early days of the war, Trueblood says:

There were a few hints of theological depth even in the years before the crucial autumn of 1862, but they are the exception rather than the rule. Lincoln’s was the kind of mind that did not reach its true magnitude except in experiences of sorrow and strain.

Chapter 2 – The Agonizing Interlude

This chapter traces the first years of the Civil War and the major turning point in Lincoln’s faith.

Wrestling with the need to address injustices and preserve the Union was a primary focus during this period. Reflecting on this period in Lincoln’s journey, Reinhold Niebuhr said:

This [period] is a nice symbol of the fact that order precedes justice in the strategy of government, but that only an order which implicates justice can achieve a stable peace. An unjust order quickly invites the resentment and rebellion that lead to its undoing.

Chapter 3 – Lincoln and the Bible

I never knew how well Lincoln knew the Bible until reading this book. Lincoln carried a devotional with him for much of the latter part of his life. I even obtained that devotional for my own devotions. It is 365 days of Scripture and a brief reflection, poem, or hymn. https://www.amazon.com/Lincolns-Daily-Devotional-Carl-Sandburg/dp/1429093544/ref=monarch_sidesheet

Lincoln said this to his friend Speed (an atheist) about the reliability of the Bible:

You are wrong, Speed; take all of this Book upon reason that you can, and the balance on faith, and you will live and die a happier man.

Lincoln’s religion reflects in many ways Samuel Johnson’s perspective:

The Christian religion has very strong evidences. It indeed, appears in some degree strange to reason, but in History, we have undoubted facts, against which, in reasoning a priori, we have more arguments than we have for them: but then, testimony has great weight, and casts the balance.

Lincoln believed that God was a God of History. He believed that God took note of the way our founding fathers handled the slavery issue and believed that the Civil War was the day of reckoning for both sides.

Chapter 4 – Lincoln at Prayer

Like with his relationship with the Bible, Trueblood documents Lincoln’s prayer life:

Talking with God seemed to the mature Lincoln more important than talking about Him. …That idea that there could be direct communication between finite minds and the infinite Mind had become, for Lincoln, an idea of overwhelming magnitude.

For more about the steps to discerning God’s will in prayer, check out my post on this topic.

Chapter 5 – Lincoln and the Church

Of course, one of the main arguments against Lincoln’s faith is that he never joined a church. Reading this chapter changed my whole perspective on Lincoln’s view of the church. For the first time, I do not look down on his reasons for not joining a church. What I never knew was how faithful he was to church-going and how influenced he was by some of his pastors. Membership was the real issue for Lincoln.

Listen to this quote of his:

Blessed be God, Who, in this our great trial, giveth us the churches

Chapter 6 – The Final Paradox

God’s Sovereignty

This final chapter addresses the role of God’s sovereignty and man’s free will. Can God be on one side in this great conflict when both sides read the same Bible and pray to the same God? Is God involved in guiding one side or the other without taking sides?

“Guided freedom is a paradox, because the ascription of all the glory to God for anything good that is in us does not imply any destruction of our freedom as human personalities, but precisely the reverse: our actions are never more truly free and personal and human, they are never more truly our own, than when they are wrought in us by God.” Donald Baillie

Lincoln had a pervading sense of the sovereignty of God. An English statesman, John Bright. deeply influenced Lincoln.

“I believe the question [of the role of the sovereignty of God] is in the hand, not of my honorable Friend, … nor in that even of President Lincoln, but it is in the hand of the Supreme Ruler, who is bringing about one of those great transactions in history which men often will not regard when they are passing before them, but which they look back upon with awe and astonishment some years after they are past.” John Bright

God’s Guidance

Lincoln knew very well that it is difficult to look forward and see where the Guiding Hand is leading. But seen from a later perspective, the working out of a plan is sometimes obvious.

God’s hand in the course of events is seen in the working out of an objective moral law. A sin as great as the sin of enslaving other people was bound, thought Bright, to have agonizing consequences for a very long time.

Lincoln believed in Providence, but, in Niebuhr’s terms, he understood “the error of identifying providence with the cause to which the agent is committed.”

Trueblood talks a lot in this chapter about the dangers of invoking God’s will in your decision-making:

When dedicated people forget the ubiquity of this danger, they are almost sure to become self-righteous. Only the person who recognizes that he is personally involved in the evils which he seeks to eliminate has any chance of avoiding this primary moral mistake. Lincoln, conscious as he was of the radical difference between the divine will and the human will, understood that ambiguities appear in the moral stance of even the most dedicated crusaders.

Reinhold Niebuhr said: “It was Lincoln’s achievement to embrace a paradox which lies at the center of spirituality of all western culture; namely, the affirmation of a meaningful history and the religious reservation about the partiality and bias which the human actors and agents betray in the definition of meaning.”

The Role of Paradox

Noting the difference between the faith of Lincoln and Jefferson Davis, Trueblood wrote:

Both Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis were patriotic and also reverent men, but there was a crucial difference between them, because Lincoln appreciated paradox as Jefferson David did not.

“If God now wills the removal of a great wrong and wills also that we of the North as well as you of the South, shall pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will find therein new cause to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God.” Abraham Lincoln

Had Lincoln Lived

Lincoln’s vision for reconstruction was never realized. How might

Just a few days before he was killed,

our country would be different if he had lived?

One who saw this clearly was Winston Churchill, who pointed out that “the death of Lincoln deprived the Union of the guiding hand which alone could have solved the problems of reconstruction and added to the triumph of armies those lasting victories which are gained over the hearts of men.”  At the Cabinet meeting on … the very day on which he was shot, the President spoke of Robert E. Lee and other Confederate leaders with kindness.

His only certainty lay in the conviction that God will never cease to call America to her true service, not only for her sake but for the sake of the world. He desired unity and he knew that vision is the secret of unity.

As always, this summary gives you just a taste of the treasures Trueblood has given. Get the book. It was available in my library.

Book Summary Waiting on God by Andrew Murray

Waiting on God by Andrew Murray

Waiting on God

Preface

“PREVIOUS to my leaving for England last year, I had been much impressed by the thought of how, in all our religion, personal and public, we need more of God. I had felt that we needed to train our people in their worship more to wait on God, and to make the cultivation of a deeper sense of His presence, of more direct contact with Him, of entire dependence on Him, a definite aim of our ministry.”

Murray opens this set of 31 meditations with this fact: We need more of God. John Eldredge in his book – Getting Your Life Back – tells us that we would have more of God if we gave more of ourselves to Him. These daily meditations will help you give more of yourself to God as you learn to wait on Him and Him only.

Murray gives another shot over the bow: “The great lack of our religion is, we do not know God

Oh Lord, train us to wait on You. Train us to cultivate a deeper sense of Your presence. Train us to make more direct contact with You. Train me to be entirely dependent upon You. And Lord, help me to teach others.

“whoever does them [the ways of God] and teaches others, will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:19

“Blessed is the one who does them and teaches others.”

Day 1 WAITING ON GOD: The God of Our Salvation

For God alone my soul waits in silence;
from him comes my salvation. Psalm 62:1

Summary of the Meditation

If salvation “comes from God and is entirely His work” therefore our “first and highest duty is to wait on Him.” Waiting is the only true way to know God. Every problem we have in working out our salvation comes from a “defective knowledge and practice of waiting on God.” Murray equates waiting on God with “absolute and unceasing dependence upon God.”

Murray then tells us why there is this deep need for learning and practicing waiting on God:

The Nature of Man

    • “Man was not [created] to have in himself a fountain of life, or strength, or happiness: the ever-living and only living One was each moment to be the Communicator to him of all that he needed.”
    • “Man’s glory and blessedness was not to be independent, or dependent upon himself, but dependent on a God of such infinite riches and love. Man was to have the joy of receiving every moment out of the fullness of God.”

The Nature of God

    • “God, as Creator, formed man, to be a vessel in which He could show forth His power and goodness.”
    • God began the work of salvation, God will continue it, and God will complete it.
    • “God, as Infinite Love, delights to impart His own nature to His child as fully as He can”

Why don’t Christians know the blessedness of waiting? “Christians do not know … their own absolute poverty and helplessness, that they have no sense of the need of absolute and unceasing dependence, or of the unspeakable blessedness of continual waiting on God.”

“May God teach us the blessedness of waiting on Him.”

Father – where do I not know my own absolute poverty and helplessness. Where am I not in a position of absolute and unceasing dependence? Do I actually believe that there are unspeakable blessings of waiting on You continually?

Day 2 WAITING ON GOD: The Keynote of Life

‘I have waited for Thy salvation, O Lord!’— Gen. 49: 18

Summary of the Meditation

Murray admits that we don’t know exactly what Jacob is talking about in this passage. He is prophesying over his sons’ future destiny. Clearly it is a statement of faith. He then drops this gem on us in this devotion:

God cannot part with His grace, or goodness, or strength, as an external thing that He gives us, as He gives the raindrops from heaven. No; He can only give it, and we can only enjoy it, as He works it Himself directly and unceasingly.

God’s grace comes to us – not as something dispensed from heaven – but He comes with it. This reminds me of something Paul says in Romans 8. “He who did not spare His own Son but gave Him up for us all, how will He not also, with Him, graciously give us all things.” Notice the “with Him.” God comes with all of His good gifts.

And he exhorts us, in our private and public prayers to practice waiting on God.

What holds us back? Murray says: “We hinder Him either by our indifference or by our self effort, so that He cannot do what He would. ”

Father, reveal to me my indifference. Where am I indifferent to You or Your ways? And where am I relying on my own efforts? Have thine own way O Lord.

Day 3 WAITING ON GOD: The True Place of the Creature

These all look to you,
to give them their food in due season.
28 When you give it to them, they gather it up;
when you open your hand, they are filled with good things. ESV Psalm 104:27-28

They all wait for You
To give them their food in due season.
28 You give to them, they gather it up;

Open wide

You open Your hand, they are satisfied with good. NASB Psalm 104:27-28

Summary of the Meditation

“Just as much as it was God’s work to create, it is His work to maintain. As little as the creature could create itself, is it left to provide for itself? The whole creation is ruled by the one unalterable law of— waiting upon God!”

Murray is telling us that God does not leave us to fend for ourselves. He provides. Our job is to wait on Him. That can easily be misinterpreted to say: God will bring me a job. I just need to wait for Him to do it. Clearly Murray isn’t saying that. He goes on to say that the word wait in Hebrew is used to inspect a wall. So waiting in not passive. It is actively looking. Looking for the job that God will provide. But not being anxious about it. He will provide. I will pursue – actively inspecting the walls of employment.

“And just as this is the very place and nature of God, to be unceasingly the supplier of every want in the creature, so the very place and nature of the creature is nothing but this—to wait upon God and receive from Him what He alone can give, what He delights to give.” … If once our eyes are opened to this precious truth, all Nature will become a preacher, reminding us of the relationship which, founded in creation, is now taken up in grace”

Papa, I know my place in the scheme of things. I know Your place. Yet I so often put it all on me. I put all the weight on me to get the car through inspection. I put all the weight on me to help Barbara through these difficult health issues. O Lord, help me to wait on You who desires – nay delights to give us good things. May I be like that little bird with my mouth wide open to be filled!

Day 4 WAITING ON GOD: For Supplies

The Lord upholds all who are falling
and raises up all who are bowed down.
15 The eyes of all look to you,
and you give them their food in due season. Psalm 145:14-15

Summary of the Meditation

“What the universe and the animal creation does unconsciously, God’s people are to do intelligently and voluntarily. … He is to prove that there is nothing more noble or more blessed in the exercise of our free will than to use it in waiting upon God.”

Murray starts the meditation by encouraging us to pattern our waiting after the animal kingdom and an army. For the animal kingdom, we need to see God’s faithfulness.  Then, Murray uses the analogy of the army that doesn’t move forward until it is fully supplied. In the same way we are to not move forward until we have received the grace and strength we need to move forward.

Next he addresses how our praying should be shaped by waiting. He says that even when there is much praying, there is often very little waiting:

“In praying we are often occupied with ourselves, with our own needs, and our own efforts in the presentation of them. In waiting upon God, the first thought is of the God upon whom we wait. We enter His presence, and feel we need just to be quiet, so that He, as God, can overshadow us with Himself. God longs to reveal Himself, to fill us with Himself. Waiting on God gives Him time in His own way and divine power to come to us.”

How do we do it?

“Just be still before Him, and allow His Holy Spirit to waken and stir up in your soul the childlike disposition of absolute dependence and confident expectation.”

Jesus, show me where I am relying on my own broken cistern. My own supply.

Show me where there is much praying and very little waiting and then help me to wait.

Day 5 WAITING ON GOD: For Instruction

4 Make me to know your ways, O Lord;
teach me your paths.
Lead me in your truth and teach me,
for you are the God of my salvation;
for you I wait all the day long. Psalm 25:4-5

Summary of the Meditation

“I SPOKE of an army, on the point of entering an enemy’s territories, answering the question as to the cause of delay: ‘Waiting for supplies.’ The answer might also have been: ‘Waiting for instructions,’ or, ‘Waiting for orders.’”

Murray asserts that the need for instructions is as important as supplies for the army and to us.

“The writer [of Psalm 25] knew and loved God’s law exceedingly, and meditated in that law day and night. But he knew that this was not enough. He knew that for the right spiritual apprehension of the truth, and for the right personal application of it to his own peculiar circumstances, he needed a direct divine teaching.”

Cessassionists would disagree  and could just as easily say:

4 Make me to know your ways from Your written word, O Lord;
teach me your paths as I read the Scriptures.
Lead me in your truth and teach me from the Bible,

But Murray is clear that this instruction is to come directly from God.  And how does he say that it comes?

“And what is needed in us to receive this guidance? One thing: waiting for instructions,  waiting on God. ‘On Thee do I wait all the day.’  We want in our times of prayer to give clear expression to our sense of need, and our faith in His help. We want definitely to become conscious of our ignorance as to what God’s way may be, and the need of the Divine light shining within us…”

And the emphasis is on the “all the day.”

Lord, help me not just to wait on you in my quiet times. But all the day long. In all that I do. Not to become crippled in doing but empowered in my doing. And Lord, I need to hear directly from You. Be it through illumination by You from Your word or through others or through the still small voice of Your Spirit, I ask for You to speak.

Day 6 WAITING ON GOD: For all the saints

Indeed, none who wait for you shall be put to shame;
they shall be ashamed who are wantonly treacherous. Psalm 25:6 (ESV)

Summary of the Meditation

Murray asks us to turn our attention and prayers away from ourselves and towards all the saints who are waiting.  “how many there are, sick and weary and solitary, to whom it is as if their prayers are not answered, and who sometimes begin to fear that their hope will be put to shame. And then, how many servants of God, ministers or missionaries, teachers or workers, of various name, whose hopes in their work have been disappointed, and whose longing for power and blessing remains unsatisfied.” He tells us that this is a way to bear one another’s burden and so fulfill the law of Christ.

How do we do that? Murray teaches by example:

Blessed Father! we humbly beseech Thee, Let none that wait on Thee be ashamed; no, not one. Some are weary, and the time of waiting appears long. And some are feeble, and scarcely know how to wait. And some are so entangled in the effort of their prayers and their work, they think that they can find no time to wait continually. Father! teach us all how to wait. Teach us to think of each other, and pray for each other. Teach us to think of Thee, the God of all waiting ones. Father! let none that wait on Thee be ashamed. For Jesus’ sake. Amen.

Father, bring to mind those who are waiting for You. I seem to get caught up with just the few who are immediately in front of me. But I know there are many. Open my mind and my heart towards them. And may I pray for them.

Day 7 WAITING ON GOD: A Plea in Prayer

May integrity and uprightness preserve me,
for I wait for you. Psalm 25:21

Summary of the Meditation

Murray encourages us to hold to and claim this promise from Psalm 25 that we reflected on yesterday: “none who wait for you shall be put to shame.”

Then, based on this Psalm, Murray calls for something I cannot abide with:

If we draw near to God, it must be with a true heart. There must be perfect integrity, wholeheartedness, in our dealing with God. As we read in the next Psalm (26: 1, 11), ‘Judge me, O Lord, for I have walked in my integrity,’ ‘As for me, I will walk in my integrity,’ there must be perfect uprightness or single-heartedness before God. As it is written, ‘His righteousness is for the upright in heart.’ The soul must know that it allows nothing sinful, nothing doubtful; if it is indeed to meet the Holy One, and receive His full blessing, it must be with a heart wholly and singly given up to His will.

If to draw near to God requires: a true heart; perfect integrity; wholeheartedness; allow nothing sinful, nothing doubtful – we are all doomed. If God judges us by the integrity of our walk, there is no hope. He is taking David’s Old Covenant theology of works and law and proof-texting this idea. The scripture is clear – “there is none righteous, no not one” and “our righteousness is as filthy rags.” You cannot have both.

So what is going on in these Psalms? The more we draw near to God, the more we see our need to be like Him – to walk in integrity, to appropriate the imputed righteousness from Jesus’ finished work. And the more we appropriate that imputed righteousness, the more our heart longs to walk in that way.

Murray does acknowledge that our first attempts at walking in integrity may fail, but he strongly implies that it is possible. He turns these failures around  and sees them as a means of blessing that waiting brings about.

A soul cannot seek close fellowship with God, or attain the abiding consciousness of waiting on Him all the day, without a very honest and entire surrender to all His will.

So the blessing in our failures is the open door to honest and entire surrender to Him.

He encourages us to specify exactly what we are waiting for:

It is good that we sometimes count up to ourselves exactly what the things are we are waiting for, and as we say definitely of each of them, ‘On Thee do I wait,’ we shall be emboldened to claim the answer, ‘For on Thee do I wait.’

What will motivate our waiting and awaken our attention to wait on God?

It is the presence of a beloved or a dreaded master that wakens up the whole attention of the servant who waits on him. It is the presence of God, as He can in Christ by His Holy Spirit make Himself known, and keep the soul under its covering and shadow, that will awaken and strengthen the true waiting spirit.

Lord, as I spend time in Your presence, awaken my whole attention to expectant waiting.

Day 8 WAITING ON GOD: Strong and of Good Courage

13 I believe that I shall look upon the goodness of the Lord
in the land of the living!
14 Wait for the Lord;
be strong, and let your heart take courage;
wait for the Lord! Psalm 27:13-14

Summary of the Meditation

The Psalmist tells us that he would have fainted had it not been for his belief that he would see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Lord, we can grow weary (and faint) with all that is going on around us. But, do we really believe that we will see Your goodness? Do I really believe that I will see Your goodness in my family? In today’s troubles? Do I really believe that You will make a way for me in every situation I face – TODAY?

Am I waiting? Because that is the assurance of things hoped for. The evidence of things unseen. Do I believe that my quiet and confident waiting will be blessed and result in blessedness?  Do I have the courage to believe that God will hear and help? Murray tells us:

one of the deepest secrets of [waiting on God’s] blessedness and blessing, is a quiet, confident persuasion that it is not in vain; courage to believe that God will hear and help; that we are waiting on a God who never could disappoint His people. … Is waiting on God a work so difficult, that, for that too, such words are needed, ‘Be strong, and let your heart take courage’? Yes, indeed.  … The Psalmist says – Be strong and take courage. We normally think that applies to powerful and dangerous endeavors. But no! We must be strong and take courage just to wait!

Murray tells us we need to be strong and courageous to wait because we face:

    • Enemies before whom we are impotent
    • Spiritual needs which are basically unseen
    • Impossible tasks (for humans)
    • Supernatural realities totally foreign to us
    • The kind of relationship with God with which we are unaccustomed
    • A God who often appears to hide Himself

We who have to wait are often tempted to fear that we do not wait aright, that our faith is too feeble, that our desire is not as upright or as earnest as it should be, that our surrender is not complete. Our heart may well faint and fail.

Murray’s solution:

We ought to make up our minds to this, that nothing was ever so sure, as that waiting on God will bring us untold and unexpected blessing. … If you say that you are afraid of deceiving yourself with vain hope, because you do not see or feel any warrant in your present state for such special expectations, my answer is, it is God, who is the warrant for your expecting great things. … God’s love is just His delight to impart Himself and His blessedness to His children.

He gives us this analogy:

As a feeble, sickly invalid is brought out into the sunshine to let its warmth go through him, come with all that is dark and cold in you into the sunshine of God’s holy, omnipotent love, and sit and wait there, with the one thought: Here I am, in the sunshine of His love.

Lord, I need your strength and your courage to face what I am facing. You spoke to me last week that I don’t really believe that You “will make a way where there seems to be no way.” Then amazingly, you made a way in a situation where there seemed to be no way. May this time of waiting grow my faith and stamina; my strength and courage.

Day 9 WAITING ON GOD: With the Heart

Be strong, and let your heart take courage,
all you who wait for the Lord! Psalm 31:24

Summary of the Meditation

How do we wait on God? With our mind or our will? No, Murray says:

It is with the heart we must wait upon God. ‘Let your heart take courage.’ All our waiting depends upon the state of the heart.

Most of us, “know not how infinitely greater the heart is than the mind.”

People imagine that if they are occupied with the truth, the spiritual life will as a matter of course be strengthened. And this is by no means the case. … My mind is utterly impotent in creating or maintaining the spiritual life within me: the heart must wait on God for Him to work it in me.

Pastor Andre taught this morning that the Hebrew understanding of the heart includes the intellect.  Here are some quotes from  Pursue God :

    • In biblical Hebrew, the heart is where we feel feelings and think thoughts. In fact, ancient Israelites didn’t even have a word for “brain” that we know of. Jeremiah 15:16Proverbs 14:33
    • The heart is also where we make choices. So the concept of the “heart” is best understood as the “inner person” – the seat of our mind (thoughts), emotions (feelings), and will (intentions). Psalm 37:4Proverbs 4:23James 1:14-15

And another from Torah Apologetics:

So the heart is the seat of the mind, it deals with thoughts and intentions. Just as it is used the very first time in Gen. 6, describing the “intent of the heart” of man. It is not the seat of emotions.

So, with this understanding we need to better understand where Murray is going with this. Murray goes on to say that we cultivate the religion of the mind rather than the religion of the heart. He quotes Proverbs 3:5-6 about trusting with our heart and not leaning on our own understanding. He makes an analogy to the physical world. Our mind plans the food it needs to eat but it is the body’s other organs that obtain the nutrients. In the same way, our minds obtain the information about God’s ways and tell me what God’s word says. But it is with the heart that we believe.  In the same way:

And so the Christian needs ever, when he has studied or heard God’s word, to cease from his thoughts, to put no trust in them, and to awaken his heart to open itself before God, and seek the living fellowship with Him.

Here is how he says we are to do this:

I confess the impotence of all my thoughts and efforts, and set myself still to bow my heart before Him in holy silence, and to trust Him to renew and strengthen His own work in me.

Lord, I am not sure that I can discern the difference between waiting with my mind and my heart. Or my will and my heart. Based on the Hebrew meaning of heart, I am even more unsure. Teach me O Lord.

 Day 10 WAITING ON GOD: In Fear and Hope

18 Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear him,
on those who hope in his steadfast love,
19 that he may deliver their soul from death
and keep them alive in famine.

20 Our soul waits for the Lord;
he is our help and our shield.
21 For our heart is glad in him,
because we trust in his holy name.
22 Let your steadfast love, O Lord, be upon us,
even as we hope in you. Psalm 33:18-22

Summary of the Meditation

Where is our focus? What captures our attention? Murray tells us where God’s attention is pointed and where ours should be:

GOD’S eye is upon His people: their eye is upon Him. In waiting upon God, our eye, looking up to Him, meets His looking down upon us. This is the blessedness of waiting upon God, that it takes our eyes and thoughts away from ourselves, even our needs and desires, and occupies us with our God.

Next Murray points out the apparent contradiction in the Psalm in the Hebrew parallelism – Verse 18 is saying the same thing twice. Fearing God and Hoping in God are two things cut from the same cloth. Murray address this by showing us how many apparent contradictions there are in our understanding of God:

Fear and hope (vs 18) are generally thought to be in conflict with each other; in the presence and worship of God they are found side by side in perfect and beautiful harmony. And this because in God Himself all apparent contradictions are reconciled. Righteousness and peace, judgment and mercy, holiness and love, infinite power and infinite gentleness, a majesty that is exalted above all heaven, and a condescension that bows very low, meet and kiss each other.

Another way to say this is that all parallel lines that never meet in our world come together at  infinity. All apparent contradictions come together in the infinite heart of God.

How then, do we get to that point of waiting for Him in hope and fearing Him? It certainly helps to define what we mean by fearing God. Murray doesn’t give us a  definition. I have attempted it in my blog about The Fear of the Lord .  There I attempt to describe exactly how the Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Learning to work with electrical power requires a healthy fear and respect for its dangerous power. That is how it is the beginning of wisdom.  In that definition, Fear and Hope are not even apparent contradictions. Fear leads us to know the one we fear. And knowing God more, will give us more hope than we could ever imagine.

But I digress. Murray sees fear in the more traditional sense and he ties fear and hope together this way:

The lower we bow [because of our fear of Him], the deeper we feel we have nothing to hope in but His mercy. The lower we bow, the nearer God will come, and make our hearts bold to trust Him.

The Psalmist is realistic about the dangers in life:

19 that he may deliver their soul from death
and keep them alive in famine.”

But Murray and the Psalmist are clear:

Not to prevent the danger of death and famine— this is often needed to stir up to wait on Him— but to deliver and to keep alive.

The danger of death and famine are to stir up our need to wait on You Lord. Finally, Murray’s plea:

Children of God! will you not learn to sink down in entire helplessness and impotence, and in stillness to wait and see the salvation of God?

Father, continue to cultivate a healthy fear of You in me. You are an untamed lion.  And may that fear lead me to pursue You and in pursuing You, learn more about waiting on You.

Day 11 WAITING ON GOD: Patiently

Be still [Rest] before the Lord and wait patiently for him;
fret not yourself over the one who prospers in his way,
over the man who carries out evil devices!

Refrain from anger, and forsake wrath!
Fret not yourself; it tends only to evil.
For the evildoers shall be cut off,
but those who wait for the Lord shall inherit the land. Psalm 37:7-9

Summary of the Meditation

Do you want to cultivate a Christ-like character? Here are Murray’s thoughts:

And nowhere is there a better place for cultivating or displaying it than in waiting on God. There we discover how impatient we are, and what our impatience means.

We think we are impatient with circumstances and other people, but ultimately he says, we are impatient with Him. Waiting on God opens our eyes to His wise and sovereign will

And to [helps us to] see that the sooner and the more completely we yield absolutely to it, the more surely His blessing can come to us.

All the spiritual disciplines have great value. But they can go no farther than this, that they point the way and prepare us in humility to look to and to depend alone upon God Himself, and in patience to await His good time and mercy. The waiting is to teach us our absolute dependence upon God’s mighty working, and to make us in perfect patience place ourselves at His disposal.

How do we develop this patience?

It is resting in the Lord, in His will, His promise, His faithfulness, and His love, that makes patience easy. And the resting in Him is nothing but being silent unto Him, still before Him.

Finally, in our patiently waiting:

Seek not only the help, the gift, you need; seek Himself; wait for Him.

Papa, help me to see that all of my impatience is ultimately directed at You. Show me where I am impatient.  Help me to rest in You; in Your will and Your promises. Finally Lord, may I not seek you as a means to an end but as the end itself.

Day 12 WAITING ON GOD: Keeping His Way

Wait for the Lord and keep his way,
and he will exalt you to inherit the land;
you will look on when the wicked are cut off. Psalm 37:34

Summary of the Meditation

Murray shoots right over the bow right out of the gate: If we are not walking in His ways, we cannot expect to find Him. I fear that Murray is building too much from the Old Testament Psalms’ works ethic. How can we find Him when we are not born again – yet we do. Or as Paul says: He finds us. Then he states it in a different way: “We may be sure that God is never and nowhere to be found but in His ways.” Ah! I find God in the way He wants to reveal Himself.

He notes that the Psalm speaks of both the inner-life (“waiting”) and the outer-life (“keeping His ways”). Both are needed. And they need to be in “harmony.” The “inner [waiting] must be the inspiration and the strength for the outer.”

Here is a statement about God’s economy: “Do what God asks you to do; God will do more than you can ask Him to do.”

Murray also further refines his understanding of keeping His ways: “Give up your whole being to God without reserve and without doubt; He will prove Himself God to you, and work in you that which is pleasing in His sight through Jesus Christ.”

Here are ways he suggests that we can keep His ways:

    • As you know them in the Word
    • As you have learned them from nature
    • As they are providentially pointed out
    • As directed by the Holy Spirit

Unlike a works mentality, Murray concludes by saying that as we are content to receive all that God has in store for us: “’Wait on the Lord, and keep His ways’ will be command and promise in one.”

Papa, I know that I fall short in many ways – not just outwardly but inwardly in my waiting. Yet You remain faithful.  Thank You for teaching me Your ways.  I am so grateful that You allow me to find You even after I have strayed. Your mercy never fails.

Day 13 WAITING ON GOD: For more than we know

“And now, O Lord, for what do I wait?
My hope is in you.
Deliver me from all my transgressions.
Do not make me the scorn of the fool! Psalm 39:7-8

Summary of the Meditation

Do you ever reach the point in your waiting on God that you think: “What do I really want Him to do? What exactly am I waiting on Him for?” Although this may feel disorienting, Murray actually thinks it is a good place to be in our waiting.

God is able to do for us exceeding abundantly above what we ask or think, and we are in danger of limiting Him, when we confine our desires and prayers to our own thoughts of them.

When the Israelites were in the wilderness, they doubted that God could set a table in the wilderness.

Yes. God had done it: He could do it again. But when the thought came of God doing something new, they limited Him; their expectation could not rise beyond their past experience, or their own thoughts of what was possible.

Are we only waiting on a repeat performance or are we waiting for a world premier?

Let us believe that every promise of God we plead has a divine meaning, infinitely beyond our thoughts of them. … let us therefore cultivate the habit of waiting on God, not only for what we think we need, but for all His grace and power are ready to do for us. In every true prayer there are two hearts in exercise. The one is your heart, with its little, dark, human thoughts of what you need and God can do. The other is God’s great heart, with its infinite, its divine purpose of blessing.

Murray believes that seeing the feebleness of our requests and the little dark heart we have and God’s gigantic heart “is what waiting on God is meant to teach you. …Wait on God to do for you more than you can ask or think.”

May it not be that you have had your own thoughts about the way or the extent of God’s doing it, and have never waited on the God of glory, according to the riches of His glory, to do for you what has not entered the heart of man to conceive? … you hardly know what you have to expect. I pray you, be of good courage— this ignorance is often one of the best signs.

In “The Weight of Glory,” C.S. Lewis said:

“It would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.”

Papa, show me the littleness of my expectations. Show me where my desires are too weak. I see that in me. Show me where my waiting is not the expectant waiting that You deserve. Show me how I am content with trifles and You want to give me Yourself. Where am I limiting You and what You can do in my waiting?

Day 14 WAITING ON GOD:  The Way to the New Song

I waited patiently for the Lord;
he inclined to me and heard my cry.
He drew me up from the pit of destruction,
out of the miry bog,
and set my feet upon a rock,
making my steps secure.
He put a new song in my mouth,
a song of praise to our God.
Many will see and fear,
and put their trust in the Lord. Psalm 40:1-3

Summary of the Meditation

This meditation has more to do with Patience than a new song. Murray sees patience as:

    • foreign to our self-confident nature
    • indispensable in our waiting upon God
    • an essential element of true faith

What is patience. In the English:

The word patience is derived from the Latin word for suffering. It suggests the thought of being under the constraint of some power from which we want to be free.

In waiting on God it is of infinite consequence that we not only submit, because we are compelled to, but because we lovingly and joyfully consent to be in the hands of our blessed Father.

Here are some more of Murray’s insights on Patience.  It:

    • Is our highest blessedness
    • Is our highest grace
    • Honors God
    • Gives Him time to have His way with us
    • Is the highest expression of our faith in His goodness and faithfulness.
    • Brings the soul perfect rest in the assurance that God is carrying on His work.
    • Is the token of our full consent that God should deal with us in such a way and time as He thinks best.
    • Is our losing our self-will

Again, more about patience. It is:

    • The great stillness of soul before God that sinks into its own helplessness and waits for Him to reveal Himself;
    • The deep humility that is afraid to let its own will or its own strength work aught except as God works to will and to do;
    • The meekness that is content to be and to know nothing except as God gives His light;
    • The entire resignation of the will that only wants to be a vessel in which His holy will can move and mold
    • A grace

All these elements of perfect patience are not found at once.

if we are to wait on God in all patience: we need to be strengthened with all God’s might, and that according to the measure of His glorious power. … it is in the course of our feeble and very imperfect waiting that God Himself by His hidden power strengthens us and works out in us the patience of the saints, the patience of Christ Himself. …Patient waiting upon God brings a rich reward; the deliverance is sure; God Himself will put a new song into your mouth. … [If] you sometimes feel as if patience is not your gift, then remember it is God’s gift, and take that prayer (2 Thess. 3: 5 R.V.): ‘The Lord direct your hearts into the patience of Christ.’

Lord, You were patient in Your waiting for Your mission to be carried out. But You waited – when Your time was not yet at hand. Help me to learn to wait patiently. And then put a new song in my heart whereby I may sing Your praises.

Day 15 WAITING ON GOD: For His Counsel

But they soon forgot his works;
they did not wait for his counsel. Psalm 106 :13

Summary of the Meditation

Murray opens this meditation by remembering the three times the Israelites failed in Canaan during the time of Joshua: Going up against AI; making a covenant with the Gibeonites; and settling rather than taking the whole inheritance. All three were because they did not wait for his counsel. We are all in danger of this. Hearing God’s word, but then doing it our own way without waiting for God’s counsel.

Our whole relation to God is rooted in this, that His will is to be done in us and by us as it is in heaven. He has promised to make known His will to us by His Spirit, the Guide into all truth. And our position is to be that of waiting for His counsel, as the only guide of our thoughts and actions. In our church worship, in our prayer-meetings, in our conventions, in all our gatherings as managers, or directors, or committees, or helpers in any part of the work for God, our first object ought ever to be to ascertain the mind of God.

Ah! But how to do that? So little is written on learning to listen to God together.

I will let Andrew pour his heart to us on this issue of our need to learn to hear God together:

The great danger in all such assemblies is that in our consciousness of having our Bible, and our past experience of God’s leading, and our sound creed, and our honest wish to do God’s will, we trust in these, and do not realize that with every step we need and may have a heavenly guidance. There may be elements of God’s will, applications of God’s word, experiences of the close presence and leading of God, manifestations of the power of His Spirit, of which we know nothing as yet. God may be willing,

God is willing to open up these to the souls who are intently set upon allowing Him to have His way entirely, and who are willing in patience to wait for His making it known. When we come together praising God for all He has done and taught and given, we may at the same time be limiting Him by not expecting greater things.

A minister has no more solemn duty than teaching people to wait upon God.

More stillness of soul to realize God’s presence; more consciousness of ignorance of what God’s great plans may be; more faith in the certainty that God has greater things to show us; more longing that He Himself may be revealed in new glory: these must be the marks of the assemblies of God’s saints, if they would avoid the reproach, ‘They waited not for His counsel.’

Father, I don’t understand why this is not more well understood. Give me insight and help me to lead where You are leading on this issue.

Day 16 WAITING ON GOD: For His Light in the Heart.

I wait for the Lord, my soul waits,
and in his word I hope;
my soul waits for the Lord
more than watchmen for the morning,
more than watchmen for the morning. Psalm 130:5-6

 Summary of the Meditation

Who is it that waits for the morning light? Those in darkness. The watchman protecting the city waiting for a clearer view of the enemy. The shipwrecked sailor.  Murray tells us:

Our waiting on God can have no higher object than simply having His light shine on us, and in us, and through us, all the day.

What is that light? Murray answers:

‘The light of the glory of God, in the face of Jesus Christ.’ … Our heart is meant to have that light filling and gladdening it all the day. …But can we indeed enjoy it all the day? We can.

And how do we enjoy the light of God’s glory all day? Murray says that it is analogous to the flora and fauna. What do they do to enjoy the light of the sun?

They do nothing; they simply bask in the sunshine… The only difference between nature and grace is this, that what the trees and the flowers do unconsciously, as they drink in the blessing of the light, is to be with us a voluntary and a loving acceptance. Faith, simple faith in God’s word and love, is to be the opening of the eyes, the opening of the heart, to receive and enjoy the unspeakable glory of His grace.

Sometimes, the light reveals the pain of sin within. He continues:

The first beginnings of light may be just enough to discover the darkness, and painfully to humble you on account of sin. Can you not trust the light to expel the darkness? Do believe it will. Just bow, even now, in stillness before God, and wait on Him to shine into you. Say, in humble faith; God is light, infinitely brighter and more beautiful than that of the sun. God is light. The Father, the eternal, inaccessible, and incomprehensible light.

And this light is something we can trust.

What would I think of a sun that could not shine? what shall I think of a God that does not shine? No, God shines!

Shine your light upon me this day. May I walk in the light of Your love and grace all the day long.

Day 17 WAITING ON GO: In Times of Darkness

Isaiah 8:17 17 I will wait for the Lord, who is hiding his face from the house of Jacob, and I will hope in him.

Summary of the Meditation

The questions that this meditation begs is: Does God really hide his face? When we have the 24/7 Holy Spirit, is it possible to hide His face? What does it mean when we say “God is hiding his face.” Is His face the same as His presence? In human relations we can be present but not looking at each other face to face. Is that what is going on? Jesus had the Holy Spirit and yet the face of God was hidden. But isn’t that a different situation when the sin of the whole world is laid upon Jesus?

Murray seems to take a different approach and doesn’t directly answer the question. . He picks up from the Scripture that the Prophet is waiting on God who is hiding His face from Israel. And from the context, the people of Israel were in rebellion during Isaiah’s day. He says that we should use our access to God to intercede for “our less favored brethren.” Those who are less favored according to Murray:

    • Have little joy or spiritual life in the preaching and fellowship
    • Are in much error and worldliness
    • Seek after human wisdom and counsel
    • Trust in ordinances and observances
    • Have little power for conversion or edification
    • Have little of the Spirit working in their midst
    • Trust too much in men and money
    • Have too much formality and self-indulgence
    • Have too little faith and prayer
    • Have too little love and humility
    • Have too little of the spirit of the crucified Jesus
    • Have nominal profession

These are those with whom God is hiding His face. So Murray doesn’t really answer the question except by saying the ones from whom God is hiding His face are those who are hiding their face from Him. And his call to us is to intercede and wait on God for these less favored brethren.

There is a strong emphasis in this meditation, for us to be waiting on God for those who are in all kinds of error or who are lukewarm.  Clearly the people of Israel during Isaiah’s time were in great darkness.

Papa, who is walking in darkness right now that I need to be waiting on You for? With whom and for whom, can I be waiting on You?

Day 18 WAITING ON GOD: To Reveal Himself

It will be said on that day,
“Behold, this is our God; we have waited for him, that he might save us.
This is the Lord; we have waited for him;
let us be glad and rejoice in his salvation.” Isaiah 25:9

Summary of the Meditation

Murray identifies two precious thoughts in the words of the prophet Isaiah:

    • Revealing language from God’s people who are united in their waiting on Him
    • The blessing of united waiting on God is that God reveals Himself

He identifies (again) the things that are hindering our united waiting:

    • There are evils in the church to which no human wisdom is equal
    • Ritualism, rationalism, formalism, and worldliness are robbing the church of its power
    • Culture, money and pleasure are threatening our spiritual life
    • Infidelity, iniquity, and wretchedness appear more powerful than we can cope with.

But he tells us that promises of God and the power of the Holy Spirit are more than enough to meet these challenges if we will but wait on Him for them. What does united waiting on God look like for God’s people? The same as it does with an individual. It would mean developing and having:

    • A deeper conviction that God must and will do all
    • A more humble and abiding entrance into our deep helplessness
    • Entire and unceasing dependence upon Him.
    • A more living consciousness that the essential thing is, giving God His place of honor and of power;
    • A confident expectation that God will, by His Spirit, give the secret of His acceptance and presence and at the right time, a revelation of His saving power

What would be the aim of this united waiting on Him

    • It would bring everyone there under a deep sense of God’s presence
    • It would mean that everyone would leave with a sure knowledge that they have met with God Himself
    • They would leave knowing that they have left everything in His hands and that now is a time of waiting

What can leadership do to usher us into God’s presence:

“The godly minister has no more difficult, no more solemn, no more blessed task, than to lead his people out to meet God, and, before ever he preaches, to bring each one into contact with Him.”

Waiting before God, and  waiting on God, are the one condition of God showing His presence.

He pictures it working as follows:

A company of believers gathered with the one purpose, helping each other by little intervals of silence, to wait on God alone, opening the heart for whatever God may have of new discoveries of evil, of His will, of new openings in work or methods of work, would soon have reason to say, ‘ Lo, this is our God; we have waited for Him, He shall save us: this is the Lord ; we have waited for Him, we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation.’ ‘My soul, wait thou only upon God!’

Make us at our church such a people who wait on You in a united fashion.

Day 19 WAITING ON GOD: As a God of Judgement

‘Yea, in the way of Thy judgments, O Lord, have we waited for Thee: . . . for when Thy judgments are on the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness.’—Isa. 26:8,9.

‘The Lord is a God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for Him.’—Isa. 30:18.

Summary of the Meditation

Andrew begins by showing how God is a God of both mercy and judgment – exhibited by the Exodus; the flood; the expelling of the Canaanites and others. Judgement punishes sin; mercy saves the sinner. His point is that as we wait on God, His holy presence will stir up and discover hidden sin, bring us very low as we see the sinful nature within, our heart’s true opposition to God’s ways and our inability to walk in them.  He tells us not to be surprised as we begin to wait on Him because we will only discover more of our otherness from God.  “Wait on God, in the faith that His tender mercy is working out in you His redemption in the midst of judgment: wait for Him, He will be gracious to thee.”

There is a second and more solemn thought he brings up. As we experience the judgements of God, we are to realize that there are thousands of our brethren who will face this judgment. Are we not to warn them?

He doesn’t explicitly pick up on how we learn righteousness when God’s judgments are on the earth.

Finally, the meditation would read in a very different way if we took the Hebrew definition for the word judgments מִשְׁפָט mishpat as “the act of deciding a case” or the “process, procedure, and litigation before judges.”  We should be waiting on the completion of the trial when the case is decided – justice poured out. Murray takes the traditional approach to God’s judgements – his revealing of and punishment for our sins. But “waiting for His judgements” is more accurately seen as Isaiah waiting for God to bring justice. That casts a different light on the text for this morning.

Lord, I am waiting on You to set all things right. For bringing justice to this world. I long for justice in the wrongs done to me by my friends. I know that I wait with others for justice – especially in the persecuted church. May this waiting open my eyes to You and Your ways.

Day 20 WAITING ON GOD: Who waits on us

‘And therefore will the Lord wait, that He may be gracious unto you; and therefore will He be exalted, that He may have mercy upon you: for the Lord is a God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for Him.’—Isa. 30:18

Summary of the Meditation

God waits for us more than we wait for Him. Let that sink down into our very marrow. Andrew claims that:

The vision of Him waiting on us, will give new impulse and inspiration to our waiting upon Him. It will give an unspeakable confidence that our waiting cannot be in vain. If He waits for us, then we may be sure that we are more than welcome; that He rejoices to find those He has been seeking for.

And what does God’s waiting look like? Murray says the best comparison is that of a Father waiting for his child to come to him; to come back home. “He waits with all of the longings of a father’s heart.” And how does that help us? Murray tells us:

“Yes, connect every exercise, every breath of the life of waiting, with faith’s vision of your God waiting for you.”

But wait! How can He be waiting for me when I have been waiting so long for Him? Murray tells us:

“you ask, how is it, if He waits to be gracious, that even after I come and wait upon Him, He does not give the help I seek, but waits on longer and longer?”

Two answers:

    • God is a wise husbandman, ‘who waits for the precious fruit of the earth, and has long patience for it.’ He cannot gather the fruit until it is ripe. He knows when we are ready. … God waited four thousand years, until the fullness of time, before He sent His Son: our times are in His hands: He will avenge His elect speedily: He will make haste for our help, and not delay one hour too long.
    • God is more than the blessing; and our being kept waiting on Him is the only way for us to learn to find our life and joy in Himself.

Murray describes us as ladies-in-waiting for the Queen. What a privilege! What joy in serving the sovereign!

Finally, how blessed it is when the waiting God meets with His waiting servant!

So brothers and sisters: “let waiting be our work, as it is His.”

Papa, I need to recognize that You have been waiting on me for a long time. In what ways are you  waiting on me today?

Day 21 WAITING ON GOD: The Almighty One

They that wait on the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with eagle wings; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint.’—Isa. 40: 31.

Summary of the Meditation

Murray starts with a great insight.

Waiting always partakes of the character of our thoughts of the one on whom we wait.

In other words, what we think about God will shape the way we wait. Is God a cruel taskmaster? We will wait for the other shoe to drop. Do we think of Him as capricious? Then we will wait not knowing what to expect this time. And so on. But oh what a God we wait on. Faithful, true and merciful.

This is the fertile ground out of which springs this much quoted verse from Isaiah.  God is the Almighty and Everlasting one. And because Isaiah saw God in this way, he saw how waiting on Him will produce strength and endurance.

Where does the eagle soar? In the highest heavens. We are meant to live in As the eagle stirs up its nest...the heavenlies. Seated with God. “You are born of God. You have the eagles’ wings. You may not have known it: you may not have used them; but God can and will teach you to use them.”

We are taught to use our eagle wings in the same way an eaglet learns.

He stirs up your nest. He disappoints your hopes. He brings down your confidence. He makes you fear and tremble, as all your strength fails, and you feel utterly weary and helpless. And all the while He is spreading His strong wings for you to rest your weakness on, and offering His everlasting Creator-strength to work in you. And all He asks is that you should sink down in your weariness and wait on Him; and allow Him in His Jehovah-strength to carry you as you ride upon the wings of His Omnipotence.

Papa, Everlasting and Almighty one. Stir up my nest until I learn to wait on You. Reveal my disappointed hopes. Where am I confident in myself? Lord, what would it look like today for me to ride upon Your wings?

Day 22 WAITING ON GOD: It’s Certainty of Blessing

‘Thou shalt know that I am the Lord; for they shall not be ashamed that wait for Me.’ —Isa. 49:23.

‘Blessed are all they that wait for Him.’ —Isa. 30:18.

Summary of the Meditation

Murray chides and challenges us with the fact that we are so slow of learning “that this blessed waiting must and can be as the very breath of our life, a continuous resting in God’s presence and His love, an unceasing yielding of ourselves for Him to perfect His work in us.” And with that slowness is also fear – fear that it may not be true.  “Let us listen to God’s answer, until every fear is banished, and we send back to heaven the words God speaks, Yes, Lord, we believe what You say: ‘All they that wait for Me shall not be ashamed.’ ‘Blessed are all they that wait for Him.’”

Both of these passages in Isaiah point to a time in history when God’s people were in dire straits and there was no possible way out. Do we believe God’s word to them for our situation. No disappointment is possible!  If all we had was a vague sense that God was going to deliver us, we would despair. But we have God’s promises. And we need to “wait before Him, until He Himself reveals to us what His promises mean, and in the promises reveals Himself in His hidden glory!” Let’s not let the depth of the meaning of these promises pass us by. And God Himself comes with all of these promises. In the midst of our deepest trouble, a simple word directly from God can calm the storm. “Peace! Be still my son [or daughter].” That is enough to stop the raging sea within.

What place does waiting have in our personal life? The measure of its faith or power is not because we have beautiful visions of what God can do or even that we speak eloquently of it. “No; it is what we really know of God in our personal experience, conquering the enemies within, reigning and ruling, revealing Himself in His Holiness and Power in our inmost being.”  And the blessing is present even while we wait. Because what we have is Him even while we wait for the fulfillment of what we are waiting for.

“the Everlasting God meets, in the greatness and the tenderness of His love, each waiting child, to shine in his heart ‘the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.’ Read these words again, until your heart learns to know what God waits to do”

Father, help me to reflect upon our history together. You have conquered enemies within and have ruled and reigned in my life. You have revealed Yourself in my inmost being. Thank you that You come with all of Your promises.

Day 23 WAITING ON GOD: For Unlooked for Things

‘For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside Thee, what He hath prepared for him that waiteth for Him.’—Isa. 64:4.

From of old no one has heard
or perceived by the ear,
no eye has seen a God besides you,
who acts for those who wait for him. ESV

“What no eye has seen, nor ear heard,
nor the heart of man imagined,
what God has prepared for those who love him”— 1 Corinthians 2:9

From of old we have not heard, neither have our eyes seen a God beside thee, and thy works which thou wilt perform to them that wait for mercy. Brenton’s LXX

Summary of the Meditation

Murray highlights the difference between the RV and AV translations. The RV (and ESV)  – no one has seen a God that works; The AV (and Paul in 1st Corinthians) – no one has seen the work God will do. Although he chooses the AV to concentrate on, he tells us that they both tell us that if we wait, things (God – RV/ESV or God’s hand – AV) will be revealed to us that we cannot conceive. (Notice that the LXX has both!).

My bigger question (since I think the work of God and God Himself are pretty inseparable and so the difference makes no difference) why does Paul use love Him vs waits for Him? This amazing revelation comes to those who wait – or those who love Him. Andrew doesn’t address this at all. I think it might be saying – to wait on Him is to love Him.

Murray concentrates this meditation on that God alone knows what He can do for His waiting people.  He points us to the preceding verses in Isaiah as to how desperate the situation was. And God knows we need this kind of revelation in the church. Murray says – look at the church. We do His work using our wisdom; we demonstrate little of the Spirit’s power in what we do; we don’t manifest the unity that will draw people to Himself; how little we demonstrate the holiness God calls for; and how little the world sees of men and women in Christ and Christ in them.

How can we reverse this sad state in the church and in our hearts. You guessed it. Waiting on God. And what should we wait for?  “We must desire and believe, we must ask and expect, that God will do unlooked-for things. We must set our faith on a God of whom men do not know what He has prepared for them that wait for Him. The wonder-doing God, who can surpass all our expectations, must be the God of our confidence.” And if we take Paul’s version of this quote, these things have been revealed by the Spirit.

Lord, I know my vision of what you can do and what you will do and what you have done is very limited. Reveal to me your heart.

Day 24 WAITING ON GOD: To Know His Goodness.

‘The Lord is good unto them that wait for Him.’ — Lam. 3: 25

Summary of the Meditation

Murray tells us that our first entry into waiting on God is usually waiting for him to bless us with some answer to prayer. But, he says:

God graciously uses our need and desire for help to educate us for something higher than we were thinking of. We were seeking gifts; He, the Giver, longs to give Himself and to satisfy the soul with His goodness. It is just for this reason that He often withholds the gifts, and that the time of waiting is made so long. He is all the time seeking to win the heart of His child for Himself. He wishes that we should not only say, when He bestows the gift, How good is God! but that long ere it comes, and even if it never comes, we should all the time be experiencing: ‘It is good that a man should quietly wait’: ‘The Lord is good to them that wait for Him.’

He encourages us to make waiting on God a habit, a disposition, second-nature, the very breath of our soul, the very root of our life with God.  Our knowledge, understanding and experience of God’s goodness will grow as we grow in our waiting on God.

Lord, it is hard for me to imagine me growing in knowledge and understanding of Your goodness. You by very definition are good. But I can see growing in my experience of Your goodness and growing in my waiting on You. I will watch to see how the others grow beyond what I imagine as I pursue growth in waiting on You.

Day 25 WAITING ON GOD: Quietly.

‘It is good that a man should both hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the Lord.’— Lam 3:26

Summary of the Meditation

‘TAKE heed, and be quiet: fear not, neither be faint-hearted.’  (Isaiah 7:4)

‘In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength.’ (Isaiah 30:15)

‘The Lord is in His holy temple; let all the earth keep silence before Him’ (Hab. 2: 20).

‘Hold thy peace at the presence of the Lord God.’ (Zeph. 1: 7).

‘Be silent, O all flesh, before the Lord; for He is raised up out of His holy habitation’ (Zech. 2: 13).

Murray tells us that these scriptures show us the “deep connection between quietness and faith, and show us what a deep need there is of quietness, as an element of true waiting upon God.”

Why the deep need and deep connection? Murray says that our nature is so estranged from this infinite being, “that it needs our whole heart and desires set upon Him, even in some little measure to know and receive Him.”

Murray tells us what can keep us from this quiet waiting:

As long as the waiting on God is chiefly regarded as an end towards more effectual prayer, and the obtaining of our petitions, this spirit of perfect quietness will not be obtained. But when it is seen that the waiting on God is itself an unspeakable blessedness, one of the highest forms of fellowship with the Holy One, the adoration of Him in His glory will of necessity humble the soul into a holy stillness, making way for God to speak and reveal Himself.

Let everyone who would learn the art of waiting on God remember the lesson:  ‘Take heed, and be quiet;’ ‘It is good that a man quietly wait.’ Take time to be separate from all friends and all duties, all cares and all joys; time to be still and quiet before God. Take time not only to secure stillness from man and the world, but from self and its energy.  Let the Word and prayer be very precious; but remember, even these may hinder the quiet waiting.

How can we be quiet in the midst of the cacophony of sound around us?  Habit and discipline: “Though at first it may appear difficult to know how thus quietly to wait, with the activities of mind and heart for a time subdued, every effort after it will be rewarded; we shall find that it grows upon us, and the little season of silent worship will bring a peace and a rest that give a blessing not only in prayer, but all the day.”

Lord, the promise seems too great. Just do it and the blessing will flow. Humble my soul into silence before You. Show me today what is keeping me from waiting in silence before you.

Day 26 WAITING ON GOD: In Holy Expectancy.

‘Therefore will I look to the Lord; I will wait for the God of my salvation; my God will hear me.’— Micah 7: 7.

Summary of the Meditation

The essence of this meditation is that we must wait with holy expectancy. My God will hear me. Murray says that: “A holy, joyful expectancy is of the very essence of true waiting.” He starts by summarizing a little book called “Expectation Corner.” That book illustrates the truth from James’ letter: We have not because we ask not – and when we ask, we are not continuously looking for the answer to arrive.

When we have been given a promise of God, we must wait with “confident assurance” that my God will hear me. He digresses from this a bit when he tells us of the great promise that should be central to all prayer petitions: “the one great petition which ought to be the chief thing every heart seeks for itself — that The Life of God in the soul may have full sway; that Christ may be fully formed within; and that we may be filled to all the fullness of God.” This Murray says is what we ought “to seek and dare to expect.”

He closes with a thought about stillness in our waiting. As we unite ourselves in the death of Jesus, we become still – because “there is no stillness like that of the grave.” “As we cease from self, and our soul becomes still to God, God will arise and show Himself.”

Lord, I often wonder how dead to self I really am. How united with You, Jesus I am? Is it really “not I who live but Christ who lives in me?” Father have your way in my heart and soul that I may rest expectantly waiting for the fulfillment of your promises to me.  Especially the promise to be fully formed in me and to be filled to all the fullness of God. Amen.

Day 27 WAITING ON GOD: For Redemption.

‘Simeon was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Ghost was upon him. Anna, a prophetess, . . . spake of Him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.’— Luke 2: 25, 38.

Summary of the Meditation

Murray concentrates this devotion on the waiting on God that was done by believers in the Old Testament. They were waiting for consolation and redemption – what has already been accomplished in Jesus. So he asks – do we still need to wait? Yes he says – for two reasons: “But will not our waiting, who look back to it as come, differ greatly from those who looked forward to it as coming? It will, especially in two aspects. We now wait on God in the full power of the redemption: and we wait for its full revelation.”

    1. Waiting in the full power of redemption. We know that the redemption was accomplished and our position secured. We are in Christ and Christ is in us. “Our waiting on God may now be in the wonderful consciousness, wrought and maintained by the Holy Spirit within us, that we are accepted in the Beloved, that the love that rests on Him rests on us, that we are living in that love, in the very nearness and presence and sight of God.”
    2. We are waiting for the full revelation of this redemption. “As we maintain our place in Christ day by day, God waits to reveal Christ in us, in such a way that He is formed in us, that His mind and disposition and likeness acquire form and substance in us, so that by each it can in truth be said, ‘Christ liveth in me.’”

He makes a distinction that I have never considered: Our life “in Christ” is in heaven and Christ in us is on earth. I had never thought of it that way. And they are meant to complement each other. He puts it this way:

the more my waiting on God is marked by the living faith that I am in Christ, the more the heart thirsts for and claims the CHRIST IN ME. … And the waiting on God, which began with special needs and prayer, will increasingly be concentrated, as far as our personal life is concerned, on this one thing, Lord, reveal Your redemption fully in me; let Christ live in me.

He lists two other differences between Old Testament waiting and the New:

    • The place we take (seated in the heavenlies)
    • The expectations we entertain

One last point he makes:

Learn from Simeon and Anna one lesson. How utterly impossible it was for them to do anything towards the great redemption — towards the birth of Christ or His death. It was God’s work. They could do nothing but wait.

And so it is impossible for us to make the revelation of Jesus in us a reality. We are helpless and feeble in making the revelation happen. But, he concludes this meditation:

As gloriously as God proved Himself to them the faithful and wonder-working God, He will to us also.

Jesus, teach me more about the distinction between You in me (on earth) and me in You (in heaven). Reveal more to me the distinction between the waiting Anna and Simeon did and my waiting which has the full power of the redemption present here and now. I hear what he says about how our waiting for answers and deliverance becomes transformed into waiting for You – work that in me O Lord.

Day 28 WAITING ON GOD: For the Coming of His Son

‘Be ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their Lord.’— Luke 12: 36

‘Until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which, in His own time, He shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords.’— 1 Tim. 6: 14,15( R.V.).

‘Turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God, and to wait for His Son from heaven.’— 1 Thess. 1: 9, 10.

 Summary of the Meditation

The opening Scripture is from Jesus’ brief exchange about the Master of the house who is coming back from a wedding. So, for Murray [and Jesus], we are to be like those waiting for their Master to return from a celebration and be alert and watch carefully for his return. Murray says that waiting on God in heaven is joined by God with waiting for the return of His Son. “The present life and the coming  glory are inseparably connected.” Learning to wait on God for His power and promise is a preparation for waiting for Jesus’ return. He warns us against the danger of separating them.

It is always easier to be engaged with the religion of the past or the future than to be faithful in the religion of today. As we look to what God has done in the past, or will do in time to come, the personal claim of present duty and present submission to His working may be escaped. … There is such a danger of our being so occupied with the things that are coming more than with Him who is to come; there is such scope in the study of coming events for imagination and reason and human ingenuity, that nothing but deeply humble waiting on God can save us from mistaking the interest and pleasure of intellectual study for the true love of Him and His appearing.

Waiting for Christ Himself is, oh, so different from waiting for things that may come to pass! The latter any Christian can do; the former, God must work in you every day by His Holy Spirit.

He warns against concentrating on one “waiting” for the other. Those that are waiting on God should not neglect waiting for Jesus’ return and those waiting for Jesus’ return should also be waiting on God.

Waiting on God must ever lead to waiting for Christ as the glorious consummation of His work; and waiting for Christ must ever remind us of the duty of waiting upon God, … The hope of that glorious appearing will strengthen you in waiting upon God for what He is to do in you now.

And as I quoted earlier, waiting in the now will prepare you for waiting for His coming. He ends the meditation on a separate topic – the bridal spirit.

Tender love to Him and tender love to each other is the true and only bridal spirit. … It is not when we are most occupied with prophetic subjects, but when in humility and love we are clinging close to our Lord and His brethren, that we are in the bride’s place. Jesus refuses to accept our love except as it is love to His disciples. … Those who love most are the most ready for His coming.

Jesus, this is a new concept: tying waiting on God and waiting for You to return. Reveal more to me about this over the next week. Also, I am challenged by the call to the bridal spirit – where I love Your disciples as much as I love You. Show me how I can do that.

Day 29 WAITING ON GOD: For the Promise of the Father.

‘He charged them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father.’— Acts 1: 4.

Summary of the Meditation

Murray is telling us that just as the first disciples had to wait in Jerusalem until they were endued with power, so we need to wait continually. He shows us how this waiting and subsequent infilling happened several times to the same disciples. So we need to wait for this continual infilling of the Spirit.

In one sense, the fulfillment can never come again as it came at Pentecost. In another sense, and that in as deep reality as with the first disciples, we daily need to wait for the Father to fulfil His promise in us.

He also provides us some of his pneumatology – his doctrine of the Holy Spirit:

    • The Holy Spirit is not a person distinct from the Father in the way two persons on earth are distinct.
    • The Father and the Spirit are never without or separate from each other: the Father is always in the Spirit;
    • The Spirit works nothing but as the Father works in Him.
    • Each moment the same Spirit that is in us, is in God too
    • The Spirit in us is not a power at our disposal.
    • Nor is the Spirit an independent power, acting apart from the Father and the Son.
    • The Spirit is the real living presence and the power of the Father working in us
    • The Spirit given at Pentecost was not a something that God parted with in heaven, and sent away out of heaven to earth. God does not, cannot, give away anything in that way.

Finally, he ties this back to waiting: “he who is most full of the Spirit will be the first to wait on God most earnestly, further to fulfil His promise, and still strengthen him mightily by His Spirit in the inner man.”

Father, Jesus, Holy Spirit! Any attempt to define one member of the trinity apart from the other creates confusion in my mind. Open my mind and my heart to the incredible beauty of the Trinity.

Day 30 WAITING ON GOD: Continually

‘Therefore turn thou to thy God: keep mercy and judgment, and wait on thy God continually.’— Hos. 12: 6.

Summary of the Meditation

Just as continuity is critical to life, continuity in our waiting on God is critical to life in the Spirit. We are to learn to wait on Him continually. Murray recognizes that there are special times of waiting, but “the maintenance of the spirit of entire dependence must be continuous.” And thus, for all who want everything there is from God, we must learn to wait continually.

Murray encourages us by saying that this is possible. Whatever your heart is full of will occupy it. “When the heart has learned how entirely powerless it is for one moment to keep itself or bring forth any good, when it has understood how surely and truly God will keep it, when it has, in despair of itself, accepted God’s promise to do for it the impossible, it learns to rest in God, and in the midst of occupations and temptations it can wait continually.”

He encourages us to not worry about starting imperfectly. There will be frequent intermissions and failures. But he encourages us to believe that God is superintending the process. Waiting is not fruitless. Even while we wait in darkness. God is working behind the scenes in them. “Waiting continually will be met and rewarded by God Himself working continually.” And no quid pro quo. Not: “If I wait continually, God will work continually.” No! Since God is working continually in my life, I will wait continually upon Him. “Take time until the vision of your God working continually, without one moment’s intermission, fill your being. Your waiting continually will then come of itself.”

Father, work in me this “waiting as a life style.” Lord, what is the first step I can take to grow in this?

Day 31 WAITING ON GOD: Only

‘My soul, wait thou only upon God;  For my expectation is from Him. He only

is my rock and my salvation.’— Isa. 62: 5,6.

 Summary of the Meditation

How fitting to end this series of meditations with the one word: only. How often we have other preoccupations and distractions? I certainly do. Murray tells us that we won’t find many companions with us on this journey.

On a side note, Murray brings up the topic of the bronze serpent. It is an odd enough story from the book of Numbers where this statue on a pole is erected under God’s instruction for all to look at and be healed from a plague God sent upon His people  (Numbers 21:4-9). Then this statue becomes an idol that the children of Israel are burning incense to and Hezekiah destroys it (2 Kings 18:4). It is here that it is given a name: Nehushtan. All of this is to say that when we are waiting on anything but God alone, we succumb to the temptation to become distracted by good and holy things: the arc; the temple; church and doctrine; means of grace and divine appointments.

Murray’s remedy: Recognize that we are an immortal spirit destined for the privilege of  eternity and union with God. Religious thoughts and reflections; spiritual disciplines and works of service “very often take the place of waiting on God.” Our two great enemies (not sure why the devil is not included as a third) are the world and self. “Beware lest any earthly satisfaction or enjoyment, however innocent it appears, keep you back from saying, ‘I will go to God, my exceeding joy.’”

Father, I feel this even now. I am not waiting on You only!  Murray wants us to beware of “Pleasing self in little things may be strengthening it to assert itself in greater things.” He calls us back to two foundational truths to keep us on track: “They are: your absolute helplessness; and, the absolute sufficiency of thy God.”

He closes this meditation and this book with the following:

No words can tell, no heart conceive, the riches of the glory of this mystery of the Father and of Christ. Our God, in the infinite tenderness and omnipotence of His love, waits to be our Life and Joy. Oh, my soul! let it be no longer needed that I repeat the words, ‘Wait upon God,’ but let all that is in me rise and sing: ‘Truly my soul waits upon God. On Thee do I wait all the day.’

Father, I long to put this into practice. Work these truths deep in me so that all that is in me will rise and sing: “I wait only on You all day long. ” Amen.

Book Summary: The Cross and the Prodigal by Kenneth Bailey

Rembrandt's Return of the ProdigalThe Cross and the Prodigal:

Luke 15 Through the Eyes of Middle Eastern Peasants by Kenneth Bailey

This is a book summary of The Cross and the Prodigal written by Kenneth Bailey. This is one of most engaging, interesting and inspiring exegesis of Luke 15 that I have ever heard or read. We first heard Kenneth Bailey speak at our church in Florida. At that moment I knew I tapped into a source of understanding the gospels as never before. This summary will be mostly quotes from the book. I don’t have much to add. Get the book – there is a lot more background than there is here.

This little book looks at the three parables in Luke 15. The Parable of the Lost Sheep, the Parable of the Lost Coin and the Parable of the Lost Sons. It spends the most time on the famous prodigal son parable. Kenneth starts us off with the following:

Across the centuries since the rise of Islam, Muslim voices have echoed the cry “Christians have perverted the message of Jesus” and pointed to the famous parable of the prodigal son as evidence.

One of the following arguments is used to support this:

There is no cross and no incarnation, no “son of God” and no “savior,” no “word that becomes flesh” and no “way of salvation,” no death and no resurrection, no mediator and no mediation. The son needs no help to return home. The result is obvious. Jesus is a good Muslim who in this parable affirms Muslim theology.

He then asks the following:

… how is it that both the incarnation (God comes to us in Jesus) and the atonement (the cross is a saving power) appear to be missing?

This Bailey does masterfully. Starting with how we read parables and how we need to listen to them with the ears of 1st century Middle Eastern peasants, he tells us the following about Parables:

What lies between the lines, what is felt and not spoken, is of deepest significance. Indeed, it almost cannot be expressed because it is not consciously apprehended. What “everybody knows” is never explained.
>We start with the complaint of the Pharisees and scribes and Bailey shows how the next three parables all are Jesus’ answer to this complaint:

Luke 15 Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them (ESV).”

Parable of the Lost SheepParable of the Lost Sheep

Then he dives right into the first parable:

3 So he told them this parable: 4 “What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he has lost one of them,

His first observation is:

This verse (Luke 15:4) is a startling response to the complaint of the Pharisees. The Pharisees began as a lay movement, and they were expected to work for a living in some secular profession. One could not accept money for teaching the law. Thus Paul was a tent maker and Jesus a carpenter, and thereby addressing Pharisees as “working men” was not a problem. But shepherds were considered unclean by the rabbis,” who referred to such people as “people of the land and avoided them. Clearly Jesus did not consider shepherding an unclean profession.”

Pharisees no doubt expected Jesus to say something like this: “Which of you, owning a hundred sheep, if you received a report that one was lost, would not send a servant to the shepherd responsible and threaten him with dismissal if he didn’t find the sheep?”

Then also the story Jesus tells is best understood as a reshaping of Psalm 23, with himself at its center. This possibility turns this first parable into an amazing introduction to this trilogy of three stories. Jesus claims to be the divine presence among the people searching for the lost and thus fulfilling the promises of Psalm 23,

Old Testament Parallels to this Parable

He also believes that Jesus is drawing upon Jeremiah 23:1-8 (ESV)

23 “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture!” declares the LORD. 2 Therefore thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, concerning the shepherds who care for my people: “You have scattered my flock and have driven them away, and you have not attended to them. Behold, I will attend to you for your evil deeds, declares the LORD. 3 Then I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all the countries where I have driven them, and I will bring them back to their fold, and they shall be fruitful and multiply. 4 I will set shepherds over them who will care for them, and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall any be missing, declares the LORD.

5 “Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land. 6 In his days Judah will be saved, and Israel will dwell securely. And this is the name by which he will be called: ‘The LORD is our righteousness.’

7 “Therefore, behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when they shall no longer say, ‘As the LORD lives who brought up the people of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’ 8 but ‘As the LORD lives who brought up and led the offspring of the house of Israel out of the north country and out of all the countries where he had driven them.’ Then they shall dwell in their own land.”

and Ezekiel 34:1-31.
>34 The word of the LORD came to me: 2 “Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel; prophesy, and say to them, even to the shepherds, Thus says the Lord GOD: Ah, shepherds of Israel who have been feeding yourselves! Should not shepherds feed the sheep? …

Notice Luke 15:4 “If he has lost one of them.” No self respecting middle easterner would say that. Arabic translations in the past have turned this into a passive to read “If one of them is lost,”… at both ends of the Mediterranean the speaker never blames himself.

Jesus broke the common speech patterns of the day by placing responsibility on the shepherd, saying “If he has lost one of them.” This departure from traditional idiom is important. Jesus is saying to his audience, “You lost your sheep. I went after it and brought it home. Now you have the gall to come to me complaining! Don’t you realize that I am making up for your mistakes?”

Moving on:
(Vs 4) does not leave the ninety-nine in the open country, and go after the one that is lost, until he finds it?

Parable Addresses an Age-Old Problem

Bailey addresses the difficult question: What matters more: Should we put the group at risk to rescue one member of the group?

Christian missionaries have debated this point with communist dialecticians in China. Does the lost individual matter or are “the people” alone important? Indeed, it is the shepherd’s willingness to go after the one that gives the ninety-nine their real security. If the one is sacrificed in the name of the larger good of the group, then each individual in the group is insecure, knowing that he or she too is of little value. If lost, he or she will be left to die. When the shepherd pays a high price to find the one, he thereby offers the profoundest security to the many.

5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing.

Bailey notes that the shepherd had to carry the sheep back over very, very difficult terrain. He also points out that:

When the lost is found, the task of restoration has barely begun. This theme disappears in the second story only to reappear with all of its glorious fullness in the third story. It is a crucial theme within which lies the cross.

In all of these early Eastern artistic presentations of the Good Shepherd, Jesus the Good Shepherdthe price paid is emphasized by the extraordinary size of the sheep. Clearly Christ’s passion is foreshadowed in this text and in these representations of it.

The Pharisees, as religious leaders, were indeed the “shepherds of Israel.” Thus it is easy to see that in this parable Jesus is holding them responsible for any “sheep” (read: person) that is lost from the community. In the parable the shepherd does four things:
• Accepts responsibility for the loss.
• Searches without counting the cost.
• Rejoices in the burden of restoration.
• Rejoices with the community at the success of restoration.
Jesus here sets a high standard for the church in any age.

6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep that was lost.’ 7 Just so, I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.

Jesus’ subtle humor is evident in this verse. The “righteous” who “need no repentance” do not exist. Naturally, heaven’s joy over them will be minimal. As the parable concludes, the ninety-nine sheep are still in the wilderness!

But more important is the fact that the lost sheep is clearly symbolic of a repentant sinner. This comes as a complete surprise. How can this sheep represent “repentance”? Quite simple, Jesus is defining repentance as “acceptance of being found.” The sheep is discovered to be missing. The shepherd pays the price to search for, find and restore the lost sheep.

Parable of the Lost CoinParable of the Lost Coin
8 “Or what woman, having ten silver coins, if she loses one coin, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and seek diligently until she finds it? 9 And when she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin that I had lost.’ 10 Just so, I tell you, there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner who repents.”

If Jesus is the Good Shepherd, then Jesus is also the Good Woman. Clearly this is what he intends his listeners to conclude.

Who was responsible for losing the sheep? … the peasant woman can blame no one but herself. All through her search she mutters repeatedly, How stupid of me! Why didn’t I secure the coin on its chain more firmly? Or as I prefer, Why didn’t I tie my cloth more tightly? Her remorse and desperation stem from this sense of undeniable responsibility, and her joy, like the shepherd’s, cries out to be shared.… the peasant woman can blame no one but herself.

Starting to tie the 3 parables to one pointed message for the Pharisees and scribes, Bailey observes that the shepherd had a party for men while the woman had a party for women.

In the first story the lost is one in a hundred. In the second story it is one in ten, and in the parable of the prodigal son it is one in two.

The second progression is in regard to the availability of the place where the lost article can be found. The lost sheep is in the wide wilderness; the coin is confined to the house. But the sons are lost as they fall out of the circle of a father’s love.

The Three Parables

Bailey provides this helpful summary:

Actors in the Drama The Lost Sheep The Lost Coin The Lost Son
Jesus the shepherd the woman the father
irreligious sinners lost sheep lost coin the prodigal
Pharisees ninety-nine the nine the older son

Parable of the Lost SonsRembrandt's Return of the Prodigal
11 And he said, “There was a man who had two sons. 12 And the younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of property that is coming to me.’

The request itself is a form of mutiny. The prodigal is impatient for his father to die. Theologically, Jesus is affirming that humankind in their rebellion against God really want him dead!

In the villages when I come to this point in a sermon on this text, I always ask, “Who must be the reconciler?” The villagers always answer from their pews, “His brother, of course.” Everybody knows this. Furthermore, he must start immediately. It is up to him to step in at once and try to reconcile his brother to his father.

And he divided his property between them. 13 Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he had and took a journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property in reckless living.

First century Jewish custom dictated that if a Jewish boy lost the family inheritance among the Gentiles and dared to return home, the community would break a large pot in front of him and cry out “so-in-so is cut off from his people.” This ceremony was called the Kezazah (literally “the cutting off”). After it was performed, the community would have nothing to do with the wayward person

14 And when he had spent everything, a severe famine arose in that country, and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him into his fields to feed pigs. 16 And he was longing to be fed with the pods that the pigs ate, and no one gave him anything.

17 “But when he came to himself, he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired servants have more than enough bread, but I perish here with hunger! 18 I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son. Treat me as one of your hired servants.”’

True Repentance or Not?

“Father, I have sinned before heaven and your sight.” Jesus was addressing a scholarly audience. This sentence is a paraphrase from the mouth of Pharaoh when he addressed Moses after the first nine plagues.

The language of the Aramaic version of this text is even closer to Luke 15:18 than the Hebrew [ in the account with Moses]. Everyone knows that Pharaoh was not sincerely repenting.

20 And he arose and came to his father. But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him.

Things didn’t work out the way the son anticipated. What did happen was radically unorthodox from every perspective.

As the prodigal returned to the village he expected his father to remain aloof in the house while he made his way through the village. To say the least, he would be “subdued” in the process by the crowd in the street. As soon as they discovered that the money had been lost among the Gentiles the Kezazah ceremony would be enacted. The son would then be obliged to sit for some time outside the gate of the family home before being allowed to even see his father. Finally he would be summoned. With the boy already rejected by the village, the father would be very angry, and the boy would be obliged to apologize for everything as he pleaded for job training in the next village.

Thanks to Bailey, most of us have heard how radical the father’s response was.

The father, in his house, clearly represents God. The best understanding of the text is to see that when the father leaves the house and takes upon himself a humiliating posture on the road, he becomes a symbol of God incarnate. He does not wait for the prodigal to come to him but rather at great cost goes down and out to find and resurrect the one who is lost and dead. These actions (seen in a Middle Eastern context) clearly affirm one of the deepest levels of the meaning of both the incarnation and the atonement.

Islam claims that in this story the boy is saved without a savior. The prodigal returns. The father forgives him. There is no cross, no suffering and no savior. But not so. The incarnation and the atonement are dramatically present in the story and form its first climax. The suffering of the cross was not primarily the physical torture but rather the agony of rejected love. In this parable the father endures such agony all through the estrangement.

Next, Bailey addresses the question: Did the prodigal repent?

21 And the son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’

Notice that the son doesn’t finish his prepared speech.

Traditional Western interpretation has said that the father interrupted the son and didn’t give him a chance to finish his speech. Rather, faced with this incredible event he is flooded with the awareness that his real sin is not the lost money but rather the wounded heart. The reality and enormity of his sin and the resulting intensity of his father’s suffering overwhelm him. In a flash of awareness, he now knows that there is nothing he can do to make up for what he has done. His proposed offer to work as a servant now seems blasphemous. He is not interrupted. He changes his mind and accepts being found. In this manner he fulfills the definition of repentance that Jesus sets forth in the parable of the lost sheep. Like the lost sheep, the prodigal now accepts to be found.

Restoration of Fellowship

22 But the father said to his servants, ‘Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet. 23 And bring the fattened calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate. 24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.’ And they began to celebrate.

The “best robe” is naturally the father’s finest robe. In the story of Esther, Haman is asked what he thinks the king should do for the man the king wishes to honor. His first suggestion is to have him dressed in royal robes the king has worn (Esther 6:1-9). The prodigal will attend the banquet attired in his father’s most elegant robe. The guests that night will recognize the robe and treat him in a respectful manner because of the clothes he is wearing. They will understand that he has been fully restored to sonship.

The signet ring and the shoes are symbols of sonship according to Bailey. A fully restored son.

The Elder Son
25 “Now his older son was in the field, and as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing.

Bailey notes that a son never works the field but is an overseer. Bailey notes that it would be normal for him to go immediately in – but “he stands aloof.”

26 And he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant.

Bailey says that the proper translation here is not servants but young boys who would not be allowed in the feast but would gather outside. The servants would all be hard at work on the banquet.

27 And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fattened calf, because he has received him back safe and sound.’

Bailey notes with great insight that sitting down to eat with sinners is exactly the complaint of the Pharisees and scribes at the beginning of the chapter. That is what the Father is doing.

The young boy does not say, “Your brother has returned.” “Return” is a big word in the Bible. … Indeed, in Hebrew the word “return” and the word “repent” are the same word (shub). Here in the parable the young boy tells the older son, “Your brother has hēkei.” In Greek hēko can mean “has arrived”; it can also mean “is here.” There is no hint of the prodigal having made a journey of repentance and return. Rather, he has simply appeared and only then did things start to happen.

If the older son had been told “your father has received your brother safe and sound” (as in the RSV and NIV), the older son would have rushed at once into the banquet because such a report would have meant that the father had not yet decided what to do with the prodigal. The older son would naturally want to be present to insist, “Make the irresponsible fool get a job and return the money before you let him in the door!” But if the father has already received the prodigal “with peace” then the two of them are reconciled—and the older son’s point of view has already lost.

28 But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him,

At such a banquet the father sits with the guests. The older son often stands and serves the meal as a “head waiter.” The important difference between him and the other servants is that he joins in conversation with the seated company. By stationing the older son as a kind of hovering head waiter, the family is in effect saying, “You, our guests, are so great that our son is your servant.” But can he bring himself to serve his brother?

He refuses to enter the banquet hall where the guests have already arrived. In any social situation, banquet or no banquet, the male members of the family must come and shake hands with the guests even if they don’t stay and visit. They cannot stay aloof if they are anywhere in the vicinity of the house. Failure to fulfill this courtesy is a personal insult to the guests and to the father, as host. The older son knows this and thereby his action is an intentional public insult to his father.

Because it is in public, this rebellion of the older son is more serious than the earlier rebellion of the prodigal.

For the second time in the same day the father’s response is incredible. Once again he demonstrates a willingness to endure shame and self-emptying love in order to reconcile. The parable briefly and succinctly states, “His father came out and entreated him.” It is almost impossible to convey the shock that must have reverberated through the banquet hall when the father deliberately left his guests, humiliated himself before all, and went out in the courtyard to try to reconcile his older son.
The father’s agony of rejected love is more keenly felt with the older son because of the son’s public insult. Earlier in the day the father paid the price of self- emptying love in order to reconcile the prodigal to himself. Now he must pay the same price to try to win the older son.

29 but he answered his father, ‘Look, these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command, yet you never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends. 30 But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your property with prostitutes, you killed the fattened calf for him!’

The Elder Son’s Sin

The elder son refuses to participate in reconciling his brother to the village because he:
• Rebels against his father. In this speech he insults his father for the second time in one evening by omitting any title. The phrase “O father” is an essential sign of respect.

• Has broken a relationship, not a law.

• Accuses his father of favoritism

• Reads himself out of the family.

• Refuses partnership with his father.

• Despises his brother.

• Catches himself in an unsuspected trap. He says that the younger brother devoured “your living with harlots.” Thereby he refuses to acknowledge that the portion given by the father to the son was really the prodigal’s to do with as he pleased.

• Understands his relationship to his father as that of a servant before his master.

• Needs to be forgiven by his father and his brother.
• Falsifies the meaning of the banquet. The young boy tells him that the banquet is in celebration of the father’s success in creating shalom. The older son cries out, “you killed for him the fatted calf.” The banquet is in honor of the father not the brother. The older son does not allow himself to understand this.
• Is consumed with envy, pride, bitterness, sarcasm, anger, resentment, self-centeredness, hate, stinginess, self-satisfaction and self-deception. Yet he appears to see his actions as a righteous search for honor.

31 And he said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. 32 It was fitting to celebrate and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.’”

If the father is an oriental patriarch, he will cry out, “Enough! Lock him up! I will deal with him later!” By contrast, this father bypasses the omission of a title and overlooks the bitterness, the arrogance, the distortion of fact and the accusation of favoritism. There is no judgment, no criticism and no rejection. He opens his reply with teknon, which is not the ordinary word for “son” (huios). Huios is used for son in verses 11, 13, 19, 21, 24, 25 and 30. The new word (teknon) introduced here is a special word for “son” indicating love and affection.

The parable of the prodigal son is unfinished. Jesus leaves the account in midair. The entire trilogy moves to its poignant climax in the courtyard. Inside the banquet hall tense guests wait to see if the son will give up his rebellion and enter the house in humility. But the ending is missing. Clearly it is omitted on purpose. Jesus’ reason for this omission is obvious in that he is addressing the group of religious sinners who stand in opposition to his message. There is still a chance for them to be reconciled to the Father, present among them in Jesus’ person. In hardness of heart they can also reject his love and increase his suffering.

… Is not the end of the story the cross ⁵? But another option is still open.
Jesus is telling them, “This is my explanation of why I sit and eat with sinners. What now are you going to do with me?” Each reader or listener is pressed to ponder the same question.

The Parable of the Two Lost Sons—the Theological Cluster

Sin. The parable exhibits two types of sin. One is the sin of the law-breaker and the other the sin of the law-keeper.

Freedom. God grants ultimate freedom to humankind, which is the freedom to reject his love.

Repentance. Two types of repentance are dramatically illustrated: (1) earn your acceptance as a servant/craftsman, (2) accept the costly gift of being found as a son/daughter.

Grace. Grace is a freely offered love that seeks and suffers in order to save.

Joy. For the father, joy is in finding. For the son, joy is in being found and re- stored to community.

Fatherhood. The image of God as a compassionate father is here given its finest definition in all of Scripture.

Sonship. Each son returns to the father either defining (the older son) or in- tending to define (the prodigal) his relationship to the father as that of a servant before a master. The father will not accept this definition.

Christology. Twice the father takes upon himself the form of a suffering servant who in each case offers a costly demonstration of unexpected love.

Family/community. The father offers costly love to his sons in order to restore them to fellowship in the context of a family or community. The family is Jesus’ metaphor for the church.

Incarnation and atonement. The father empties himself and goes down and out to meet the sons where they are (incarnation). In the process he demonstrates costly redeeming love (atonement).

Eucharist. As he partakes in the banquet the prodigal is sitting and eating with the father. The father through self-giving love won the prodigal into fellowship with him- self. Thus the heart of the Eucharist is clearly affirmed.

The book concludes with a play that Bailey wrote about this parable.

The Didache – A book summary

The Didache

Didache means teaching which means it is the teachings of Jesus as expounded by the Apostles. In all probability it was penned in the late first century. It most probably was composed by Jewish Christians and is the earliest known catechism

Part I – The Way of Life

Chapter 1 – The First Commandment.

This chapter expands on the first two great commandments: Love God and Love Your Neighbor. It quotes extensively  from the Sermon on the mount as to what it means to love neighbor. It also has the negative golden rule: What you don’t want done to you; don’t do to others

Chapter 2 – Gross Sin forbidden

This chapter goes over the 10 Commandments and expands on them.

It expands on

    • Adultery – to include fornication and pederasty
    • Murder – to include infanticide and abortion.
    • Not bearing false witness to include – “ you shall not speak evil, you shall bear no grudge. You shall not be double-minded nor double-tongued; nor shall your speech be empty.”
    • Not coveting to – “You shall not be covetous, nor rapacious (aggressively greedy or grasping), nor a hypocrite, nor evil disposed, nor haughty. You shall not take evil counsel against your neighbor.”

It concludes this category of sins with: “You shall not hate any man; but some you shall reprove, and concerning some you shall pray, and some you shall love more than your own life.”

Chapter 3 – Other sins

You shall

    • Flee from evil and any pretense of evil
    • Not be prone to anger
    • Not be jealous, nor quarrelsome, nor of hot temper;
    • Not be a lustful one;
    • Not be a filthy talker
    • Not be an observer of omens
    • Not be an enchanter, nor an astrologer, nor a purifier (after the manner of the low-class Orphic practitioners according to Plato’s Republic were those who practiced divination),
    • Not be a liar
    • Not be money-loving, nor vainglorious,
    • Not be a murmurer,
    • Not be self-willed nor evil-minded,
    • Not exalt yourself, Luke 18:14
    • Not give over-confidence to your soul.
    • Not allow your soul to be joined with lofty ones, but with just and lowly ones shall it have its intercourse.

On the positive side:

You shall

    • Be meek
    • Be long-suffering
    • Be have pity and be empathetic
    • Be guileless
    • Be gentle
    • Be good
    • Be always trembling at the words which you have heard – hold what you learn in high regard – honor; write them down.

Chapter 4 – Various Precepts

You shall:

    • Pray for him who speaks to you the word of God, remember him day and night and day; and you shall honor him as the Lord; for in the place whence lordly rule is uttered, there is the Lord
    • Seek fellowship with other followers of the Way in order that you may learn from them
    • Do not long for division but be an agent of reconciliation.
    • Have all of your judgments be fair – not prejudicially judge one over another
    • Be decisive
    • Do not draw things out when you offer your gifts – do it now.
    • Do not murmur when you give
    • Do not turn away him who is in want
    • Share everything you have with your brothers and sisters
    • Do not claim anything as your own
    • Do not withhold discipline from your children, no matter what the age
    • Teach your children the fear of the Lord
    • Do not prescribe an action or attitude to your employees or contractors out of bitterness
    • Be subject to your employer
    • Hate all hypocrisy
    • Hate all that is not pleasing to the Lord
    • Keep all of the commandments of the Lord – neither adding to nor taking away
    • Confess your sins in the presence of other followers of the Way
    • Come to the Lord in prayer with confession

Part II – The way of death

Chapter 5 – The way of death

The way of death is this:

    • Murders
    • Adulteries
    • Lusts
    • Fornications
    • Thefts
    • Idolatries
    • Magic arts
    • Witchcrafts
    • Violent seizing of another’s property
    • False witnessings
    • Hypocrisies
    • Double-heartedness
    • Deceit
    • Haughtiness
    • Depravity
    • Self-will greediness
    • Filthy talking
    • Jealousy
    • Over-confidence
    • Loftiness
    • Boastfulness
    • Persecutors of the good
    • Hating truth
    • Loving a lie
    • Not knowing a reward for righteousness
    • Not cleaving to good nor to righteous judgment
    • Watching not for that which is good but for that which is evil;
    • Where meekness and endurance are far
    • Loving vanities
    • Pursuing requital
    • Not pitying a poor man
    • Not laboring for the afflicted
    • Not knowing Him that made them
    • Murderers of children
    • Destroyers of the handiwork of God
    • Turning away from him that is in want
    • Afflicting him that is distressed
    • Advocates of the rich
    • Lawless judges of the poor
    • Sinning without end

Part III Ecclesiastical Instructions

Chapter 6 – False Teachers and Food offered to Idols

Our life is to

    • Follow in the teachings and admonitions of the Lord
    • Bear the Lord’s light yoke and thereby follow His command to Be perfect
    • Not be afraid if we cannot fully bear the Lord’s light yoke, but to do it as best we can
    • Eat the foods we are able to bear – except for foods sacrificed to idols

Chapter 7 – Baptism

Concerning Baptism:

    • First instruct those who are to be baptized in the Way of Life and the Way of Death
    • Baptize into the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in running water
    • If running water is not available, use cold water from a lake or ocean – and if you cannot use cold water use warm water.
    • If none of those are available, pour water on the head three times into the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit
    • Instruct the baptizer to fast one or two days prior to their baptism

Chapter 8 – Concerning Fasting and Prayer (Lord’s Prayer)

    • Don’t fast when the hypocrites do – on the 2nd and 5th day of the week, but fast on Wednesday and Friday.
    • Don’t pray as the hypocrites do but pray the Lord’s prayer three times a day

Chapter 9 – The Thanksgiving (Eucharist)

Celebrate the Eucharist as follows:

    • First, concerning the cup: We thank you, our Father, for the holy vine of David Your servant, which You made known to us through Jesus Your Servant; to You be the glory for ever.
    • And concerning the broken bread: We thank You, our Father, for the life and knowledge which You made known to us through Jesus Your Servant; to You be the glory for ever. Even as this broken bread was scattered over the hills, and was gathered together and became one, so let Your Church be gathered together from the ends of the earth into Your kingdom; for Yours is the glory and the power through Jesus Christ for ever.
    • Don’t let just anyone celebrate this Thanksgiving with you but only those who are baptized.

Chapter 10 – Prayer after Communion

The following should be prayed after communion:

We thank You, holy Father, for Your holy name which You caused to tabernacle in our hearts, and for the knowledge and faith and immortality, which You made known to us through Jesus Your Servant; to You be the glory for ever. You, Master almighty, created all things for Your name’s sake; You gave food and drink to men for enjoyment, that they might give thanks to You; but to us You freely gave spiritual food and drink and life eternal through Your Servant. Before all things we thank You that You are mighty; to You be the glory for ever. Remember, Lord, Your Church, to deliver it from all evil and to make it perfect in Your love, and gather it from the four winds, sanctified for Your kingdom which You have prepared for it; for Yours is the power and the glory for ever. Let grace come, and let this world pass away. Hosanna to the God (Son) of David! If any one is holy, let him come; if any one is not so, let him repent. Maran atha. Amen.

Chapter 11 – Concerning Teachers, Apostles, and Prophets

    • Receive anyone who teaches according to this teaching of our Lord
    • Do not receive those who teach anything contrary to this teaching
    • Allow an apostle to stay one or at most two days. Throw him out after that.
    • Don’t accept an apostle who asks for money
    • Accept what a prophet says in the Spirit without judgement. They will receive from the Lord if they are in error. Know that everyone who speaks in the Spirit is a prophet. Judge them, not their words, by whether or not their life conforms to this teaching. If they don’t practice what they preach, they are a false prophet.
    • If the prophet asks for money, he is a false prophet

Chapter 12 – Receiving other followers of the Way

    • Receive all who profess at first – but watch carefully his ways. Discern if he is a true follower by the fruit of his life
    • Don’t let him stay more than 2 days as a guest
    • Assist him on his journey as much as you are able
    • After 3 days, if he wants to stay, let him work. If he is not willing to work, kick him out and have nothing to do with him

Chapter 13 – Support of Prophets

    • True prophets and true teachers are worthy of the support of the community
    • Give of the first fruits of your labors to the teachers and prophets in your midst. If you have no prophets or teachers in your midst, give to the poor.

Chapter 14 – Christian Assemble on the Lord’s Day

    • Gather every Lord’s day together with fellow followers of the Way
    • When you gather:
      • Share communion
      • Confess your sins
      • Give thanks
    • Do not allow those who are not reconciled to gather with you. Encourage them to be reconciled.

Chapter 15 – Bishops and Deacons; Christian Reproof

Appoint bishops and deacons from your midst. Here are the qualifications:

    • Meekness
    • Not lovers of money
    • Truthful
    • Proven

Honor them as you honor your teachers and prophets

Follow Matthew 18 in reproving one-another.  Do not reprove in anger but in peace.

Have nothing to do with those who do not repent once confronted per Matthew 18.

Keep the discipline of prayer and the giving of alms ever with you as group of followers of the Way.

Chapter 16 – Watchfulness and the Coming of the Lord

Always be ready and prepared for the Lord’s coming. For you know not the day nor the hour.

Watch out for the wolves that will appear in the last days. Watch for when love turns to hate; when lawlessness increases; when the community of faith betrays one another. Watch for the coming of the Anti-Christ. He shall do signs and wonders and the whole earth will be in awe of him.

Many will fall away – but those who endure will be saved.

Here are the signs of His coming:

First there will be signs in the heavens. Then there will be the sound of the trumpet. Then the resurrection of the dead. Not all, but only His saints. And then shall the Lord appear with all of His saints with Him. And the whole world shall see His coming in the clouds!